4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 187–212 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 13:36
209
+14
7 Aug 2026, 05:03
195
no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:17
195
+5
6 Aug 2026, 02:35
190
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 27 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
615.5%
avg views ÷ 209 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,290
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.399%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
19 (27 January 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
3,859
Reactions total
15
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
180 reactions across 17 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
115
63.9%
🔥
13
7.22%
🤣
7
3.89%
🆒
6
3.33%
⚡
5
2.78%
💅
5
2.78%
💩
5
2.78%
😁
5
2.78%
❤🔥
4
2.22%
🕊
4
2.22%
🌚
3
1.67%
🐳
3
1.67%
🗿
2
1.11%
🥴
2
1.11%
🍾
1
0.556%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 180reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
если вы нас потеряли, мы нашлись!
новый выпуск подкаста «увидимся в театре» уже доступен на всех площадках без подписки и vpn
в гостях наш друг, автор тг канала «от чего дзинькает» женя покалюхин. 3 часа болтали про театр, про премьеры, которые отпечатались в памяти, про цены, которые делают больно, про будущее и прошлое, в общем — пили сидр
слушать можно тут:)
ps/ фото — креатив от гостя!
выбираем цитату для названия:
«никогда не читайте никаких отзывов до того, как смотреть спектакль»
«ты идешь на спектакль ради чего?»
«настолько плохо, что хорошо»
«я очень хочу, чтобы театральный бум закончился»
«театральный бум закончится, а все то, что вы делаете, останется»
«театр в прошлом»
гости нового выпуска — участники независимого театрального объединения «озеро» — гоша токаев и игорь царегородцев
хорошо посидели с ребятами, попили пиво и даже поговорили про театр. немного, но как есть. больше хихикали
вы, наверное, и так знаете, где можно посмотреть их спектакли и какие, но мы все-таки оставим список:)
москва, пространство внутри
ричард (андрей маник)
три сестры (андрей маник)
красная шапочка (…
эту неделю все только и делают, что говорят про нового гамлета в мхт, напомню, что у нас есть легендарный подкаст с режиссером спектакля - андреем гончаровым :)
вообще мне кажется это самое объемное присутствие андрея в медиа пространстве, чем мы с девочками очень гордимся!
послушайте, возможно вам это поможет понять то, что вы увидите на сцене :)
фото
послушала вчера еще раз наш выпуск с димой крестьянкиным, я вообще скромный человек, но выпуск так хорош, что аж захотелось написать, как я горжусь нами:)
лучшие гости, горящие театром, каждый с какой-то своей супер силой. очень рада, что у нас получаются такие легкие, искренние, теплые разговоры, только о том, что нам самим интересно. маша с полиной мои любимые и лучшие подкастеры в мире, мы с каждым выпуском уверен…
гость нового выпуска — Дмитрий Крестьянкин
Дима эксперт в области социального и документального театра, человек, который желает понять каждого и перенести услышанные истории на сцену. поговорили про его подход к театру, последние премьеры, музыку и многое другое.
ниже собрали все спектакли Димы, которые можно увидеть в Москве и не только:
Москва
«День закрытых дверей» Театр Наций
«Восьмиклассница» Театр Маяковского…
угадай следующего гостя (гостей*) подкаста по сообщению
⚡5❤5🗿2💩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @vteatretalk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
10 альтернативных вариантов на пост ректора Школы Студии Мхат:
Мурат Абулкатинов7%
Филипп Гуревич17%
Григорий Добрыгин20%
Саша Золотовицкий43%
Сергей Волков14%
Яна Кузина4%
Андрей Гончаров7%
Гоша Мнацаканов12%
Даниил Пугаев6%
Надя Кубайлат8%
The shares total 138%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 42,173 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“увидимся в театре” (@vteatretalk), 209 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vteatretalk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.