Channel
@vremyaknigi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
80subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001624887975 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vremyaknigi |
| Description | Полезная сторона интернета здесь 💻 Публикую посты о сайтах, инструментах и подходах к задачам, которыми пользуюсь сама. Вдохновляюсь и вдохновляю других 🍰 Рекламы нет. Любой восторг — это мои личные эмоции) |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vremyaknigi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 80 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 80 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 31 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
73 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5291820679891550229 | 27 | 37.0% | |
| ⚡ | 22 | 30.1% | |
| custom 5850636641391087080 | 11 | 15.1% | |
| custom 5850443977748123541 | 9 | 12.3% | |
| custom 5429465203383234409 | 4 | 5.48% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 28 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В связи с новым законом о запрете англицизмов с 1 марта — решила сделать старославянский словарь☀️ Код от Gemini, сайт создавала через Lovable Ссылочка → Если что, это просто кек и баловство, заодно, навык вайбкодинга тренирую 😳
⚡3custom 52918206798915502292custom 54294652033832344091
Если вы послушали музыку, то должны были оценить хорошее качество (не считая нескольких странно произнесённых слов). Но есть и минусы. Самый главный — трек длится всего 30 секунд. На запрос «пришли полный трек» присылает новую генерацию, также 30-секундную. А если спросить, может ли генерировать длиннее, отвечает: На данный момент я нахожусь на этапе Beta-тестирования, и мои технические возможности позволяют создав…
⚡2custom 58504439777481235412
Тут новый инструмент по созданию музыки появился... И знаете, у кого? У Gemini (тот, что от Google). На главном экране, где можно запустить новый чат, появилась кнопка «Создать музыку». Ну, я и нажала) Выбрала думающий режим и написала первое, что пришло в голову: Финальный саундтрек романтического фильма, в котором всё закончилось хорошо, и пару ждёт счастливое будущее и интересные моменты. Музыка должна вдохнов…
⚡3custom 58506366413910870801
Следить за ценами на продукты на одном сайте. Что? Да! Это моя первая реакция, когда я наткнулась на этот сайт: https://pricetuner.ru/ 🙄😮 Короче, он в первую очередь для ритейлеров, чтобы следить за ценообразованием конкурентов, но кто нам мешает пользоваться инструментом для каких-то своих размышлений, правильно?) Нужна регистрация, но она бесплатная. После этого можно увидеть медианные и минимальные рыночные цен…
⚡4custom 58506366413910870802
По голосам негусто, но я всё равно расскажу 🤭 Такие подкасты можете делать даже вы, причём на основе любой информации: нашли в интернете, написали сами, загрузили сразу несколько источников 🎧 Собственно, этот подкаст я взяла отсюда Мне кажется, это прекрасная возможность — запоминать что-то полезное и важное через разные форматы ✨ Попробуйте сами →
custom 58504439777481235413⚡2
Это настоящие подкастеры?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
File, posted without a caption
Вот несколько кадров из первой эпохи
custom 58504439777481235413⚡1custom 58506366413910870801
Что общего у необъяснимости, мемов и истории? Один человек — Сергей Дружко 🛸 С 2005 по 2008 год он вёл передачу «Необъяснимо, но факт» с типа документальными сюжетами обо всём загадочном, включая инопланетян и аномалии) (поставьте реакцию, если это ваше детство) В 2017 запустил интернет-шоу «Дружко Шоу» на YouTube, где обозревал мемы) А в прошлом году запустил новое — «Цивилизация», где за 10 дней несколько людей…
custom 52918206798915502293⚡1custom 54294652033832344091
Крутяк из 2005 года 🗿
custom 52918206798915502292custom 58506366413910870802
Не удержался и сгенерировал из аудио трека ностальгия-кор песню 🗿
custom 58506366413910870803⚡2
Если непонятно, но очень интересно 😁, то советую два источника: 1⃣про оунершипа — https://t.me/glvrdru/6292 Целое исследование от «Клуба главредов» Ильяхова (чтобы разобраться в нём, главредом при этом быть не обязательно 🤭) 2⃣про дополненного профессионала — https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tsifrovoy-kentavr-sovmestnoe-obuchenie-cheloveka-i-ii-v-universitete/viewer Научная статья про обучение студентов совместно …
custom 52918206798915502294⚡1custom 54294652033832344091
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @vremyaknigi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Это настоящие подкастеры?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 28 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ну привет, интернет” (@vremyaknigi), 80 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vremyaknigi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.