active
🔥11

Channel
@waggleinsights
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
929subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001657630245 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @waggleinsights |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 28 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/waggleinsights |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 929 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 930 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 930 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 September 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
24 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 11 | 45.8% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 12.5% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 12.5% | |
| 🤮 | 3 | 12.5% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 8.33% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2023 to 7 September 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
active
🔥11
💎 Zora: Mint NFT Optimism Zorb 👀 You'll be surprised by what you can get just by simply minting an NFT 👣 Easy steps: → Link: zora.co/collect/oeth:0x544c2bd4a3ce5015036eb95ce3ba9626d25ad8c8/1 → Connect Wallet (Optimism Chain) → Click "Mint" (Fee: $1.5) → Done 🔔 Ending: Jun 30 More
🤮3👍1
Top CEXs by Netflow in the last 7 days 🌊 SEC crackdown hits hard on: → Binance netflow drops by $2.38 billion → BinanceUS netflow down by $999 million → Coinbase netflow decreases by $114 million Still, most exchanges continue operation as usual. More
Happy Weekend 🤗
She looks so happy 🤭
Top chains ranked by % Address Retention in the last 3 months 💬 Address retention indicates % of addresses from the previous timeframe that also executed a transaction in the selected timeframe. Higher = better. Top 3✅ 🥇 #Arbitrum = #Fantom 58% 🥉 #Optimism 46% More
Sui only has 1k daily active addresses, which is 15x lower than Aptos and 275x lower than Solana.⚪️ Meanwhile, Sui has $9.4 billion in FDV, almost equivalent to Solana and Aptos. is Sui a dead chain already? 🤔 More
💯3
Top chains ranked by Daily Active Addresses 💬 Counting the number of unique wallet addresses sending an on-chain tx in a rolling 24h period. 🗣 Highlights: → TRON holds #1 → Bitcoin makes it to Top 3 → zkSync Era & Starknet join Top 10 More
Top Chains ranked by NFT Sales Volume in the last 7 days 🖼️ Top 5 Chains / #1 Collection: 🥇 Ethereum / BAYC 🥈 Bitcoin / OXBT 🥉 Solana / Mad Lads 4️⃣ Mythos / DMarket 5️⃣ BNB Chain / Lucky Bird More
📣 Today #CryptoNews 📥 @binance is set to reenters Japan market after 5 years. 📥 Arbitrum-based @jimbosprotocol got hacked, losing $7.5M. 📥 "Everyone should be prepared for rates going higher from here," says Jamie Dimon - CEO JP Morgan. 📥 Dormant $15 million wallet from Ethereum ICO wakes up after eight years. 📥 USA: Biden & McCarthy reach debt-ceiling deal.
📣 Today #CryptoNews: 📥 Binance gains first Southeast Asian license from Thailand 📥 ETH balance on exchanges nears ATL: Glassnode 📥 JPMorgan: Gold prices signal Bitcoin should be at $45,000 📥 Blend, NFT Lending by Blur, seizes 82% of NFT lending market share: DappRadar 📥 Dogecoin surpasses Ethereum and Bitcoin in daily transaction 📥 Ethereum L2s soar to ATH in monthly mainnet data publishing fees, crossing $16 m
👍2
Waggle #CryptoNews: 📥 Binance enters NFT Lending market 📥 Circle launches euro-backed stablecoin on @avax 📥 DCG sunsets trading unit TradeBlock 📥 Binance halts deposit Multichain-bridge tokens 📥 Tether CTO says US default unlikely because it would be 'catastrophic'
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @waggleinsights. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@waggleinsights named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Waggle Insights” (@waggleinsights), 929 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/waggleinsights.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.