Channel
@wannabeeeetch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
132subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002659549585 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wannabeeeetch |
| Created | 31 May 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wannabeeeetch |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 132 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 131 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 31 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (31 May 2025 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 421 |
| Reactions total | 125 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
531 reactions across 10 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5280777674728444084 | 120 | 22.6% | |
| custom 5472196949702643588 | 98 | 18.5% | |
| custom 5208965018380437317 | 77 | 14.5% | |
| custom 5190832950651947281 | 74 | 13.9% | |
| ❤ | 49 | 9.23% | |
| custom 5208541281201980179 | 30 | 5.65% | |
| custom 5447212154279186655 | 18 | 3.39% | |
| custom 5190621638260983040 | 17 | 3.20% | |
| custom 5321071305552834131 | 13 | 2.45% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 2.26% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 1.13% | |
| custom 5321326684308254211 | 4 | 0.753% | |
| custom 5404373897065817559 | 3 | 0.565% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 0.565% | |
| 😘 | 2 | 0.377% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.377% | |
| custom 5371089322155996669 | 1 | 0.188% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.188% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.188% |
Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 531reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wannabeeeetch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 May 2025 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
мне не понравилась новая карточка энни в бо, заскетчила другую #annie щитпост | твиттер | тт
custom 519083295065194728123custom 520896501838043731714custom 528077767472844408413custom 51906216382609830401custom 52085412812019801791custom 54721969497026435881
живи смейся люби флоани #floani щитпост | твиттер | тт
custom 547219694970264358827custom 520896501838043731719custom 519083295065194728117custom 52085412812019801796custom 52807776747284440842custom 51906216382609830401
ставь лайк или женись на ней #annie щитпост | твиттер | тт
custom 520896501838043731733custom 519083295065194728117custom 547219694970264358814custom 52807776747284440844custom 52085412812019801792custom 54472121542791866552
измену легче объяснить #selfship #eren щитпост | твиттер | тт
custom 528077767472844408429custom 519062163826098304013custom 547219694970264358811custom 51908329506519472812
в честь данного события можете позадавать вопросики под этим постом или написать что-то доброе если хочите 🤩
custom 528077767472844408411custom 54721969497026435888custom 52089650183804373173
сегодня моему каналу исполняется год несмотря на то, что я пару раз сносила все посты до основания, он самый живучий из всех моих предыдущих тгк я рада, что кому-то оказалось не все равно на мое творчество и на мои рандомные пейринги и рада, что за год познакомилась с огромным количеством людей из фандома в общиммм, спасибо, что подписываетесь, лайкаете, любите, это все взаимно 🤩 #floani щитпост | твиттер | тт
custom 547219694970264358823custom 528077767472844408414custom 520854128120198017912custom 51908329506519472812custom 52089650183804373171custom 54472121542791866551
ради этого я захожу в тт #щп
custom 528077767472844408424custom 544721215427918665513custom 547219694970264358813custom 51908329506519472814custom 52089650183804373172
последний пост перед сессией 🤩 #annie щитпост | твиттер | тт
custom 528077767472844408423custom 51908329506519472819custom 52085412812019801799custom 52089650183804373174custom 51906216382609830402custom 54472121542791866552custom 54721969497026435881
ванабич pinned a photo
ребят, всем привяо, хочу взять несколько реквестиков на неопределенный срок ❤️ вам нужно скинуть в комментарии фотографию персонажа, которого вы хотите, чтобы я нарисовала и я возьму первые 4 реквеста но если вы не успели написать первыми, все равно кидайте свои запросы и я выберу дополнительный 5 реквест на свой вкус рисую онли людей! 4/4
❤12🤯4⚡1custom 52089650183804373171
хочется удалить все репосты, кроме этого #floani щитпост | твиттер | тт
❤37custom 532107130555283413113🔥12custom 53213266843082542114🕊3custom 54043738970658175593🤯2😘2
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @wannabeeeetch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 451,210 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ванабич” (@wannabeeeetch), 132 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wannabeeeetch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.