Channel
@wanqiulianjie
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
12subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002106988710 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wanqiulianjie |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 7 March 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wanqiulianjie |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 12 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 12 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2024 to 1 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://t.me/sz366 https://t.me/szxiuche007 https://t.me/aakk66788 https://t.me/yinshinannv66 https://t.me/yaoyao798 1 https://t.me/zzaa9455 https://t.me/xiaohaibao446 https://t.me/shenzhenshasha https://t.me/szww568 https://t.me/gaoduanwaiweihuiz 2 https://t.me/shenzhenqun2022 https://t.me/szqmjiaoliu https://t.me/Nanshanali666 https://t.me/chuhai7683 https://t.me/SZLY8888 3 https://t.me/fruits1699 https://t.me/szqm…
👏1
https://t.me/shenzhen157
https://t.me/Ashenzhen
https://t.me/waiweiziy
1 https://t.me/szchihewanle https://t.me/aaaszcha https://t.me/yhy52188888888 https://t.me/qgky8888 https://t.me/SZLHMYY614614 2 https://t.me/szgz12345 https://t.me/LFsiyue https://t.me/gaoduanwaiweihuiz https://t.me/xunhuanchuji https://t.me/cctvgf1 3 https://t.me/ssddss8988 https://t.me/sz366 https://t.me/loufengziyuan https://t.me/xiaosaoB888666 https://t.me/sxy68899 4 https://t.me/Nanshanali666 https://t.me/sansh…
👍1
https://t.me/nanjinghongjiu
罗湖🌸新人个体开课💗 乖巧体贴 三点粉嫩 听话配合 天然大🐻 敏感体质💧热情主动 高档公寓🏠 人照合一🌸
https://t.me/qzfx1
https://t.me/sz366 https://t.me/szxiuche007 https://t.me/aakk66788 https://t.me/yinshinannv66 https://t.me/yaoyao798 1 https://t.me/zzaa9455 https://t.me/xiaohaibao446 https://t.me/shenzhenshasha https://t.me/szww568 https://t.me/gaoduanwaiweihuiz 2 https://t.me/shenzhenqun2022 https://t.me/szqmjiaoliu https://t.me/Nanshanali666 https://t.me/chuhai7683 https://t.me/SZLY8888 3 https://t.me/fruits1699 https://t.me/szqm…
https://t.me/MutualPeople
https://t.me/sz4689
https://t.me/Owow0444
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wanqiulianjie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@wanqiulianjie named 16 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“群链接” (@wanqiulianjie), 12 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wanqiulianjie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.