Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

MDMIOS签名apk免杀TF签名AWS不死签

@wangcaimdm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002162364299
TypeChannel
Username@wangcaimdm
Descriptiontf签名认证服务- testflight签名平台上传支持ipa^
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/wangcaimdm

Growth

810 August 2026 — 8 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8 subscribers10 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7–9 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:028no change
10 Aug 2026, 05:318first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 8 subscribers
Avg views / post
1.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (19 January 20265 August 2026)
Views total2
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTCviews —

MDMIOS签名apk免杀TF签名AWS不死签 pinned «💥专业APK报毒处理,免杀,防毒,加固,修复,【免费测包】独家技术处理。稳定可靠,诚信服务 🔝全天为您服务: @cs365bot @shiguang27022»

5 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC1 viewsread 12 August 2026

💥专业APK报毒处理,免杀,防毒,加固,修复,【免费测包】独家技术处理。稳定可靠,诚信服务 🔝全天为您服务: @cs365bot @shiguang27022

31 Jul 2026, 11:17 UTCviews —

MDMIOS签名apk免杀TF签名AWS不死签 pinned «我们的iOS安卓统一分发链接,实现自动跳转,防红防封,国内国外无屏蔽,国内地区采用国内机房,全球CDN加速,高速安装,推广顺畅、省时省心,让老板您无后顾之忧。 🆎双向联系: @Kf364bot @S6signi»

31 Jul 2026, 11:17 UTC1 viewsread 12 August 2026

我们的iOS安卓统一分发链接,实现自动跳转,防红防封,国内国外无屏蔽,国内地区采用国内机房,全球CDN加速,高速安装,推广顺畅、省时省心,让老板您无后顾之忧。 🆎双向联系: @Kf364bot @S6signi

1 Jul 2026, 17:21 UTC4 viewsread 12 August 2026

TestFlight)简称TF签名 自有开发者服务平台,可免费提供内测 TF签名归属苹果商店企业内测模式。 🍎 无视任何app类型可接,需要客户提供原包过系统机审。 🍎 过机审后,只要用户安装到桌面即可稳定使用三个月不掉签!!!! ❤️24小时热线: @Kf363bot @cqsignalann

28 Jun 2026, 07:37 UTC4 viewsread 12 August 2026

🤝王总充值🤝 老板第一次和我们合作,不到两个月已经完全信任我们了,所有包加新包都转移到了我们这儿,感谢老板的支持,承蒙关照,我们保证不会辜负每一个老板的期待,还在纠结的老板也不用着急,凡事讲究一个缘分,咱们能合作上就有那个缘,没有合作也没关系,也祝福你以后越来越好发大财🎉🎉🎉 ⏬️双向联系: @cs364bot @qiankuntechw

9 May 2026, 06:45 UTC11 viewsread 12 August 2026

专业接综合棋牌,社交,直播,圈外,圈内,应有尽有。mdm,v3,超级签,独家书,24小时在线,为你APP保驾护 👈全天为您服务: @cs365bot @guluios

21 Mar 2026, 11:18 UTC16 viewsread 12 August 2026

全网最稳定超级签mdm企业签V3 🍎单次充值300台每台人民币2元, 🍎单次充值1000台每台1.7元,单次3000台以上1.6元,普通应用需每天低消10台, 🍎量大价更低,防闪退 不高版本 苹果签名 超级签名 🎵24小时在线: @cs364bot @tftaomamao

20 Mar 2026, 14:44 UTC14 viewsread 12 August 2026

各位老板好,公司承接企业签名,超级签名,还有TF签名,稳定不掉签,便宜好用,可接各种类型,不清楚细节的老板可以详细咨询我,满足任何稳定性任何需求的应用,手上多本证书,只要你愿意,你签10本咱们都能提供 ⏮️免费测试: @Kf364bot @yixiugeios

18 Mar 2026, 09:24 UTC14 viewsread 12 August 2026

iOS企业签|长期稳定|全球秒下|24小时在线 要稳定? 真独立证书,掉签秒切! 要速度? 全球CDN加速,下载快如闪电! 要安全? 海外域名,防屏蔽,防风控! 要数据? 管理后台,设备/活跃数据一目了然! 要服务? 技术团队24小时在线,随叫随到! 专治:棋牌、菠菜、直播、社交等应用分发各种不服! ✈️需求联系: @cs365bot @hhfdscbe

17 Mar 2026, 19:54 UTC11 viewsread 12 August 2026

公司所有的苹果企业签名所用账号都是真金白银购买的,并非市场上的共享证书,所以一定能保证客户ios签名的稳定性,体验我们的证书,不为掉签而发愁 由于苹果企业签名的账号数量有限,并且严格控制每个账号签包的数量,所以尊享版ios签名我们签包的个数是有限的,立刻联系客服咨询是否可签。 随时解决您提出的任何问题,告别着急更新而找不到人的烦恼,你的满意,是我们不懈的追求。 🔵加入合作: @Kf365bot @addBBf

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wangcaimdm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 180,198 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MDMIOS签名apk免杀TF签名AWS不死签” (@wangcaimdm), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wangcaimdm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.