Так, давно ничего не писал Особо нет активности здесь, поэтому в Инстаграме тусуюсь😎 Но щас один ролик закину сюда тоже. Мало ли, вдруг чья-то мечта исполнится
😁3👍2
Signed Alexey Napalkov

Channel
@vputnap
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,003subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001440530402 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vputnap |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vputnap |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 1,003 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 1,005 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:13 | 1,006 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 1,007 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 1,008 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:51 | 1,007 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 1,006 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 1,006 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:21 | 1,007 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 24 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
114 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 50 | 43.9% | |
| ❤ | 34 | 29.8% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 13.2% | |
| 😍 | 7 | 6.14% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 2.63% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 2.63% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 1.75% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Так, давно ничего не писал Особо нет активности здесь, поэтому в Инстаграме тусуюсь😎 Но щас один ролик закину сюда тоже. Мало ли, вдруг чья-то мечта исполнится
😁3👍2
Signed Alexey Napalkov
Ладно, есть ещё вариант, при котором можно всё же попасть на этот водопад в конце месяца Кому интересно — пишите в личку @alexeynapakov
🔥4😍1
Signed Alexey Napalkov
Водопад Чараур в этом году в конце июня завораживающе мощный🔥🔥🔥 Это реально уникальное явление, потому что таким он не был долгие годы Но ты увидишь этот водопад только из этого видео и до конца даже не осознаешь, не прочувствуешь его масштабы🤷♂️ Хотя я предупреждал, что июнь – лучшее время для путешествия по Южному Дагестану😊 Водопад Чараур (Чадавур) имеет высоту 250 метров После аномальных весенних осадков Да…
🔥8😢2❤1😍1
Signed Alexey Napalkov
Сегодня на закате😍 Я говорил, что июнь — самый любимый мой месяц в горах
🔥19❤2😍1
Signed Alexey Napalkov
Тем временем в Южном Дагестане буквально лучшее время в году♥️
❤13🔥4😍3
Signed Alexey Napalkov
🏔️Пабаку — пирамидальная гора в Дагестане, которую стоит хотя бы раз в жизни увидеть своими глазами А если ещё и подняться на неё — это может стать одним из ярких моментов твоей жизни🔥 Мы тут на днях ещё раз оценили её характер: от дождя, снега и града, до ласкового тепла и красивейшего звёздного неба😍 Погода в горах непредсказуема, но июль — гораздо более стабильное время Именно в июле собираю группу для похода …
🔥11👍5
Signed Alexey Napalkov
Пару дней назад красиво и выйбово сходили к подножию легендарной вершины Пабаку🏔️🔥 5-9 июля идём сюда снова. Будем много ходить, чилить, перезагружаться и подниматься на вершину, которую называют дагестанским Кайласом Кто с нами? Будет — незабываемо♥️
❤18🔥3👍1😍1
Signed Alexey Napalkov
Всё это было путешествие "Весна в Южном Дагестане" И даже в конце апреля и начале мая это было незабываемо🔥 Однако самое лучшее время для посещения Юждага — это июнь Погнали? Время на принятие решения уже нет😊 либо сегодня-завтра кто-то из вас решится, либо прекращаю набор (потому что сроки оформления пропусков в приграничную зону ограничены) 📅Даты путешествия: 21 — 26 июня 1 — 5 октября Если ты с нами, пиши мн…
👍7💔3🔥1
Signed Alexey Napalkov
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @vputnap. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@vputnap named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VPUTNAP” (@vputnap), 1,003 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vputnap.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.