Channel
@w_fa_i
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,076subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002021873717 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @w_fa_i |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/w_fa_i |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 1,076 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 1,081 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 1,082 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (29 January 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 623 |
| Reactions total | 15 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
105 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 61 | 58.1% | |
| 🥰 | 21 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 15.2% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 2.86% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.952% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.952% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.952% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.952% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
♡ من سنن يوم الجمعة ♡  • الاغتسال  • التطيب ولبس أحسن الثياب  • السواك  • التبكير إلى صلاة الجمعة  • قراءة سورة الكهف  • الإكثار من الصلاة على النبي ﷺ • الذهاب ماشياً إن أمكن  • الإنصات للخطبة  • صلاة السنة بعد الجمعة  • تحري ساعة الإجابة 
❤1👏1🥰1
Signed 𝒘𝒂𝒇𝒂𝒂"🍒
لا ينساك الله .. ولو ظننت أنك بالكاد تتحمَّل الحياة، يأتيك باليُسْر والفرج في ذلك الوقت الذي تشعر فيه أنك على شفا حفرة من السقوط.. فالله إذا أراد بك خيرًا تعجَّبتَ من طريقته، يأتيك الخير من بين ألف طريقٍ ضيَّق، حتى أنك لا تعلم متى وكيف حدث ذلك .. فاطمئن.♡
❤3🥰2🌚1🍓1👍1
Signed 𝒘𝒂𝒇𝒂𝒂"🍒
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3👎1
Signed ωαfαα 🎀
"معلومه صغيرة " مفيش حاجة اسمها صحاب * مفيش حاجة اسمها مستحيل* مفيش حاجة اسمها بعدين * مفيش حاجة اسمها لو كان* مفيش حاجة اسمها تأجيل * مفيش حاجة اسمها احسن منى*
👍5❤2
Signed ωαfαα 🎀
ستتعلم أغلى الدروس، من أرخص الناس ."❤️🩹
❤3👍3🥰2
Signed وفاء⇣
الهروب من مشاكل الحياة ، سباق لن تفوز به أبداً ."
👍5🥰2
Signed وفاء🦋
الحمد لله على نعمة اليقين بالله، والحمد لله الذي وهبنا قناعة الرضا بقضاءه والإيمان بأنَّ كلّ مُرٍّ سيمرّ، ولا شيء دائم في هذا العالم! الحمد لله الذي أهدانا الصبر على البلاء، والحمد لله أننا مؤمنون بفرجه، وأنه سيجازينا خير على كلّ ألم، وسيبدل خوفنا آمنًا وألمنا راحةً. الحمد لله أنه الله، والحمد لله على كلّ نعمةٍ وعلى كلّ محنةٍ وعلى كلّ بلاءٍ، والحمد لله دائمًا وأبدًا.
❤9🥰1
Signed وفاء🦋
سيموت نصف إبداعك إن فكرت في رأي الآخرين ، تذكر أن لك زاوية لا ينظر للأشياء منها سواك
👍2❤1🥰1
Signed وفاء🦋
هو موقف واحد يحصل وهيخليك مش بتهتم بأي حاجة زي زمان .
❤5🥰1
Signed وفاء🦋
وأجعل لي من بعد موتي أهلاً وأصحاباً وأحبة لا يهجرون وصلي بـ الدُعاء يا الله❤️🕊
🥰5❤2
Signed وفاء⇣
"لا تخدعكَ مَباهجُ الحياة، فصفوُها مَشوبٌ بالكدر، وراحتُها متبوعةٌ بالتعب. خُلقت هذه الدارُ لتكونَ مَحطةَ اختبار، لذّتُها قليلةٌ مقارنةً بعنائها، وساعاتُها تسرقُ العمرَ في غفلةٍ منا. ما نحنُ فيها إلا عابرو سبيل، نحملُ حقائبَ أعمالنا ونمضي نحو ميعادٍ لا ريبَ فيه، فاجعل لقلبكَ مستقراً وراء حدودِ الفناء."
❤4🥰2
Signed وفاء⇣
*التعلق دا اكتر حاجه بتدمر اي بني ادم انك تتعودي علي شخص ويكون ليه جزء كبير من يومك ويكون كل حاجه ليكي وفجاه يبعد ويسيبك ل افكارك ودماغك .*
💔3🥰1
Signed وفاء⇣
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @w_fa_i. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 613,661 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بوستات دينيه” (@w_fa_i), 1,076 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/w_fa_i.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.