Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🧡 ≛ w a t t p a d

Channel

🧡 ≛ w a t t p a d

@wattpadMalaysiaStory

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

190subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001342677310
TypeChannel
Username@wattpadMalaysiaStory
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/wattpadMalaysiaStory

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1881901896 August 2026 — 189 subscribers7 August 2026 — 190 subscribers7 August 2026 — 190 subscribers15 August 2026 — 188 subscribers6 September 2026 — 189 subscribers15 September 2026 — 190 subscribers6 August 202615 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 39 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 188–190 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 03:02190+1
6 Sept 2026, 17:42189+1
15 Aug 2026, 13:05188-2
7 Aug 2026, 07:16190no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:24190+1
6 Aug 2026, 21:19189first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍266.7%
❤133.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2022 to 27 December 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Dec 2022, 10:15 UTC≈1,710 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Hola hola, just asking korang nak lagi ke free ebooks link from instagram or nak suggestion cerita kat wattpad or benda lain? Btw hello again!!

  1. Free ebooks on instagram 📚53%
  2. Link cerita wattpad 📖67%
  3. Others ( Contest wattpad ) 🪧25%

The shares total 145%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

25 Jul 2022, 15:16 UTC≈1,770 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @greendboard

Okay dah siap. THANK YOU KEPADA YANG SUDI MENJAWAB 😭🤍🤍🤍 Respon anda amat saya hargai. Maaf menganggu 🤍 Btw this survey is to indentify either you have NPD (Narcisisstic Personality Disorder) or not. So, thank you so much kepada yang sudi menjawab 🤍🤍

25 Jul 2022, 15:15 UTC734 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @greendboardPoll

ও Do you find that you constantly have a willingness to takes advantage of others to achieve your own goals?

  1. 117%
  2. 217%
  3. 358%
  4. 40%
  5. 58%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Jul 2022, 15:15 UTC791 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @greendboardPoll

ও Do you require excessive admiration from others?

  1. 18%
  2. 20%
  3. 317%
  4. 458%
  5. 517%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Jul 2022, 15:15 UTC861 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @greendboardPoll

ও Are you preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love?

  1. 18%
  2. 217%
  3. 325%
  4. 425%
  5. 525%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Jul 2022, 15:15 UTC968 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @greendboardPoll

ও Do you have a sense of entitlement from others that involve unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with their expectations?

  1. 19%
  2. 20%
  3. 364%
  4. 418%
  5. 59%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Jul 2022, 15:15 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @greendboardPoll

ও Do you find you are unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others?

  1. 118%
  2. 218%
  3. 327%
  4. 436%
  5. 50%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Jul 2022, 15:15 UTC≈1,270 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @greendboardPoll

ও Do you find that you are often envious of others and/or believe that others are envious of you?

  1. 19%
  2. 20%
  3. 373%
  4. 418%
  5. 50%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Jul 2022, 15:15 UTC≈1,470 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @greendboardPoll

ও Do others perceive you as arrogant or snobby?

  1. 10%
  2. 250%
  3. 310%
  4. 420%
  5. 520%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Jul 2022, 15:15 UTC682 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @greendboard

Pilih range 1 - 5 1 ( never ) 2 ( rarely ) 3 ( sometimes ) 4 ( often ) 5 ( very often )

25 Jul 2022, 15:14 UTC209 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @greendboardPoll

ও Do you believe you are special and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people or institutions?

  1. 10%
  2. 214%
  3. 336%
  4. 443%
  5. 57%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Jul 2022, 15:05 UTC473 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @greendboardPoll

ও Do you believe you are special and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people or institutions?

  1. 10%
  2. 214%
  3. 336%
  4. 443%
  5. 57%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wattpadMalaysiaStory. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 12 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Dec 2022, 10:15 UTCAnonymous Poll75 voters

Hola hola, just asking korang nak lagi ke free ebooks link from instagram or nak suggestion cerita kat wattpad or benda lain? Btw hello again!!

  1. Free ebooks on instagram 📚53%
  2. Link cerita wattpad 📖67%
  3. Others ( Contest wattpad ) 🪧25%

The shares total 145%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

25 Jul 2022, 15:15 UTCFinal Results12 voters

ও Are you preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love?

  1. 18%
  2. 217%
  3. 325%
  4. 425%
  5. 525%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Jul 2022, 15:15 UTCFinal Results11 voters

ও Do you have a sense of entitlement from others that involve unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with their expectations?

  1. 19%
  2. 20%
  3. 364%
  4. 418%
  5. 59%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Jul 2022, 15:15 UTCFinal Results11 voters

ও Do you find you are unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others?

  1. 118%
  2. 218%
  3. 327%
  4. 436%
  5. 50%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Jul 2022, 15:15 UTCFinal Results11 voters

ও Do you find that you are often envious of others and/or believe that others are envious of you?

  1. 19%
  2. 20%
  3. 373%
  4. 418%
  5. 50%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Jul 2022, 15:15 UTCFinal Results10 voters

ও Do others perceive you as arrogant or snobby?

  1. 10%
  2. 250%
  3. 310%
  4. 420%
  5. 520%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2022 to 27 December 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🧡 ≛ w a t t p a d” (@wattpadMalaysiaStory), 190 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wattpadMalaysiaStory.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.