Channel
@wanderingbutterfly
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
131subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001193053118 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wanderingbutterfly |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wanderingbutterfly |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 131 | -2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 01:37 | 133 | +3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 130 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 129 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 127 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:21 | 127 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 126 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
117 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 104 | 88.9% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 4.27% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.71% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 1.71% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.855% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.855% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.855% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.855% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2025 to 24 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
it was my 25th (ooof) birthday recently. i turned 25. all i could think of was achievements. i did not travel to top of the mountain. i did not win a medal for running in race. i did not earn a lot of money. i did not make my parents proud. i did not see stars twinkle. i did not maintain friendships. i did not learn piano. i did not produce music. i did not sketch. i did not love myself. i did not complete games. i…
❤15
zara kabhi meri nazar se khud ko dekh bhi
happy pride 💖
❤11
i wanna be so high in love, so mad in love. do little idiotic things for you in love. crave your touch in love. curl my toes and giggle in love. I WANNA BE SO HIGH IN LOVE. i wanna be so high in love. so high in love so in love in love
❤13
i have been trying to get out of the societal shell of WHAT IS APPROPRIATE DOING WHAT SUITS YOU STAYING IN THE LINE and a small step was cutting my hair short. maa said it won't look good, you are fat and it just won't suit you. these boundaries are icky, i don't like them. why? i don't care if it suits me or not, i just want to try it out. i don't care. i have one life and i want to live it fully without any re…
❤9
so i been trying to read substack, and here is my excerpt from the first article i read. Carl Jung Psychology Until you make the unconscious conscious, it will direct your life and you will call it fate. Persona What you put on is a social face to navigate the world. It is required, as you can't show all of yourself to everyone all the time. The problem lies when people forget that there is a person beneath the…
❤2
i made an origami dragon took me 1 hour it isn't the best one but i feel satisfied for completing it and i guess that's worth it.
what i send to everyone after i meet them.
❤5🤣1
my plushies
❤2😁1
someone shared this to me this morning. i felt emotions that i probably never felt before, cause i never been appreciated this way for my art. it felt warm. it felt as if "avantika, you need to make more art, look, you are loved for it" now now, i know you don't make art for others but it doesn't hurt to be appreciated once a while. so thank you to the person who sent that message and thank you to whoever likes my …
❤7👍1
this is a checkpoint, how have you been?
🥰4❤1
yes i would like help but would i tell it? i guess no. how can i? how can i ever begin to express the mess i am the mess i created, the mess i will create just pure nuisance. but gosh, oh i want someone to come, hold me by their hands, as i well up, as i cry, as my body trembles. but it's okay, i don't even know what's real anymore or what's happening anymore everything is blurred i don't remember things i don't re…
❤3😢2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wanderingbutterfly. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wandering Butterfly” (@wanderingbutterfly), 131 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wanderingbutterfly.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.