Channel
@vsouze
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
215subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001309688096 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vsouze |
| Description | Официальный канал модификации ВСоюзе Создатель - @ShizukuMurasaki Поддержать меня - https://qiwi.me/sovietvkdonate |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 15 September 2018— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vsouze |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:32 | 215 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 215 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 September 2018 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 August 2020. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
К сожалению, в марте - апреле работа по моду не смогла дойти до финального этапа и было принято решение прекратить разработку. Навсегда. На совсем, правда. И уже точно это будет последнее сообщение от меня. Я понимаю, что многие долго и упорно ждали возвращения, но увы, эта сфера в то время уже особо не вызывала у меня интереса из-за множества факторов (конкуренция, комьюнити и т.д.). Я надеялся, что если заняться эт…
Голосование закрыто. Фидбек получен. Работа скоро начнется и наверное на следующей неделе что-то и выйдет🌚
Голосовалку закрою через 24 часа (P.S. Основой мода будет @vtosters, скорее всего)
Стоит ли вернуть мод?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Прошло много времени, после выхода последней версии и всё равно интерес к данной модификации не утихает. Конечно, мне очень приятно, но всё же время таки не бесконечно и мне пришлось завершить работу на неопределенное время. Однако, я решил попробовать возродить данную "легенду". Просто киньте 999999 рублей 🌚🌚🌚🌚 (шутка!) На самом деле, я запущу голосование, чтобы понять, стоит ли оно того или нет, а там уже прикину
К сожалению, я не доглядываю порой и получаются такие нелепые ошибки, благо многие мне успешно репортят о проблемах и я стараюсь их оперативно исправить Те, кто сейчас сидят на 13.2 могут найти обновление лишь в ченджлогах или на канале, на данный момент
#release [Исправлено] Канал обновлений (Был выставлен канал с бета обновлениями...) Ещё пару докрасов
#release [Исправлено] Пофикшены некоторые места с синим цветом (имя историй, цвет ссылок) Пофикшены галочки от меня (раньше не отображались, сейчас будут)
Обновил список донатеров (Добавил нового)🌚
Список меценатов ВСоюзе и Sowa OwO @kelerne - 441 рубль @iTaysonLab — 80 рублей @YTKAB0BP - 50 рублей @alex1322_nn - 10 рублей «NPG» — 21 рубль «abselyam1337» — 9 рублей @extreames - 9 рублей @es3n1n - 5 рублей @f0x3d - 2 рубля (Пишу здесь, т.к. с телеграфом наблюдались проблемы, а список из вк был недоступен никому (к сожалению, узнал об этом лишь сейчас). Данный список теперь будет как пост на канале и будет обнов…
И да, спасибо за 200+ подписчиков, я не думал что это когда-то случится🌚
По поводу частоты обновлений: Немного трудновато теперь содержать два мода и поддерживать их дальнейшее развитие, но на второй модификации я учусь переносить быстрее базу и стараюсь вовремя делать обновления. Перенос на 0.7c был осуществлён за вечер, благодаря Sowa OwO теперь я научился делать это значительно быстрее, поэтому надеюсь следующие переносы будут своевременными
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vsouze. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Стоит ли вернуть мод?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 September 2018 to 23 August 2020. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 738,590 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@vsouze named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ВСоюзе (Советский ВКонтакте)” (@vsouze), 215 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vsouze.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.