Channel
@wanghui002
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
847subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002954768184 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wanghui002 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wanghui002 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:28 | 847 | +4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 843 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (1 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,973 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🥐艺名: 王慧 🤗年龄: 23身高 : 170体重 :48 熊:D 📍位置: 闵行 💸价格: 1000p/50min 1500pp/90min 👩🎓标签：无套口#水中箫#漫游#胸推#过水吸皮#69#吸蛋蛋 🥂联系老师: @wanghui02 💓老师频道: https://t.me/wanghui002 韩信上海备用榜：https://t.me/shhxyxb 韩信上海优选榜：@hxshyx 韩信上海精选榜：@hxshjxb 上海外围大⭕️：@ccxkshww
12.00开
上线
台风把你吹走了么？不出现
1点
【时间】：2026-08-07 【老师】：王慧 【留名】：匿名 【人照】：9 【颜值】：9 【身材】：9 【服务】：9 【态度】：9 【环境】：9 【综合】：9 【过程】：联系好老师，按时赴约，老师迎上来亲切问候，老师颜值十分精致耐看，付完水费陪洗，老师脱衣帮洗，技巧熟练，前后都洗很仔细，随后帮我擦干转战床上，老师一来就十分的诱人，先是坐你腿上慢慢摩擦，🐔🐔直接梆硬特别表扬下老师的舌头，很灵活，口的时候毫无齿感，舔得我十分的舒服，两个凶器，柔软好吃，揉起来很舒服，老师直接主动大坐，边叫边动，女上永动机，特别说一下，逼逼滚烫忍不住想射，有种欲罢不能的感觉，换了很多种姿势都十分配合，甚至在镜子前面还叫着我看镜子，一个字爽，爽完清洗一番，和她交谈十分的舒服，会耐心倾听，跟她交谈有一种恋爱的感觉，床上非常有日感，叫的特别浪，推荐冲。
白
😁1
🈳
https://t.me/moduguangmingding2/24251?single
等你来🈷️
12.30
【时间】：2026-08-01 【老师】：王慧 【留名】：匿名 【人照】：9 【颜值】：9 【身材】：9 【服务】：9 【态度】：9 【环境】：9 【综合】：9 【过程】：由于不经常出击有点小紧张，老师很耐心做了心理疏导，我很快就进入了状态，终于能体验一下什么是大屁股大奶子了！😍老师不错不错，下次再来必反老师 【狼友大队】：点击入群
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @wanghui002. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 812,581 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“王慧 个人资料” (@wanghui002), 847 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wanghui002.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.