Channel
@wanjiajimi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
28subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002030530342 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wanjiajimi |
| Description | 广告洽谈: @TGMAX123 增粉引流: https://t.me/FS123_YINLIU 苹果ID|协议号: https://t.me/XPanelShop 增粉平台客服： @FS123Panel 👉投放广告: https://tgads.org/m/lizhidaososo |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wanjiajimi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 28 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 28 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (26 March 2025 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢肉便器精选 📢皇冠招商 皇冠娱乐 PA... 📢综艺Show✨ 📢欧博官网🅰️亚星官网�... 📢抖音风 裸舞 📢jk 丝袜 制服 📢皇冠\亚星|欧博|尊龙|... 📢欧博官网|欧博代理|欧博... 📢港澳通 📢皇冠代理 皇冠体育 皇冠... 📢中国功夫|武术|拆解|动... 📢圖奇福利大揭密性感美女视... 📢皇冠娱乐 皇冠足球 皇冠... 📢AV 岛国女优精选 📢寸止-媚黑 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢球速体育相信品牌的力量、老品牌值得信赖、不限ip、免实名。 📢 Ton 中文索引 📢💎 【8.cc】U投领导者 千万域名 百亿大盘 充值笔笔加赠3% 📢✅金边娱乐城✅全网上押800万u盘总聚集地 🥇西湖娱乐城✅老品牌包出款✅出款超10亿U 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonGroupHelpBot 设置为频道管理员，即可在2000+频道进行互推曝光，实现订阅
知名VTuber被新人撞臉引發熱議？露西亞轉生咪醬卻被冒牌貨開臭38歲老阿姨？被稱為特級咒物的Vtuber【みけねこ 三毛貓】的爭議事件
離開Ubisoft卻成功打臉了半個遊戲產業？編劇竟然是Reddit找來的用戶？歷史上玩家最喜歡的遊戲【Expedition 33 光與影：33號遠征隊】背後的故事
靠大歐派成為億萬富翁的那個男人！他的作品竟因為角色太性感被IGN批評？成為韓國五十大富豪的劍星製作人【金亨泰 Kim Hyung tae】的傳奇故事
🎉 X-Panel | 海外社交媒体账号出售 💋 购买账号➡️上粉包装➡️推广引流 一战搞定 ❤️🔥 Telegram协议号全网最全，纯一手号，质量硬，带量来谈！！ 👉Twitter、Facebook、Ins、苹果id、海外邮箱....... 欢迎带量咨询~ 🌐官方网站 🔰账号交易 👩🏻💻联系客服
德國骨科天花板神作！妹妹竟然還懷上了哥的孩子？遊戲界最具爭議的【The Coffin of Andy and Leyley 安迪和莉莉的棺材】的故事
曾被稱為低劣版魂類的遊戲如何逆襲口碑？工作室不迎合DEI贏得玩家尊重！2023年“失敗”的魂類遊戲【墮落之主 Lord Of The Fallen】的故事
10款Steam 平台最昂貴的遊戲！一款遊戲居然要價將近一百萬美金？【VR長征，Megajump，Spooky Men等】
最受玩家社群愛戴的好萊塢明星！為了還原遊戲原著不惜跟劇組鬧翻？居然為了打遊戲而差點錯過超人的角色？【Henry Cavill 亨利·卡維爾】的故事
最醜女主蘿雯顏值逆襲！官方整活最致命！知名喪屍跑酷遊戲【Dying Light 垂死之光】換臉事件
原神因誘導未成年氪金而被罰款！為何米哈遊被美國盯上EA卻沒事？抽卡遊戲存在著什麼問題？
遊戲界最醜男主逆天改命！遊戲玩法讓玩家氣得負評爭議？台灣獨立武俠佳作【活俠傳 Legend of Mortal】的深入解析
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wanjiajimi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 638,550 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 34 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@wanjiajimi named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GamerSecret 玩家機密游戏分享” (@wanjiajimi), 28 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wanjiajimi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.