Channel
@wearedoira
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
184subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002565834611 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wearedoira |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wearedoira |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:14 | 184 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 183 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:22 | 182 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 182 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
125 reactions across 8 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 67 | 53.6% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 11.2% | |
| 🤩 | 12 | 9.60% | |
| 🆒 | 8 | 6.40% | |
| ⚡ | 7 | 5.60% | |
| custom 5451636889717062286 | 6 | 4.80% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 2.40% | |
| 😎 | 3 | 2.40% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.60% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 1.60% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.8% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 24 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Next stop: Bodensee 🌊 Pack your swimsuit, and come spend the day with us at one of Germany’s most beautiful lakes. If you’d like to join, please let us know in the group or DM us (group link is in our bio)
❤11🆒3custom 54516368897170622862
Frankfurt, but with stories you don’t notice when you just pass by 👣✨ See a few moments from our today’s guided tour - more on our IG page (btw check out the collages that came as a result of color hunting today in our stories before they disappear) 🧡
❤11🔥2🤩1🆒1
Munich people, we’re finally doing a little get-together 🍝: dinner, conversation, and a relaxed evening. We’ll be making the restaurant reservation on Wednesday, so drop us a message before then if you're joining ✨
🔥4🤩3❤2😍2🆒2
Flashbacks to our picnic ☀️ Thank you for bringing your energy, food, games & yourselves 🧡 And special thanks to @motadil_craft_modest_fashion (IG) for the lovely tote bags 🫶
❤7🤩7🔥2🆒2😁1
Frankfurt is more than just banks and an airport 🏦✨ Our friend Saidislomkhon is leading a walk through Frankfurt’s history and character — from the Franks and Goethe to the Rothschild family and the city’s rise as Europe’s skyscraper capital. We’ll also talk about the impact of fascism, the post-war rebuild, and how the city became what it is today. Should be interesting both for longtime locals and people new to Fr…
🔥6❤3😎3👍2
POV: You almost stayed home. Most people come to their first Doira event a little nervous. And almost every time, they tell us afterwards: “Why didn’t I join earlier?” Maybe this is your sign to join us next time 🧡
❤13⚡5custom 54516368897170622861
Looks like spontaneous hikes are becoming a Doira tradition 🤩 As long as hiking season lasts, we’ll probably keep disappearing into forests every now and then - so here comes the next one. This Sunday we’re heading to Zwingenberg-Felsberg for a full-day hike through the Bergstraße-Odenwald trails. 📍 Meeting point: Zwingenberg Bahnhof, 10:00 🚆 Or join us earlier in Frankfurt Hbf - there’s a direct RE60 train at 09:3…
❤9custom 54516368897170622863⚡2
This is your sign to say yes to random plans 🤭 Hike in Rüdesheim 🤍 Do you want to hike with us (again)?
❤11❤🔥3🤩1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @wearedoira. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 755,399 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@wearedoira named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Doira” (@wearedoira), 184 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wearedoira.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.