Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Заквашен на книгах

Channel

Заквашен на книгах

@we_and_books

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,341subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001787346769
TypeChannel
Username@we_and_books
Created31 January 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/we_and_books

Growth

1,3401,3411,340.56 August 2026 — 1,341 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,341 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,340 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,341 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,340–1,341 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:061,341+1
10 Aug 2026, 10:431,340-1
6 Aug 2026, 14:011,341no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:521,341first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.1%
avg views ÷ 1,341 subscribers
Avg views / post
202
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held18 (15 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total3,232
Reactions total425
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

493 reactions across 18 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
21243.0%
🔥7314.8%
👍6713.6%
😁367.30%
custom 5372907721114799986214.26%
🥰163.25%
💔142.84%
🕊91.83%
❤‍🔥81.62%
🦄71.42%
👏51.01%
👻51.01%
🤯51.01%
40.811%
🐳40.811%
🤪20.406%
10.203%
🌚10.203%
👾10.203%
💯10.203%
1 further kind10.203%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 493reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 18 we hold a reading for · 83%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @we_and_books. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC112 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Во второй книге «Иерусалима» встретилась такая фраза: послушно ваксил лань-ярд порошком Blanco. Недавно с коллегой обсуждали эти офисные ленты ланьярды, на которых носят бейдж или пропуск, чтобы их не потерять. Как оказалось, этого слова не было ни в моем активном, ни пассивном словаре. Лента и лента. Но как каждый солдат мечтает стать генералом, так и каждая легкомысленная лента мечтает быть серьёзным ланьярдом. Э

12👍21

1 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC146 views23 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Нога человека Писала микрорассказ на какой-то конкурс в прошлом году. Пока сочиняла, дедлайн закончился. Больше ничего не помню) Пусть живет на Автор.Тудей, а то давно там свою страничку не обновляла. «Нога человека» передает пламенный привет Рэю Брэдбери и за сим откланивается, если она вапче может такие телодвижения совершать. Мнется, короче. Переступает с пятки на носок ) — Вы гарантируете, что я вернусь из са

👍106🔥4🌚1👏1👾1

31 Jul 2026, 05:20 UTC179 views34 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Как-то написала рассказ. Он мне долго казался смешным. Даже перечитывала и даже – без отвращения, что само по себе уже моветон, причем двойной. Взрослые люди так не делают. Взрослые люди – как Толстой: рвут на груди рубаху, роняют слезу, испытывают экзенстициальный ужас. При этом, конечно, сами на сермяжном нерве не сыграют ни разу, и лучшее, во что они вообще когда-либо сыграют – это ящик. Поняла, что находилась по

19🔥11❤‍🔥4

31 Jul 2026, 04:53 UTC147 views22 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Вот насочинял человек, а в народе широких сферических масс запомнится разве что двумя строчками из баллады об историческом недосыпе. Как говорится, сами угадайте, какими, не будем показывать пальцем на кому-мешало-что-ребенок-спит и строкой выше. «Памяти Герцена» Наум Коржавин написал как сатирический ответ на одноименное сочинение Ленина. С Ленинским словом по Герцену можно ознакомиться здесь, кстати, это первоисто

👍104🔥4🕊3👏1

30 Jul 2026, 05:02 UTC163 views39 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

📝 Хозяйкам блогерам на заметку: Вспоминаю, как я начинал писать для радио. Рецензировал новые книги. Назойливо демонстрировал свою эрудицию. Я употреблял такие слова, как «философема», «экстраполяция», «релевантный». Наконец редактор вызвал меня и говорит: — Такие передачи и глушить не обязательно. Все равно их понимают только аспиранты МГУ. С. Довлатов «Филиал»

😁2310👍6

28 Jul 2026, 05:05 UTC202 views29 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

17👍5🥰5🔥2

27 Jul 2026, 05:38 UTC192 views32 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Снова потестили учебник по литературе для 6 класса. Я уже однажды нашла там сокращения в эссе Брэдбери о писательстве, которые, на мой взгляд, подвесили четкую и обстоятельную линию аргументации. А ведь подразумевается на примере опуса акулы пера научить начинающего ясности изложения мысли. Я полна скепсиса в отношении учебника. Но! Ловлю себя на мысли, что сужу по одному примеру. Делаю поспешные выводы. Короче, ве

15😁9🤯5🤪2🙉1

25 Jul 2026, 11:38 UTC217 views23 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
File

После того, как я нашла Русалочку в Муровском «Иерусалиме», сказки посыпались на меня, как из рога изобилия. Понятно, что каждый меряет своей меркой, но кто ж нам запретит «искать там, где светло», если вы понимаете, о чем я. Переслушиваю одну из своих любимых песен НАУ с альбома «Титаник» – «Утро Полины» и вдруг вижу, что она про спящую в хрустальном гробу царевну. Сколько лет я представляла себе совершенно другие

12🔥6🐳4🦄1

25 Jul 2026, 06:59 UTC193 views23 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Начало🔼 Одна из самых сильных галлюцинаций, которые я испытала во время чтения «Души», связана с историей Питера Пэна. На такие размышления меня натолкнула и «Мертвецки мертвая банда» ребят, к которой примкнул Майкл, и его полёт с бесом номер N, не больше меньше самим пятым герцогом ада и царем гнева, имя которому Сэм О’Дай. Бес, подхвативший Майкла и организовавший ему полет по всей Душе, не считая подлого уговора

9🔥8💔6

25 Jul 2026, 06:56 UTC187 views18 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Алан Мур, «Иерусалим», книга вторая «Душа» Кирпич «Иерусалима» разделен на три части, которые автором названы книгами. Все они издаются под одной обложкой, отчего сложно сказать, трилогия ли это в истинном понимании, как я оговорилась на эфире. Кирпич-то кирпичом, но дорогу осилит идущий. Или, как говорит сам Мур непосредственно в этой части романа: Пространство и история мира велики, спору нет, но и «Война и мир»

8🔥6👍4

23 Jul 2026, 15:58 UTC196 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Присоединяйтесь к нашему стриму по Иерусалиму Алана Мура https://vk.ru/wall-230503986_141

🔥94👍3🦄1

22 Jul 2026, 15:49 UTC245 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🍄Ну, коли уж пошла грибная тема, то как не вспомнить фантастические грибы Шляпки Пака, за которыми охотятся призраки во второй книге «Иерусалима» Алана Мура, ибо мир, который им всучили, не был миром, который им обещали, которого они ожидали, который они должны были получить по праву. Как найти свой – лучший из миров – спросим у ясеня этих блуждающих душ. ‼️ Завтра вечером 23 июля в 19-00 по Мск/СПб вместе с Ирой Па

custom 53729077211147999869👍643

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @we_and_books. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 39,397 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Заквашен на книгах” (@we_and_books), 1,341 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/we_and_books.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.