Channel
@vyneling00
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
57subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002413405890 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vyneling00 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vyneling00 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 57 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 57 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (8 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,285 |
| Reactions total | 238 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
318 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤩 | 72 | 22.6% | |
| custom 5424997483912635082 | 64 | 20.1% | |
| 🆒 | 53 | 16.7% | |
| 🍌 | 44 | 13.8% | |
| custom 5377809442735677305 | 43 | 13.5% | |
| 🐳 | 29 | 9.12% | |
| custom 5465307542986976101 | 5 | 1.57% | |
| custom 5474273776843642925 | 4 | 1.26% | |
| custom 5397962275397079345 | 3 | 0.943% | |
| custom 5269544999514566088 | 1 | 0.314% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 318reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vyneling00. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
крч мне впадлу ему фон рисовать, поэтому сегодня без него зайки😔 а еще я наконец дотянулся ручками до комикса и собрался с мыслями но мне еще надо с брелками закончить, артами в тт…
custom 537780944273567730510🆒6custom 54249974839126350825🍌2🤩1
7:09 эти люди на заднем фоне очень выбесили меня, пришлось использовать пинтерест ради этих кучек а, ну и еще двери в виде глазиков почему у него вайб сергея зверева???
🆒9🤩7custom 53778094427356773055custom 54249974839126350822🍌1🐳1
побольше бы красивых и проработанных гача моделек! в последнее время обожаю рисовать на лесные и готические темы, это оч вайбово🤍🤍
🤩9🐳6🍌5🆒2custom 53778094427356773052custom 54249974839126350822
10:17 отныне это моя самая любимая работа, потому что я чокнулся с фоном и всем покрасом😀
🤩12custom 54249974839126350828🐳7🍌3🆒3
и последний(наверное) на сегодня поганец для мучачи люблю рендер мусорного бака и волосы этого милого…человека(?)🌟
🤩6custom 54249974839126350825🍌3🆒3custom 53778094427356773052
я когда увидел эту ОС с кучей нарядов, я выбрал именно этот, потому что мне в голову влетела картинка, что она типа такая заваливается в Джазз бар и ловит плохишей разбейте мою фантазию…🌟
🐳3🆒3custom 54249974839126350823🍌2🤩1custom 53778094427356773051
над шахматами постарался больше, чем над Шо а ваще шучу, он весь вкусным получился, впереди еще несколько артов, скоро закину в тт🤩
🤩5custom 53778094427356773055🐳3🍌2custom 54249974839126350822
в принципе можно уже кидать, что я накалякал🤩
🆒6🍌4🤩4custom 53778094427356773054custom 54249974839126350821
File, posted without a caption
🍌3custom 54249974839126350822custom 53778094427356773051
мои любимые паганцы🩸🖐 эта Slipknot
custom 54249974839126350826🤩4🆒3🍌1custom 53778094427356773051
всегда хотел чот с такими вайбами метро нарисовать
🆒9🤩5🍌2custom 53778094427356773052custom 54249974839126350822🐳1
Что ж, в принципе можно сказать что это начало для моего фан комикса по DC с моей ау которая не является каноном!!! Тут буквально будет слишком редкий пейринг с Дэмианом + это не про геройство, злодейство и тому подобное🤩 ps - что с качеством🕴️
🤩9custom 54249974839126350825🆒3🍌1🐳1custom 53778094427356773051
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @vyneling00. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 198,752 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“vino🍇” (@vyneling00), 57 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vyneling00.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.