Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🌅ᴡᴀʀᴅ - ᴇɴᴅʟᴇꜱꜱ ᴡᴀꜱᴛᴇʟᴀɴᴅ🌌

Channel

🌅ᴡᴀʀᴅ - ᴇɴᴅʟᴇꜱꜱ ᴡᴀꜱᴛᴇʟᴀɴᴅ🌌

@wardfeed

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

51subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002306058161
TypeChannel
Username@wardfeed
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/wardfeed

Growth

515251.58 August 2026 — 52 subscribers10 August 2026 — 52 subscribers15 September 2026 — 51 subscribers8 August 202615 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 38 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 51–52 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 16:4151-1
10 Aug 2026, 10:3152no change
8 Aug 2026, 11:4552first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

42 reactions across 6 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5406822569590422218921.4%
🍓921.4%
🐳819.0%
custom 6007839020019617367511.9%
custom 540235086009520682349.52%
custom 521545009687483177224.76%
custom 544071646721554065024.76%
custom 521550528720458288912.38%
custom 535059632378979297312.38%
custom 544035136063564215912.38%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 20:26 UTC26 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤩 🤩🤩Рисую в ивенте от шопа, связанного с покеасками. Типо локального артфайта.🤩🤩 Первые две атаки🤤 (помогите, фурри повсюду) 🌟 #гифт #арт

🍓6custom 52154500968748317722custom 52155052872045828891

6 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC38 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @h1toworksVideo

Пожалуйста я буду рада комментаррям от каждого как вам Вот бы репосты ещё эхх.. #художества

🐳3🍓2custom 54407164672155406502

3 Aug 2026, 19:34 UTC49 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Накидайте пепсов поняшек для реквестов, как-то захотелось поняшность почирикать😫 #щп

custom 54068225695904222185

2 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC65 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @asksouthparkOCPhoto

❤️😊😍😊😊😊😊 1. Честер "Мунлайт" Нотт 2. 17 лет 3. Говорят, что последние выпуски школьной прессы стали куда живее - заголовки находят место сплетням и интригам, а снимки становятся всё пикантнее и провокационнее. Виной тому - Мунлайт. Парень с детства увлекался съемкой, но переехав в Южный парк из Денвера, наконец смог заняться любимым делом публично - он находит интересные кадры и истории в каждой, казалось бы, пусто…

🐳2custom 53505963237897929731custom 54068225695904222181custom 60078390200196173671

2 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC52 viewsread 10 August 2026

Буду рад вопросам, если приглянется

1 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC40 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @AskPokemonPhoto

«ПОКЕКАФЕ» "╭───────────────.🌟..─╮ Нас встречает Амур с милыми угощениями. Ах, какая леди! ╰─..🌟.───────────────╯" 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 #Ивент@AskPokemon #Амур@AskPokemon

1 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC63 viewsread 10 August 2026

‼️🥲😀🤪☺️😗😀‼️ Сюда в коммы буду закидывать в течении дня атаки уже на меня😳 Возможно и в следующем году сюда же буду пополнять #артфайт #итоги

1 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC62 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ И так, артфайт для меня подошёл к концу! Я доволен своей продуктивностью в этом году и планирую совершенствоваться к следующему. Сейчас я буду параллельно заканчивать реванш своей любимой Женушке, и наконец отдыхать😋 Благодарю всех за участие! Lets go comedy team --- Оставил тут парочку своих работ с этого аф, в целом я сделал что хотел - потренировался на разных персах, попробовал пощупать…

custom 54023508600952068234custom 60078390200196173673custom 54068225695904222182custom 54403513606356421591

31 Jul 2026, 05:43 UTC41 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @h1toworksPhoto

Атака на красотак WardFeed и Shenai_san очень рада что успела нарисоват для них #художества

🐳3🍓1custom 54068225695904222181custom 60078390200196173671

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @wardfeed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🌅ᴡᴀʀᴅ - ᴇɴᴅʟᴇꜱꜱ ᴡᴀꜱᴛᴇʟᴀɴᴅ🌌” (@wardfeed), 51 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wardfeed.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.