Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Военный архив

@wararxiv

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

171subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001816380116
TypeChannel
Username@wararxiv
Created24 July 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/wararxiv

Growth

1717 Aug 2026, 10:12 — 171 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 14:46 — 171 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 10:128 Aug 2026, 14:46
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 170–172 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 14:46171no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:12171first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
68
Videos
909
Links
17

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
27m 49s
Average length
1m 28s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

50 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3672.0%
👍714.0%
🙏48.00%
💯24.00%
🍾12.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 January 2025 to 23 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Mar 2025, 16:46 UTC510 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Суджа. Анатомия разгрома. Часть 3. Пролет оптоволоконного дрона "КВН" от Заолешенки в направлении госграницы в окрестностях г. Суджи, Курской области. "Дорога в ад" для десятков единиц техники оккупантов ВСУ, организованная операторами FPV-дронов "ИЦПБТ Рубикон" ВС РФ. 00:00 - Bushmaster PMV 00:13 - БМП-1 00:21 - M1A1 "Abrams" 00:30 - БМП-1 00:40 - БМП-1 01:15 - HMMWV 01:36 - International MaxxPro 02:16 - VAB 02:2

🔥2

23 Mar 2025, 16:45 UTC422 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Суджа. Анатомия разгрома. Часть 2 На видео пролет оптоволоконного FPV-дрона "КВН" из Суджи через н.п. Рубанщина в направлении АПП "Суджа" с обзором небольшого участка трассы "Суджа-Юнаковка" с фиксацией тяжелых потерь ВСУ в технике. Особо стоит отметить значительное количество потерь противника в инженерной бронетехнике (2 мостоукладчика M60 AVLB, ИМР-2, БТС-4). За предоставленное видео благодарим авторов ТГ-канала

🔥1

23 Mar 2025, 16:42 UTC353 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Суджа. Анатомия разгрома. На видео разбитая колонна бронетехники ВСУ на трассе «Суджа-Гуево-Горналь» - одной из важнейших артерий снабжения группировки ВСУ в Курской области. Результативная работа операторов FPV-дронов ИЦПБТ «Рубикон» по коммуникациям ВСУ обеспечила кризис и крах плацдарма противника. За предоставленное видео благодарим авторов ТГ-канала «СвиноREZ» - действующих пилотов оптоволоконных FPV-дронов «

🔥1

6 Mar 2025, 10:31 UTC≈3,000 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

Как вы там, гниды, рассказываете: неспровоцированное нападение России?

17 Feb 2025, 13:50 UTC≈2,390 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Курское направление «Иксоводы» ВДВ нашли и сожгли два Норвежских ЗРК «NASAMS». Против «Ланцета» не вывезли они.

🔥2

17 Feb 2025, 13:49 UTC≈2,360 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

Четыре боевика ВСУ на остановке в Курской области дождались. Но не автобуса.

16 Feb 2025, 19:19 UTC≈3,010 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Скрытно подлетели и уничтожили Расчёты БпЛА 11 одшбр из Бурятии при помощи FPV-дронов с управлением по оптоволоконным проводам сожгли два мостоукладчика «Biber» на базе немецкого танка «Леопард-1».

🔥3

13 Feb 2025, 08:38 UTC392 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Дроны на "оптике", как средство контрбатарейной борьбы и борьбы с системами ПВО в тылу... Сегодня, по данным уже открытых источников, наши дроны на оптике летают на расстояния более 30 км. При этом их возможности буквально находить дыру в противодроновом обвесе вражеских САУ, просто поражает. А отсюда и ... проблемы противника.

🍾1🔥1

6 Feb 2025, 10:34 UTC≈2,390 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Кадры объективного контроля уничтожения нескольких боевых бронированных машин ВСУ расчетами FPV-дронов на оптоволокне группировки войск «Север» в зоне проведения СВО в Сумской области

🔥3👍1

5 Feb 2025, 15:21 UTC≈2,520 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

Так теперь выглядят многие прифронтовые дороги, находящиеся под постоянными ударами вражеских FPV-дронов.

5 Feb 2025, 15:07 UTC293 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Расчетом ОТРК «Искандер-М» нанесен ракетный удар по месту скопления живой силы и ВВСТ бригады территориальной обороны ВСУ в н.п. Стецковка Сумской области. В результате удара уничтожены склад боеприпасов, а также свыше 50 единиц бронированной и автомобильной техники повышенной проходимости.

🔥2

1 Feb 2025, 11:17 UTC≈2,800 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Бандеровцам просто нужно позволить говорить и писать то, что они думают.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wararxiv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Военный архив” (@wararxiv), 171 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wararxiv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.