A quick update: You can now withdraw grams and jettons with zero fees

Channel
Duck Wallet
@wallet_duck
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
175subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002520759718 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wallet_duck |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 10 June 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wallet_duck |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 175 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 174 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:21 | 174 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 28s
- Average length
- 28s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
199 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5415594207068822547 | 40 | 20.1% | |
| 🔥 | 39 | 19.6% | |
| 👍 | 37 | 18.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 26 | 13.1% | |
| 🤯 | 24 | 12.1% | |
| 🦄 | 17 | 8.54% | |
| 😢 | 13 | 6.53% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.01% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 0.503% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 199reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2025 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 20
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 10
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 50%
- Most on one post
- 11
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wallet_duck. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 June 2025 to 30 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Dear friends! We have made the decision to close the current project. Our team is completely shifting gears and pivoting to the development of new digital products. All your funds are completely safe. We are opening a 30-day window during which you can safely and without any rush withdraw your tokens. What you need to do: 1. Open the app. 2. Go to the withdrawal section and transfer your available tokens to your per…
😢9👍2🦄1
RACC x Duck Wallet 🚀 Duck family is growing! $RACC has been officially listed in Duck Wallet. Grab your bags and manage your $RACC with ease. 😘 + 🦡 = To the moon! Duck Wallet: @wallet_duck_bot
❤🔥10🔥7👍6
Sticker, posted without a caption
👍5🔥4❤🔥2custom 54155942070688225472
🎤 New Partner: Duck Save Duck Wallet is now integrated with another useful Telegram bot! 📥 Duck Save Bot lets you download videos or music from YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok. No ads. Free to use. Just send a link — get the video. 👉 Try it now: @ducksave_bot 😉 Duck Wallet — your gateway to the duckverse.
🔥9❤🔥5🦄4
Multicheque for 10K DUCK (1.88$) Cheques: 100/100 activations 100 DUCK (0.018834$) each
Multicheque for 30 USDT (30.00$) Cheques: 150/150 activations 0.2 USDT (0.200026$) each
Multicheque for 16.5 TON (27.02$) Cheques: 150/150 activations 0.11 TON (0.180116168$) each
Multicheque for 75K DUCK (21.08$) Cheques: 150/150 activations 500 DUCK (0.140535$) each
Multi-Cheques have landed in Duck Wallet 🎉 One message. One multi-cheque. Maximum simplicity. You can now create a single multi-cheque that contains multiple independent rewards — perfect for giveaways, community drops, or quick team rewards. 🚽 To create a multi-cheque, just type: @wallet_duck_bot {sum} DUCK {count} in any chat, group, or channel — and one multi-cheque will appear right there in the conversation. …
🔥6🦄3👍2
Ducks! 👋 Brief downtime is required for scheduled technical maintenance. Tomorrow, November 26th, at 10:00 PM (22:00) CET, access to the Flappy Duck game and Duck Wallet will be temporarily limited. Maintenance will take no more than two hours. Thank you for being with us! 🦆
👍4❤🔥2🦄1
Sticker, posted without a caption
👍6custom 54155942070688225474
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wallet_duck. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 188,391 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Duck Wallet” (@wallet_duck), 175 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wallet_duck.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.