Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Web3Privacy

@web3privacyy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

133subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002725702749
TypeChannel
Username@web3privacyy
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/web3privacyy

Growth

1337 Aug 2026, 16:54 — 133 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 00:31 — 133 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:549 Aug 2026, 00:31
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 132–134 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 00:31133no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:54133first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
57.9%
avg views ÷ 133 subscribers
Avg views / post
77.0
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026
Posts held20 (27 May 202623 July 2026)
Views total231
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 00:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
10
Links
51

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥545.5%
🤣327.3%
👏218.2%
19.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 08:27 UTC63 viewsread 9 August 2026

How the U.S. Traced $110M Crypto Money Laundering Cases - link @web3privacyy

20 Jul 2026, 08:04 UTC77 viewsread 9 August 2026

Mixers, Bridges, and Dusting Attacks: An On-Chain Detective on Crypto Criminals’ Key Mistakes and video recording @web3privacyy

14 Jul 2026, 14:52 UTC91 viewsread 9 August 2026

Introducing EthSystems EthSystems builds confidential systems for institutional Ethereum, operating as an independent company focused on privacy, protocol design, and commercial execution https://ethsystems.org/blog/introducing-ethsystems/ @Web3privacyy

8 Jul 2026, 04:08 UTC105 viewsread 9 August 2026

COTI launches private ERC20 standard for encrypted token transfers – Link COTI introduced privacy at the ERC20 protocol level, enabling encrypted balances and transfer amounts while keeping full ERC20 compatibility. Seven tokens are live with privacy features: COTI, wETH, wBTC, USDT, USDC.e, wADA, and gCOTI. @Web3privacyy

6 Jul 2026, 07:15 UTC636 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

New Court Files Reveal How Microsoft Helped the FBI Identify Peter Stokes "Bouquet" (Scattered Spider Member) The court files reveal that Microsoft helped the FBI track Peter Stokes down using GDID — a Global Device Identifier, which is assigned to every Windows installation and cannot be changed unless the OS is wiped. The GDID helped them track: • IP history • Full web activity • Video game activity and games pla

1

30 Jun 2026, 07:53 UTC119 viewsread 9 August 2026

Bybit exploit six months on: Novel laundering tactics, techniques and procedures and the looming threat - link @web3privacyy

26 Jun 2026, 20:31 UTC127 viewsread 9 August 2026

GGDuel Data leak on Solana (@ggduel_media) GGDuel, a competitive betting platform on Solana, has leaked its entire user database !! 905 accounts exposed in plain text, with no encryption or protection whatsoever. - email addresses - usernames - dates of birth - Solana wallets - linked Google and Discord - linked games accounts - legal names - home addresses - phone numbers - IBAN Everything is accessible, everyth

20 Jun 2026, 09:14 UTC127 viewsread 9 August 2026

5 Simple Reasons Why Social Media Bans and Centralized Databases Fail Us https://x.com/saitoofficial/status/2068229397069357283 @Web3privacyy

16 Jun 2026, 08:08 UTC168 viewsread 9 August 2026

- A Practical Guide to Tracing Stolen Funds - link - Evasion Under Blockchain Sanctions. - link @web3privacyy

11 Jun 2026, 10:31 UTC131 viewsread 9 August 2026

Rabby Wallet Faces Privacy Scrutiny Over Pre-Consent Trackers https://x.com/SCBuergel/status/2064621337113465103 @web3privacyy

10 Jun 2026, 06:38 UTC119 viewsread 9 August 2026

Research Notes: ZK on CKB: What I Think Is Possible and Why the Architecture Makes It Tractable - link @web3privacyy

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @web3privacyy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Web3Privacy” (@web3privacyy), 133 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/web3privacyy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.