Channel
@wangzhuzi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
688subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002045751691 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wangzhuzi |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wangzhuzi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:44 | 688 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 688 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (11 July 2024 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 12 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
6 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 83.3% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2024 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢🔞亚洲外流群🔞 📢利博私网🅰️万利私网�... 📢macca的日常生活 📢亚星包杀 欧博包杀 亚星... 📢国漫社|混子哥|动画 📢港股票方|港股接盘|港股... 📢全球短信API 📢高分综艺|经典名场面 📢AI短剧成人/黄果短剧/... 📢sex照片欣赏|高清裸照 📢皇冠代理皇冠体育 皇冠官... 📢电报账号购买 📢亚星代理 欧博代理 亚星... 📢欧博私网 欧博代理 亚星... 📢欧博包杀 欧博私网 亚星... 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢🔰开元官方🔥代理70%|电子棋牌|AG百家乐 📢🔥最强平台强势来袭，掀起智能合约新风暴！ 🔥 ✅东南亚大事件✅柬埔寨大事件✅东南亚新闻 🚀蓝图数据🚀SDK+DPI｜106通道技术分析全行业💰技术实力诚邀合作🔥 📢XX789🔞成人资源一站式导航 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonGroupHelpBot 设置为频道管理员，
来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢欧博代理 欧博正网 欧博... 📢欧博私网 亚星私网 欧博... 📢清纯少女 |肤白貌美|人... 📢苏荷 菲律宾 马卡提 趴... 📢诱惑性感喷泉乔老师 📢TikTok日本女优频道 📢利博代理 利博官网 利博... 📢皇冠足球 皇冠体育 欧博... 📢(郑州)高端外围精选 📢色情游戏及成人游戏网站 📢精品课程|办公应用|付费... 📢欧博代理 欧博正网 欧博... 📢Ohentai 📢美女|泳装|热舞 📢江门中山95-98 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢💎 【8.cc】U投领导者 千万域名 百亿大盘 充值笔笔加赠3% 📢东南亚今日头条|新闻|爆料|悬赏|通缉|吃瓜缅甸妙瓦底大揭 📢✅【辉煌娱乐城93.CC】柬埔寨某盘总3天在辉煌豪赢150万U秒出款 📢💎85.CC电子百家乐0审核包出款支持汇旺提U 📢联盟数据Data 全行业数据，sdk dpi源头直出欢迎合作 🇨🇳 简体中文包 …
❤1
王竹子的sm教学频道|小众猎奇|两性文化|虐恋 pinned a photo
🎉 X-Panel | 海外社交媒体账号出售 💋 购买账号➡️上粉包装➡️推广引流 一战搞定 ❤️🔥 Telegram协议号全网最全，纯一手号，质量硬，带量来谈！！ 👉Twitter、Facebook、Ins、苹果id、海外邮箱....... 欢迎带量咨询~ 🌐官方网站 🔰账号交易 👩🏻💻联系客服
❤1
王竹子的sm教学频道|小众猎奇|两性文化|虐恋 pinned a photo
💥Apple ID、Twitter、Ins协议、海外各大邮箱 ,价格最低，质量最稳！！！ 💥 Telegram协议号全网最全，纯一手号，质量硬，带量来谈！！ 💥 买账号➡️ 项目包装 ➡️推广引流 一站搞定！ 👉 更多精彩服务等您解锁.... 📢官方网站 🛍账号交易 📖教程目录 👩🏻💻联系客服
👍1
📌华语最佳社交媒体增长平台 — xpanel.plus 🎈打造全网最全面、最便宜的自助引流服务！ 🎈海外媒体（telegram、ins、twitter、youtube、faceboo、tiktokk等） 🎈提供点赞、关注者、观看次数、评论、分享...... 🎈推荐：群组强拉、会员开通、媒体账号等服务，价格低廉
王竹子的sm教学频道|小众猎奇|两性文化|虐恋 pinned Deleted message
王竹子的sm教学频道|小众猎奇|两性文化|虐恋 pinned a photo
TG Ads平台 − 在Telegram优质频道里投放广告🪧 本平台的运营理念是：用频道助力品牌曝光，强化品牌形象。广告可选按点击或按天投放，让品牌曝光更加高效。 欢迎各位广告商和频道主加盟！一起携手开启，全新模式的投放渠道，实现双赢！ TG Ads网址 : https://tgads.org
❤1
王竹子的sm教学频道|小众猎奇|两性文化|虐恋 pinned Deleted message
王竹子的sm教学频道|小众猎奇|两性文化|虐恋 pinned Deleted message
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wangzhuzi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 302,459 of 1,084,084entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@wangzhuzi named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“王竹子的sm教学频道|小众猎奇|两性文化|虐恋” (@wangzhuzi), 688 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wangzhuzi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.