Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 38 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 504–522 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 16:18
506
-4
10 Sept 2026, 12:38
510
-2
2 Sept 2026, 02:45
512
-3
25 Aug 2026, 08:52
515
-4
17 Aug 2026, 20:47
519
-1
11 Aug 2026, 18:08
520
no change
11 Aug 2026, 15:16
520
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 43s
Average length
52s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
42 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
15
35.7%
👍
13
31.0%
❤
12
28.6%
👏
2
4.76%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2024 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
...📱 Uber
🛍 Маркетплейсами
💳 Онлайн-банками
🏠 Бронируем жильё у совершенно незнакомых людей
То, что когда-то казалось невозможным, стало обычной частью жизни.
Но есть убеждения, которые мы до сих пор считаем истиной...
Не потому, что проверяли.
А просто потому, что так привыкли думать.
Например:
✈️ «Путешествия — это дорого.»
А что, если это убеждение устарело точно так же, как когда-то устарело правило:
🚗 «Никог…
🌍 Мир давно изменился.
Но наши убеждения — не всегда успевают за ним.
📜 Интересный факт.
Когда-то родители учили детей:
🚗 «Никогда не садись в машину к незнакомцу.»
И это был абсолютно правильный совет.
Потому что незнакомый человек действительно мог представлять опасность.
⏳ Прошло всего несколько десятилетий...
Сегодня миллионы людей каждый день открывают приложение, нажимают одну кнопку и спокойно садятся в м…
3 месяца назад Таня увидела меня совершенно случайно через рассылку и зашла ко мне на разбор с вопросами:
• Как привлечь первых подписчиков и клиентов?
• Как продавать без подтверждённого опыта и отзывов?
• Как эффективно продвигать себя и свои продукты?
• Как это делать без бюджета?
• Как поднять цену на свой продукт больше 100000 рублей?
Я каждый день слышу эти страхи и сомнения...,
но решение этих вопросов е…
💫Заблуждение № 1💫
Чтобы больше зарабатывать - нужно больше работать!
🌟Чтобы зарабатвать больше в сфере услуг, нужно правильно себя презентовать!
Что бы клиент принял решение обратиться к вам:
нужно ознакомить клиента с вашим продуктом,;
с вами, как личностью;
с результатами ваших работ;
закрыть максимально все возражения клиента.
Для этого нужно сделать качественную упаковку и личного бренда и продукта в соц се…
Чувствуете, что уперлись в потолок? Вы не одиноки.
Привет, друзья! 👋 я рассказала вам о Татьяне, которая, как и многие из вас, столкнулась с ощущением, что больше не может расти, несмотря на все усилия.
Сегодня я хочу рассказать вам, как она справилась с этим ощущением «финансового потолка».
Татьяна была профессионалом в области здорового тела, работала с утра до вечера, но как бы она ни старалась, доходы не росли…
Как Анжелика привлекла 6 клиентов и нашла 2 партнера за 1 день с помощью моей методики
Основной текст:
Привет! Меня зовут Юлия Жаркова, и сегодня я хочу поделиться с вами историей, которая может вдохновить вас на решительные действия.
Когда Анжелика обратилась ко мне, она была на распутье: клиентов не хватало, старые подходы перестали работать, и ей казалось, что она зашла в тупик. Но она была готова действовать и …
Почему ваши доходы не растут, несмотря на все усилия?
Привет, я знаю, каково это — чувствовать, что ты работаешь на пределе, но доходы остаются на одном месте. Вы стараетесь изо всех сил, предлагаете своим клиентам качественные услуги, но почему-то это не приносит тех финансовых результатов, которых вы ожидаете.
Давайте поговорим честно. Основная причина, по которой ваши доходы не растут, — это страх изменений и со…
🔥3👍2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vseProkosmetologiyu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как правильно настроить тг канал и как вести контент57%
Как дорого упаковать услугу (продукт) и узнать кто его купит13%
Быстрые бесплатные способы получения клиентов26%
задать тему в коментариях4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2024 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Новости правда @newsprav_da · 184,495 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ВСЕ PRO КОСМЕТОЛОГИЮ” (@vseProkosmetologiyu), 506 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vseProkosmetologiyu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
