Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Waniester

Channel

Waniester

@waniester

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

913subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001756041751
TypeChannel
Username@waniester
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded29 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/waniester

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

913930921.529 August 2026 — 930 subscribers30 August 2026 — 930 subscribers9 September 2026 — 922 subscribers18 September 2026 — 913 subscribers29 August 202618 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 20 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 910–933 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 02:17913-9
9 Sept 2026, 00:36922-8
30 Aug 2026, 01:14930no change
29 Aug 2026, 02:45930first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 15 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

83 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 98.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8298.8%
🤣11.20%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2026 to 5 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 May 2026, 18:45 UTC421 views13 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Настал ли тот миг, когда бытие встречается более в одиночестве, чем среди людей?

13

29 Apr 2026, 18:02 UTC534 views10 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Ходит, значится, и доминирует всем своим павлиньим видом 🦚

10

28 Apr 2026, 10:40 UTC467 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Государство есть друг и враг жизни 😀 Государство крадет у нас нашу жизнь, преобразовывая из экзистирующего Дазайн в ресурс под названием избиратель или неизбиратель. Без государства страну захватили расприи и войны. Еще большие чем с государством. Но государство, это «техно-бюро зверь», который превратит все в безжизненный ресус для себя, если ему позволить

3

26 Apr 2026, 18:02 UTC377 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

6

24 Apr 2026, 18:01 UTC437 views12 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Фейковый беларусский хайп 🇧🇾🪞🇷🇺 Сейчас в интернете, в связи с блокировками РКН россиян, появляются различные пасты и видео о том, каким же уголком спасения и спокойной жизни является Беларусь. И как там работает интернет, и жизнь работает. Так вот, все это миф и чушь, говорю как беларус. Беларусь в 2026 году, это кривое зеркало России, которое еще не до конца запотело от своей собственной тоталитарности. Мало того

12

22 Apr 2026, 18:35 UTC341 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

И каждый раз глядя на архитектуру 19 века, осознаю, что прогресс, это не про технологии и электронику, прогресс это про ширину мысли и воли

8

21 Apr 2026, 18:03 UTC358 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Быть, чтобы быть 👤 Всю жизнь нас мучает мысль «Зачем мы живем?». Мы пытаемся придумать жизни смысл и соответствовать ему, но этот смысл — лишь наше воображение. Когда вы держите в руке камень, может ли этот камень нести в себе больший смысл, чем просто смысл собственной «каменности»? Наша жизнь не может иметь иного смысла, кроме как быть собою. Поэтому я бы отпустил все эти смыслы: жизнь дана не для того, чтобы бы

8

19 Apr 2026, 18:00 UTC326 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

6

17 Apr 2026, 18:02 UTC400 views11 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Человеческая доброта🧑 Лесть и доброта, это враг человека. Как только мы начинаем быть доброжелательным, альтруистичным и добрым к другим. То для других людей мы умираем теряя всякую ценность. Становимся доступными, а значит превзойденными. Случайные другие люди не ценят нас за то, какие мы есть, как мы добры и открыты, нет. Нас ценят за то, насколько сложно нас получить и насколько мы величественне, чем те, кто пыта

10🤣1

15 Apr 2026, 13:45 UTC379 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Просто немного моей варшавской жизни

6

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @waniester. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Авторский Взгляд
@vzglyadavtora · 42,253
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Waniester” (@waniester), 913 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/waniester.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.