Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

wWay79

@wWay79

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

574subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002568982518
TypeChannel
Username@wWay79
DescriptionИногда выпускаю ролики
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/wWay79

Growth

5747 Aug 2026, 10:31 — 574 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 10:48 — 574 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 10:317 Aug 2026, 10:48
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 573–575 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 10:48574no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:31574first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
108.7%
avg views ÷ 574 subscribers
Avg views / post
624
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (21 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total12,480
Reactions total141
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
105
Videos
20
Links
13

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

141 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5337.6%
😁3726.2%
👍1812.8%
🔥1510.6%
🥰117.80%
👎74.96%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 141reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC125 viewsread 7 August 2026

ахахахаха. бля ну это же несусветный урод

7 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC123 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dyy0u

Posted without readable text

😁6

7 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTC165 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вообще, хочу поделиться одной мудростью для тех, кто делает ставки. Всегда ставьте против китайцев/азиатов — на дистанции это явно будет плюс. Потому что всегда есть два варианта: 1.Азиат просто бездарь. 2.Он номинально сильнее, но «китайская финансовая грамотность» еще сильнее. Работает это в любом виде спорта. будь то киберспорт или большой теннис. просто запомните дети мои

10

7 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC225 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Боюсь представить что в этом сезоне даст... Габен хуесос. за то что просто не играешь в фейсыт. тебе слизывает миллиард эло

6 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC348 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

И еще. в этом месяце я сделаю 4 видоса на ютубе Теперь вот и думайте. какой из 2 постов пиздеж

😁10

6 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC363 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Если честно, я давно не видел, чтобы персонаж в российском кино настолько воровал каждую сцену. Колобок в новом «Последнем богатыре» — это вообще отдельный уровень. Ради него одного уже стоит сходить в кино. Редкий случай, когда семейный фильм одинаково хорошо работает и для детей, и для взрослых. Если давно думали выбраться в кинотеатр — это как раз тот самый повод. Короче, рекомендую. Берите близких и идите смотр

😁182

3 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC531 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Лучше поговорим об успешных людях До сих пор злоба берет. то что он додумался. а мы НЕТТТ Саня Вудуш. абсолютно нехаризматичный. без какой либо уникальной внешности, со средним реальным онлайном 100 человек. путем накрутки и абуза рекламодателей заработал миллионы рублей

🥰1😁1

3 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC498 viewsread 7 August 2026

Честно. я бы много что мог про него написать. кто он такой и так далее. ноо во 1-ых у меня щас в тг 600 сабов. это более чем бессмысленно. темболее кому нахуй интересен титькастый чел. да никому лол во 2-ых время покажет. надо быть более мудрым. по крайне мере сейчас. пока я нишевый блогер надо эго свое при себе сдержать.

2 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC774 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Лучшая антиреклама видоса Я бы трижды задумался, прежде чем кликать на гайдера «2500 эло» Мне даже самому интересно, откуда такое эго у этих паразитов, которые думают то что эти цифры реально показатель, даже 3500-4000 не всегда что-то говорят. Да даже среди тир2-тир3 игроков много нубасов, а тут бля титулованный 2500 эло. ну ахуеть

15🥰10

30 Jul 2026, 13:01 UTC972 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⭐ ДОЖИЛИ. ⭐ Ну я не знаю. ну почему челы сверху так смешно выглядят. ну я бля

🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wWay79. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 299,283 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“wWay79” (@wWay79), 574 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wWay79.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.