С Рождеством, ребят!
👍6🎄4☃1

Channel
@vpolusne
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
54subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001411511241 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vpolusne |
| Created | 29 December 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vpolusne |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 54 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 55 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:40 | 55 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 29 December 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
28 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 15 | 53.6% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 14.3% | |
| 🎄 | 4 | 14.3% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 7.14% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 7.14% | |
| ☃ | 1 | 3.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2022 to 6 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
С Рождеством, ребят!
👍6🎄4☃1
Кроим ДНК на Python — CRISPR gRNA finder Часть II: Скоринг, off-target и реальный ген https://habr.com/ru/articles/982876/
Кроим ДНК на Python: CRISPR gRNA finder Часть I: Введение и базовый поиск https://habr.com/ru/articles/982664/ После долгого отсутствия
👍2
Video, posted without a caption
Как я тут недавно сообщал - весь в работе, а потому времени нет, в т.ч. и на статейки. НО рано или поздно всё заканчивается, вот и мой период "перегрузки" тоже медленно уходит в туман. Заинтересовался темой групповых/роевых стратегий использования БПЛА, в т.ч. вместе с нейросетками. Нашёл пару статей и прикладываю их тут, возможно в ближайшее время переведу, что-то увлекательное. Канадское из бородатого 2019 года: …
Решения о жизни и смерти на поле боя Часть I (оригинал - en): https://warontherocks.com/2021/01/machine-learning-and-life-and-death-decisions-on-the-battlefield/ Часть I (перевод - ru): https://habr.com/ru/post/709424/ Примечание: статья и в оригинале содержит достаточно "тяжёлые" (сложные, комплексные и, иногда, с ошибками) конуструкции при рассуждениях, так что если вы заметите, какую-то не состыовку в переводе …
👍1
С Рождеством, папещики!
🍾2
Так, я покинул родные пенаты, поэтому до конца недели будет, либо перевод того, что обещал выше, либо моя статейка🫡
Про военные дела и тактический ИИ. Финал. Часть IV (оригинал - EN): https://www.general-staff.com/computational-military-reasoning-part-4-learning/ Часть IV (RU): https://habr.com/ru/post/708914/
И кстати, насчёт темы воентех ИИ в русскоязычном пространстве я оказался не совсем прав. Мне тут подсказали, что в INJOIT выходила интересная статья. Я пока не ознакомился, но кому интересно можете почитать. P.S. Выходила конечно сравнительно недавно (в 2022 году), поэтому и пропустил, каюсь.
🔥2
Недавно в комментариях под публикацией на Хабре зашёл разговор о моральном духе, мол "как подать конечному исполнителю решение ИИ по которому, оный исполнитель погибает с большой вероятностью, либо его подразделение должно отойти от позиций". Я постарался на скорую руку ответить что-то внятное, но такой сложный вопрос безусловно требует более развернутого рассуждения с примерами и мнениями, поэтому думаю, что после …
👍1
Про военные дела и тактический ИИ Часть III (оригинал): https://www.general-staff.com/computational-military-reasoning-tactical-artificial-intelligence-part-3/ Часть III (RU): https://habr.com/ru/post/708856/
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @vpolusne. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“полусон” (@vpolusne), 54 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vpolusne.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.