Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Пельмень|ωαƒα.com🥟

Channel

Пельмень|ωαƒα.com🥟

@wafo4ka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

82subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002392380283
TypeChannel
Username@wafo4ka
DescriptionПРИВЕЕЕТ!! ооооочень рада тебя тут видеть! ИНФО - https://t.me/wafo4ka/243 Участник сквада: @DarkLight_squad
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/wafo4ka

Growth

827 August 2026 — 82 subscribers9 August 2026 — 82 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 81–83 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 18:0282no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:0182first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.9%
avg views ÷ 82 subscribers
Avg views / post
40.1
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
22.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held17 (29 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total601
Reactions total132
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
132
Videos
3
Links
11

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

132 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53864301335885013253526.5%
custom 53800154023634334193123.5%
custom 53820576764925469742518.9%
custom 53796165459305228722015.2%
custom 537970934728888719286.06%
custom 537967027167642570053.79%
custom 537980402125299356643.03%
custom 537999107996363439443.03%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 22:06 UTC17 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Вы бы знали сколько азиатских треков и опенингов я послушала пока рисовала...такой вайб... А ещё сегодня мама в магазине общалась со старой знакомой и несколько раз упоминала что её дочке скоро 20...нет...какие 20 куда..неееетт.......😓 🤩При рисовании постарадали 20 китайских мальчиков!🤩 #четывысрала

custom 53796165459305228722custom 53798040212529935662custom 53864301335885013252

Signed Пельмень Говяжий

8 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC17 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌠Это чо, контент? Рисунок? Ахпхпх, короче да, сделала обои нам с моим бедолагой, вроде хайпова, не совсем мой вайб, но моему дед инсайдику подходит 🌟 ❗️Подпишис!!!❗️ #арт #скетч #четывысрала

custom 53796165459305228724custom 53797093472888871923custom 53800154023634334192custom 53864301335885013252custom 53799910799636343941

Signed Пельмень Говяжий

4 Aug 2026, 23:21 UTC41 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

У вас около 10-11 дней!!!

custom 53864301335885013254custom 53799910799636343942custom 53820576764925469742

Signed Пельмень Говяжий

4 Aug 2026, 23:20 UTC39 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ну хоть какой-то контент...

custom 53800154023634334194

Signed Пельмень Говяжий

4 Aug 2026, 23:20 UTC40 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ready🌠 #Вафля #Лир

custom 53820576764925469745custom 53800154023634334192custom 53864301335885013251

Signed Пельмень Говяжий

4 Aug 2026, 23:20 UTC41 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

Я меняла там букву, пришлось всё заново кидать...

custom 53820576764925469744custom 53800154023634334192custom 53864301335885013251

Signed Пельмень Говяжий

3 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC37 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Где арты? А хуй знает, я в каком-то тильте, постараюсь рисовать...

custom 53864301335885013256custom 53800154023634334193custom 53796165459305228721

Signed Пельмень Говяжий

2 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC42 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Имбоооо ето яяяя #четывысрала #щп

custom 53820576764925469745custom 53797093472888871923custom 53800154023634334192custom 53796165459305228721custom 53799910799636343941custom 53864301335885013251

Signed Пельмень Говяжий

1 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC45 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Как у вас дела?

custom 53796165459305228723custom 53800154023634334193custom 53864301335885013251

Signed Пельмень Говяжий

30 Jul 2026, 22:20 UTC48 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌻💖💕💕💕💕💖 🤎Продолжаю рисовать нас с my boyfriend до его стрижки 4 числа...это будет судный день для меня...поддержите меня за..пэнис.. #арт #четывысрала

custom 53800154023634334193custom 53864301335885013253custom 53796165459305228721custom 53797093472888871921custom 53820576764925469741

Signed Пельмень Говяжий

29 Jul 2026, 23:44 UTC59 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 53864301335885013253

Signed Пельмень Говяжий

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @wafo4ka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 744,975 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пельмень|ωαƒα.com🥟” (@wafo4ka), 82 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wafo4ka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.