能查到的信息会不会有点太多了💦
👍7❤5😍3

Channel
@wangwangsgk
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
7,491subscribers
-1,330 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002059820082 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wangwangsgk |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 23 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 21 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wangwangsgk |
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
@wangwangsgk was previously reachable at these 2 handles, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:59 | 7,491 | -206 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 19:20 | 7,697 | -51 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:44 | 7,748 | -83 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 10:36 | 7,831 | -75 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:15 | 7,906 | -42 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 18:56 | 7,948 | -56 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 12:10 | 8,004 | -80 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 06:49 | 8,084 | -114 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 23:16 | 8,198 | -124 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 8,322 | -242 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 8,564 | -46 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 8,610 | +19 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:22 | 8,591 | -212 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:58 | 8,803 | -160 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 8,963 | -41 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 9,004 | +323 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 8,681 | -55 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 8,736 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 8,740 | -19 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 8,759 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 23 August 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 15 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
126 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 83 | 65.9% | |
| ❤ | 24 | 19.0% | |
| 😍 | 10 | 7.94% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 3.97% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.59% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 1.59% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
能查到的信息会不会有点太多了💦
👍7❤5😍3
全网Top1 社工库!注册送现金💰 旺旺社工库承诺:所有数据都为真实收录,非虚假数据,查不到就是查不到,查到百分百真实! 功能介绍: 各种查询类 输入任意信息即可查到 qq号 微信号 身份证号 姓名 车牌 工作单位等等信息 内部爆破医保系统 目前支持中原地区一人查询全家! 短信轰炸!! 限时9月12日到9月30日期间 注册+邀请1位新用户 即可获得 10元现金!!! 连续签到7天+每日邀请2位新用户 即可获得68元现金!! 直接提现到微信支付宝🔰🔰 查看软件使用教程 以及 无障碍权限锁机谣言!不存在锁机,无障碍权限是因为要保证一个手机对应一个用户! 本应用永久免费使用!无需任何付费并且以后也绝不会收费 务必关注频道以获取最新更新: https://t.me/wangwangsgk
👍5❤3
Video, posted without a caption
❤3👍3
短信轰炸最新效果❤️
👍4😍1
近期支付宝泄漏了8亿条数据👌 已经更新进去了😁😁
👍11❤2😍2🥰1
我相信有人会一直支持免费的社工库的✌️ 本人只为了流量,不为别的,后续社工库app预计会加入一些广告🫡
👍23❤5
短信轰炸一分钟效果
👍3
新版本即将更新功能! 1、qq号/微信号查手机号 2、手机号查身份证号+姓名 3、身份证号查姓名、查家庭地址 4、手机号查外卖地址! 5、支持身份证号模糊查询,全国猎魔 以上属于综合查询目录 另外 全网最牛逼短信轰炸!一秒20条! 吊打收费项目!
👍3
明天修复原来版本部分手机无法使用的问题
👍3
向北免费户籍助手 功能包含: 1.免费查询信身份证信息 2.短信轰炸 3.每日签到领积分 7.qq查手机号 https://t.me/xiangbeikh https://t.me/xiangbeikh https://t.me/xiangbeikh
👍6❤3
功能包含: 1.免费查询信身份证信息 2.短信轰炸 3.每日签到领积分 7.qq查手机号
👍5👌2😍2🥰1
安装包
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @wangwangsgk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@wangwangsgk edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“旺旺户籍助手【签到送钱💰】” (@wangwangsgk), 7,491 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wangwangsgk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.