Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
NOVATO
@wealth1040
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
229subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001454763556 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wealth1040 |
| Description | 경제,주식 초보자 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wealth1040 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 229 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:38 | 229 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 45.0%
- avg views ÷ 229 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 103
- 15 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.98%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (28 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,545 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,940
- Videos
- ≈47
- Links
- ≈2,510
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 59s
- Average length
- 59s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5 | 62.5% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 25.0% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://n.news.naver.com/article/023/0003991839 이 분 때문에 시끌벅적한데 예전 기사 찾아보니 역시나....⬇️⬇️⬇️
1년전, 광화문에 수많은 102030을 결집시키게 했던 배인규 대표가 주최한 집회영상 각종 공연을 젊은층과 어르신들 어우러지게 기획하고 우파의 결집을 도운 공은 인정해줘야 한다고 생각합니다
👍4
삼가 고인의 명복을 빕니다 멸공🇰🇷
👍1
찢적찢이라고 위 사진 기사 원문은 노컷뉴스다 너네쪽 언론사 아니니?? 링크 https://naver.me/52aGa020
Photo, posted without a caption
https://naver.me/FhutRNdL 🚨학생 아닌 사람들도 시위하는데 많이 보이던 대진연 이것들 유튜브나 홈피가보면 정으니 찬양에 목숨 걸었음 미공군 박살 내기전에, 너네가 먼저 박살날듯 어휴 ㅃㄱㅇ들
납량특집 : 나는 유령인가? 사라진 투표권은 어디로
https://www.youtube.com/live/6qG4YRvA8SA?si=EAf4XgMULU1zoEQy 체팅창 난리남 공산국가냐?? ㅁㅊ...소급하는 세법이냐 집가진게 죄냐 등등
https://www.youtube.com/live/jscIXcdB2UQ?si=nO3HMQTpRFd9meMO
🚫 전과자 선거출마 금지 🚫 국민 청원입니다 동의부탁드립니다🙇♀️ !! 나라를 대표하고 그지역을 대표하는 의원들은 무엇보다도 청렴하고 결백해야합니다. https://petitions.assembly.go.kr/proceed/onGoingAll/562BB1225B6F1EDDE064ECE7A7064E8B
🚨우리 공무원, 외국인 채용 목적이 중국인? 지금 3권과 언론이 다넘어 갔는데, 공무원까지 넘기면 이나라는 누구 나라인가? ■ 중국인 임용 제도인가? ●●● 9,900명만 동의 해주시면 됩니다🇰🇷 https://petitions.assembly.go.kr/proceed/onGoingAll/549F983BB9652506E064B49691C6967B
🥰2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @wealth1040. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 894,680 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NOVATO” (@wealth1040), 229 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wealth1040.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.