Channel
@vxbcanon
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
32subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002287920169 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vxbcanon |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vxbcanon |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 32 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 32 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (1 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 287 |
| Reactions total | 124 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
124 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 38 | 30.6% | |
| custom 5375232775890681894 | 29 | 23.4% | |
| custom 5395849387710630005 | 26 | 21.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 16 | 12.9% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 8.87% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.806% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.806% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.806% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.806% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
На самом деле у меня траур. Прочекав сегодняшние новости я совсем отчаялась. Пусть у меня и не было реальных надежд на Яблоко, меня почему-то сильно задела новость о снятии этой партии с выборов. Я и без этого не хотела возвращаться в Россию, теперь ещё больше.
❤1💔1🤝1😭1
Я так подумала. Возможно мне было бы интересно учиться на журналиста/журналиста-расследователя. Конечно нельзя со 100% уверенностью сказать, что я буду хороша в этом, но мне как минимум было бы интересно этим заниматься. Я действительно просто обожаю составлять свои маленькие статьи, искать новую информацию и прочее
❤2custom 53752327758906818942custom 53958493877106300051
Заранее хочу предупредить, что завтра с 12 часов буду неактивна в течении трёх дней. Буду ехать в великую Российскую Федерацию 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🦅🦅🦅
❤🔥2custom 53958493877106300052❤1custom 53752327758906818941
Я очень люблю делать подробные разборы на что либо, но зачастую это никому не сдалось. Щас я вновь заинтересовалась делом Тимоти Хеллер. Я хочу взяться за личное расследование, ведь среди фанатов Мелани гуляет куча диз информации. Вот только кто в этом вообще будет заинтересован? Я реву. Будете терпеть это и читать. Просто потому что я люблю разбираться в подобных делах
custom 53752327758906818944❤2custom 53958493877106300051
Я заебалась уже столько лет терпеть его выходки. Почему же я именно терплю? Потому что этот хуесос буквально друг моего любимого стримера. Стинт сам говорил, что Братишкин вытворяет хуйню, но при этом его со временем оправдывают. Даже сам Стинт иногда. У меня конкретно подгорело, когда Мазеллов и Стинт продали сквад витуберш Братишкину. Именно ему. Чел заебал подсасываться к хайпу. Почему его мнение ещё считают автор…
❤3custom 53752327758906818941custom 53958493877106300051
🔎Когда уже отменят Братишкина
❤3custom 53752327758906818941custom 53958493877106300051
Сегодня кста дршка фнаф! Фнафу исполняется 12 лет и я в ахуе. Я помню как вышла вторая часть и как мой брат меня запугивал Марионеткой перед сном. Фнаф мне подарил кучу эмоций, опыта, даже друзей. Я рада, что франшиза жива по сей день (хотя пора заканчивать блять). Я в фд официально 8 лет и я этим горжусь 🥰
❤2🔥1custom 53752327758906818941custom 53958493877106300051
Рита попросила помочь зашарить за Мелани Мартинез. Я ждала этого ВСЮ СВОЮ ЖИЗНЬ. В какого монстра я превращаюсь, когда дело доходит до того в чём я шарю:
❤🔥4❤3custom 53958493877106300052custom 53752327758906818941
Я знаю что мои щп по нн блогерам не сдались, но хочется попиздеть. Я раньше новостником на ютубе была и осталась привычка высказываться по поводу всякого всплывшего белья. Потерпите пж
❤3custom 53752327758906818941custom 53958493877106300051
Почему Фурину One ещё смотрят? Чувиха поддерживает использование ии в коммерции, а так же особо не ищет информации по своими же видео и продвигает дизинфу в массы
❤2🤔1custom 53752327758906818941custom 53958493877106300051
Если же не рофлить, то у Барбары действительно есть песня, но не официальная, а фанатская. И нет, это не от жирного тюленя каркадия. Она называется "go Barbara go" и она участвовала в конкурсе фанатских хоё песен в году 2022(?). Она даже заняла какое-то место, но популярной не стала. Песня очень простенькая, но Барбаре по вайбу подходит
❤3❤🔥1custom 53752327758906818941custom 53958493877106300051
File, posted without a caption
❤2custom 53958493877106300052custom 53752327758906818941
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @vxbcanon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,145,945 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“‧₊˚ 🍒 ⋅𝙷𝙴𝙲𝙲𝙰 𝚂𝙷𝙿𓂃 ࣪ ִֶָ☾.” (@vxbcanon), 32 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vxbcanon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.