National news — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 8 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 99 of the 99 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,028 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 97 days, net -948. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 69,999–71,231 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 12:59
70,141
-20
9 Nov 2026, 21:01
70,161
-23
8 Nov 2026, 11:16
70,184
-17
7 Nov 2026, 07:47
70,201
-11
6 Nov 2026, 09:07
70,212
-16
5 Nov 2026, 09:25
70,228
-15
4 Nov 2026, 11:04
70,243
-6
3 Nov 2026, 14:11
70,249
-7
2 Nov 2026, 11:17
70,256
-12
1 Nov 2026, 11:06
70,268
-7
31 Oct 2026, 11:18
70,275
-14
30 Oct 2026, 12:26
70,289
-27
29 Oct 2026, 10:35
70,316
-24
28 Oct 2026, 06:46
70,340
-31
27 Oct 2026, 07:51
70,371
+74
26 Oct 2026, 06:51
70,297
+83
25 Oct 2026, 03:49
70,214
-11
24 Oct 2026, 00:58
70,225
+2
20 Oct 2026, 20:01
70,223
-4
19 Oct 2026, 21:15
70,227
first reading
Engagement
1,688 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 198 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.92%
avg views ÷ 70,141 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,450
519 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.805%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
519
of 1,688 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 473 of 519 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
1,688 (5 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
1,792,736
Reactions total
13,513
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 12:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2h 14m
Average length
47s
Measured directly from 173 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
26,415 reactions across 897 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
8,128
30.8%
🤬
4,803
18.2%
🙏
4,661
17.6%
😢
2,271
8.60%
😱
1,673
6.33%
🤯
1,378
5.22%
💯
1,023
3.87%
🤣
475
1.80%
🤨
468
1.77%
🤷♂
370
1.40%
😁
357
1.35%
🤔
326
1.23%
🔥
193
0.731%
👍
192
0.727%
👏
36
0.136%
🕊
32
0.121%
🥰
21
0.08%
😍
7
0.027%
👌
1
0.004%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 923 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26,415 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 14 September 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vrn36v. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 14 September 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
2.30%
23 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
23
posts carrying an erid · 23 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
2,330
over 23 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,970
over 977 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzquX26Cn
1
3 November 2026
3 November 2026
2VtzqvgevK7
1
8 October 2026
8 October 2026
2Vtzqvjjksw
1
28 October 2026
28 October 2026
2Vtzqw3SUZJ
1
16 September 2026
16 September 2026
2VtzqwLBxHB
1
27 October 2026
27 October 2026
2Vtzqwce7wT
1
12 October 2026
12 October 2026
2Vtzqwgcz1z
1
2 October 2026
2 October 2026
2Vtzqx6fUx5
1
11 October 2026
11 October 2026
2VtzqxDpPnd
1
24 October 2026
24 October 2026
2VtzqxY73sB
1
13 October 2026
13 October 2026
2VtzqxaTjGS
1
4 November 2026
4 November 2026
2Vtzqxbu9KJ
1
29 September 2026
29 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 11 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 14 September 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 17 of 519 posts held from the last 30 days (3.28%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Вандалы разрушили световую инсталляцию на въезде в Нововоронеж
В ночь на 17 октября вандалы повредили световую инсталляцию, изображающую название Нововоронежа. На видео с камеры наблюдения видно, как группа молодых людей фотографировалась около конструкции, а затем один из них залез на букву и сломал её. В завершение инцидента один из участников пнул повреждённый элемент.
Вскоре нарушителей нашли по записи с камеры…
В «Пятёрочке» обнаружили кота, который устроил себе лежбище в холодильнике с колбасой.
Покупатели заметили пушистого «ревизора» прямо на полке с колбасными изделиями. Судя по его довольной морде, он явно чувствовал себя на своём месте.
Теперь свежесть и сроки годности продуктов находятся под надёжным присмотром этого хвостатого сотрудника
К нам обратились жильцы дома Южно-Моравской, 74:
"Здравствуйте, уважаемая редакция!
Обращаются к вам жители многоквартирного дома по адресу: город Воронеж, ул. Южно-Моравская, д. 74. Мы оказались в безвыходной ситуации и просим вас о помощи, так как наша управляющая компания проявляет абсолютное равнодушие и ненадлежащим образом относится к содержанию дома.
Наш дом буквально разрушается на глазах, а на все заявки мы…
В сгоревшей квартире по адресу Лизюкова, 14, обнаружили тело 91-летней женщины
Около полуночи загорелась двухкомнатная квартира на девятом этаже дома по улице Лизюкова.
