Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 娃娃的频道

Channel

娃娃的频道

@wawadepyq

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

40subscribers

+35 since we began measuring on 7 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003879900913
TypeChannel
Username@wawadepyq
Created5 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 September 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/wawadepyq

Growth

54022.57 September 2026 — 5 subscribers10 September 2026 — 22 subscribers13 September 2026 — 22 subscribers18 September 2026 — 40 subscribers7 September 202618 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 12 days, net +35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 19:2040+18
13 Sept 2026, 04:2222no change
10 Sept 2026, 01:1722+17
7 Sept 2026, 07:175first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 5 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
489.0%
avg views ÷ 40 subscribers
Avg views / post
196
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026
Posts held7 (5 September 2026 – 10 September 2026)
Views total978
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Sept 2026, 04:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 5 September 2026 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Sept 2026, 21:58 UTC125 views1 reactionsread 13 September 2026

出击报告 (https://t.me/Hainanbang) 验证留名:*姚姚领先 上课时间:9.10 老师花名:#娃娃 位置坐标:#吉阳区 上课花费:900p 颜值身材:9 服务内容:课表内容 出击体验:今天下午闲来无事,打开了电报,点开公开榜,看到娃娃老师马上问了老师地址约上了,到了约定时间出发了,遥控上楼,进门一看给我整迷糊了老师那🐻是真挺呀,颜值也在线,立刻交了水费,坐下抽了根烟,刚好有个电话进来,于是我一边通电话一边把玩着奶子,结果玩着玩着电话都还没挂被老师一把按在奶子上,气都喘不过来了,这怎么行,我挂掉电话立马抓着亲了下去,老师也很热烈的回应着我,一阵厮杀后,赶紧先去洗澡,洗完上床,柔软的舌头舔过我的咪咪后,就往我下面移去,一口含住我的小弟弟,爽死了,老师口活真好差点给我口出来,接着马上要老师给我戴上了安全帽,先是叫老师女上,我边把玩着老师的🐻,边看着老师那淫荡的表情,受不了了,我接着叫老师躺好,我亲自来操盘,一阵湿…

❤1

10 Sept 2026, 11:55 UTC174 viewsread 13 September 2026
Video

【时间】:2026-09-10 【老师】:娃娃 【留名】:阿锴 【人照】:9.5 【颜值】:9.8 【身材】:9.9 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:9 【综合】:9.7 【过程】:小姐姐自己在小区住,进屋很惊喜,老师完全长在我的 审美点上,身材前凸后翘,很 好看,进房交水费脱衣服就去洗浴,老师很细心帮忙 放温热水,洗完帮忙擦干净,擦干后我躺在床上,老师的身材真的很迷人,软软的,身上没有一点赘肉, bb嫩嫩,大屁股手感超级好,跟老师聊一会后,老 师说先做后背服务,我说不用了不太喜欢别的服务, 直接先69完让老师b骑脸继续舔,舔完后戴t传教士 加后入,老师非常紧似吸似夹,从未有过的感 受,大屁股后入视觉冲击太强了, 啪的声音听着 让人欲罢不能,最近休息不是很好,没顶住老师逼逼会收缩,没坚持多久就交货了,简单冲洗一下,老师没 催又聊了一会,最后帮忙拿鞋穿衣服走人,很好的一 次出击。 📪 Powered by @hainan…

9 Sept 2026, 23:40 UTC190 viewsread 13 September 2026
Photo

【时间】:2026-09-09 【老师】:娃娃 【留名】:厉马 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9.5 【身材】:9.8 【服务】:9.9 【态度】:10 【环境】:9 【综合】:9.53 【过程】:榜单上看到来了位嫩妹新老师,🈷️好cj.停车方便,进门老师妆容挺好,笑起来超甜...女友感十足,感觉是来对了。交了课费,闲聊了会儿,准备鸳鸯浴...课表写的都🈶,波推,臀推,服务周到到位。来到床上,老师很主动配合,直接搂住一顿上下其手,胸前大白兔又挺又糯,屁屁挺翘,爱不释手。接着啃眯眯,俯身开口,有特点👍👍口会摇圈,无齿感,很爽,鸡儿邦硬。口得时间也长,期间69,小穴无异味,有明显反馈。女上起手,有桩基的潜质,墩起来很结实,啪啪啪的水儿立马流淌,再前后摇曳,然后轮到我抱住老师一顿输出,老师在耳边哼哼唧唧,哥哥哥哥,富有魔力。接着V字抽插,同时啃吃大胸,再传教士一顿输出,舒服发射,贤者时间老师会躺你身边,陪你聊各种,休憩过后,接着二发,过程不…

9 Sept 2026, 20:47 UTC150 viewsread 13 September 2026

出击报告 (https://t.me/Hainanbang) 验证留名:小王 上课时间:9月8日 老师花名:#娃娃 位置坐标:吉阳区 上课花费:9p 颜值身材:9.8分 出击过程: 看妹妹的资料就想一亲芳泽,昨晚恰巧妹妹有空就约到了。人照9分,果然青春靓丽,无风尘感,笑盈盈地拉着我的手做在沙发上聊天。非常亲切的女友感!迫不及待的洗漱完毕拉着妹妹上床,妹妹衣衫尽退,真的是又白又嫩,胸型漂亮尺寸刚好。浑身散漫着青春气息,肌肤紧实光滑,让人爱不释手。妹妹温柔的趴在我身上给我口活,口了几下二弟早就饥渴难耐了,直接让妹妹做了上来。妹妹趴在我身上我抓着着妹妹浑圆丰满的臀部用力输出,接着换男后位,妹妹对这个姿势更敏感,我双手扯着妹妹的双手疯狂抽插,妹妹如少女般羞涩微呻,身体却在我每次撞击下颤栗颤抖。又换了个姿势顺利出货了。非常美好的一次体验,还会二刷^_^ 联系方式:@wwsysk89898

6 Sept 2026, 16:22 UTC339 viewsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @hnwdhlgkPhoto

🧚‍♀️ 娃娃 #三亚 #吉阳区 #嫩妹 📊 0条车评,综合评分 好评 0% |人照 |服务 中评 0% |颜值 |态度 差评 0% |身材 |环境 ❣️ 给娃娃写评价 ❣️ 查看老师所有评价 🧚‍♀️ #9p #14pp 预约:@wwsysk89898 双向:@wawaszykklbot

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @wawadepyq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“娃娃的频道” (@wawadepyq), 40 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wawadepyq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.