Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 4 days, net -851. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 174,624–175,731 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 23:18
174,752
-172
11 Aug 2026, 01:41
174,924
-167
10 Aug 2026, 00:01
175,091
-208
8 Aug 2026, 23:21
175,299
-251
7 Aug 2026, 20:05
175,550
-53
7 Aug 2026, 12:45
175,603
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:34
175,603
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
99
Videos
4
Links
2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
3,179 reactions across 20 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,290
40.6%
👍
245
7.71%
❤🔥
231
7.27%
🤣
195
6.13%
💯
178
5.60%
😁
178
5.60%
🔥
171
5.38%
🥰
158
4.97%
🎉
128
4.03%
🤩
100
3.15%
😍
87
2.74%
🐳
67
2.11%
👏
61
1.92%
💔
43
1.35%
👀
11
0.346%
😎
11
0.346%
🫡
8
0.252%
🕊
6
0.189%
🤷♀
6
0.189%
😐
3
0.094%
1 further kind
2
0.063%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,179reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 December 2025 to 26 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
39
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 20 we hold a reading for · 75%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vvvqv. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 December 2025 to 26 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
بمناسبة حلول عيد الأضحى المبارك، نتقدم إليكم بأصدق التهاني وأطيب التبريكات، سائلين الله تعالى أن يعيده عليكم وعلى عائلاتكم الكريمة بالخير واليُمن والبركات، وأن يجعل أيامكم أفراحا وسعادة وأمانا
كل عام وأنتم بألف خير،
وعيد أضحى مبارك عليكم جميعا.
يا "رأفت" اسمك في سما الطيب نبراس
والمعدن الصافي يبين اختباره
فيك الرزانة والوفاء ماله قياس
والجود في كفك يضيء بـ مناره
أنت الذي بالضيق تمسح على الراس
وقلبك على الأصحاب زاد اعتباره
من طاب أصله طاب ذكره مع الناس
و"رأفت" كسب في المرجلة كل غارة
يا نسل ناسٍ ترفع الرأس والساس
من يرتجي طيبك لقى فيك داره
لك في الحنايا ودّ ما يلحقه ياس
ولك في عيون الربع عزّ وبصارة
صح لسان الشاعر / اصيل شجاع الدين
غبي من يظن نفسه خسارة بينما هو مسمار صدى في حذائك يتوجب نزعه
❤58🤣25👍8😁4👏3💯3❤🔥2👀2
Signed ᖇᗩᖴᗩT
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vvvqv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
فديوهات انستا بدون حقوق @uy_v4 · 261,979 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 10 August 2026
شِغَف ْ | shaghaf @n1nnn · 277,435 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ᖇᗩᖴᗩT اقتباسات” (@vvvqv), 174,752 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vvvqv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.