Пожар был ликвидирован примерно через 17 минут. Для безопасности из здания эвакуировали десять человек.
В результате возгорания комната и коридор квартиры были сильно повреждены. На месте пожара обнаружено тело пожилой женщины.
Присмотрели диван, кровать или шкаф?
Проверьте цены 11.11 в НОНТОН 👀
Если давно планировали обновить мебель, сейчас хороший повод вернуться к этой идее.
В НОНТОН — большой выбор мебели для дома: диваны, кровати, шкафы, кухни и товары для дома.
Загляните в подборку и посмотрите, что можно выбрать для своей квартиры.
👉 Смотреть предложения
В Воронеже пропала Иванова Любовь, ей 12 лет. С 10 ноября 2026 года её местонахождение неизвестно.
Если у вас есть информация о пропавшей, пожалуйста, позвоните по бесплатному номеру горячей линии отряда: 88007005452 или наберите 112
Воронежец ответит в суде за смерть мужчины у храма.
Обвиняемый оттолкнул пьяного горожанина, чтобы тот не зашел на территорию храма.
Мужчина упал, ударился головой об асфальт и скончался.
Возбуждено уголовное дело.
Ноябрь - время замедлиться… Еще нет предновогодней суеты, но и гонка за теплыми солнечными днями уже закончена. Время книг, пледов и разных мыслей…
Автор: Тамара Буянова
Жители Борового жалуются, что стоянка фур в микрорайоне выходит из‑под контроля!
Ситуация становится всё опаснее — фур не просто не стало меньше, их стало ещё больше. И это не просто неудобство, а реальная угроза.
Что прямо сейчас портит жизнь и ставит под удар безопасность:
Большегрузы занимают проезжую часть. Это не просто «тесно», это нарушение ПДД и создание аварийных условий для всего потока.
Из‑за стоящих…
Когда мечта становится реальностью — и это по-настоящему вдохновляет! 🎉
21‑летняя Яна Лоленко из Лисок доказала: талант не спрячешь, а любовь к музыке сильнее любых рамок. Девушка, которая каждый день учит детей петь в школе №10, вдруг оказалась на одной сцене с Ириной Дубцовой — и не просто в качестве поклонницы, а как настоящая артистка! 🎶
На юбилейном сезоне шоу «Ты супер! Десять лет спустя» Яна исполнила песню …
❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,688 posts we hold for @vrn36v. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@vrn36v edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
4 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @vrn36v as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
19 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
27 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
13 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Куда пойти в Воронеже | Афиша Воронежа @go_vrn · 75,812 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
Типичный Воронеж | Настоящий @Voronezh4 · 83,505 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 August 2026
ВОРОНЕЖСКОЕ НЕБО @nebovrn36 · 153,885 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 13 August 2026
Тревожный Воронеж @tre_voronezh · 51,801 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 25 August 2026
Инцидент Воронеж @vrinc · 64,238 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 21 August 2026
Большой воронежский @voronezh_news_36 · 83,613 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 August 2026
Мой и твой Воронеж @mtv36 · 190,184 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 11 August 2026
Новости Воронежа и Области @smi_voronezh · 208,485 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 11 August 2026
Воронеж Сейчас @voronezh1ru · 27,854 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
Регион-36 (Воронеж с огоньком) @voronezh_r36 · 73,348 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
Воронеж №1 @vrn01 · 72,782 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
Т-Воронеж | Типичный | Новости Воронежа @typicalvoronezh · 373,546 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 10 August 2026
Жесть Воронеж @zhest_voronezh_136 · 61,939 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 22 August 2026
МОЁ! Online. Воронеж @moeonline · 38,012 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
МЧС Воронежской области @mchs36 · 27,251 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 September 2026
Москва | Новости @msk_new777 · 30,192 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 6 September 2026
Блокнот Воронеж @bloknot_vrn · 64,635 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 August 2026
Сетка | Воронеж здесь и сейчас @setkagram · 23,267 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 September 2026
TV Губерния. Воронеж @tvgubernia · 20,273 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 September 2026
Гусев @gusev_36 · 130,320 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 August 2026
ЧС Приграни́чье @rschs_prigranichie · 27,890 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 9 September 2026
ЧП Россия | Новости | Обстрелы | Иран @chp_rus24 · 74,290 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
ФК «Факел» Воронеж @pfcfakel · 39,840 Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Воронеж VRN ️” (@vrn36v), 70,141 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vrn36v.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.