3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 275–276 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 16:16
276
+1
7 Aug 2026, 08:01
275
no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:48
275
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.6%
avg views ÷ 276 subscribers
Avg views / post
62.3
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
13 (1 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
810
Reactions total
72
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
72 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
25
34.7%
🔥
18
25.0%
👍
15
20.8%
🙏
10
13.9%
🫡
3
4.17%
💔
1
1.39%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 13 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vpeklo_dmd. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Это не кино. Это один час из их жизни.
Без криков «ура». Без громких слов. Просто включите звук и смотрите.
Здесь нет декораций и актеров — только те, кто выбрал спасать, даже когда вокруг война.
Один час. 60 минут ада, где каждая секунда решает, вернется ли боец домой. Где руки медиков работают быстрее, чем пулеметная очередь. Где усталость отступает перед одной целью — вытащить, зашить, откачать, подарить еще од…
Встреча с настоящим героем.
Вчера выпала честь пообщаться с действующим бойцом. Это уникальный опыт — смотреть в глаза человеку, который каждый день смотрит в лицо опасности ради нашего спокойствия.
Спасибо за теплую беседу, за вашу открытость и мудрость. За то, что несмотря ни на что, вы сохраняете веру в лучшее.
Главное спасибо — за защиту нашего дома. За нашу землю, наше небо и наше будущее.
Вечная благодарнос…
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴
Сегодня — особый вечер! 👋
Мы рады сообщить, что сегодня в гости к нам приезжает боец, подразделению которого мы уже давно и системно помогаем. Это отличная возможность не просто услышать рассказы «оттуда», а пообщаться лично, задать вопросы и сказать спасибо вживую.
Приглашаем всех желающих присоединиться к нашей встрече! Ждем вас:
📍 Адрес: ЦВПВ, ул. Текстильщиков, д. 1/1
🕗 Время: сбор в 20:00
Важное ус…
Доброго утра всем.🤗
Полевой ремонт.
Чихает движок? Плюнь на диагностику. У нас здесь своя «скорая». Спирт в бак — и никаких проблем с октановым числом.
Гражданские говорят: «Это вредно для двигателя». А мы отвечаем: «Это вредно для врага, когда мы вовремя приезжаем на позицию». Техника слушается, парни улыбаются. Так и работаем.💪💪💪
#НашиЛюди #боевойнастрой #Работаем #сво
Крестились мы, над головой свистело,
Ползти вперёд не оставалось сил.
И каждый снова Господа просил,
Не оказаться на кресте прицела.
А в древние века крестилась Русь,
И слава Господу, что всё же покрестилась,
Водой, не кровью, от грехов отмылась,
И Библию учила наизусть.
Сегодня всё доступно, лишь читай,
Но мы не платим два гроша за вечность.
Боимся, что накачанные плечи
Сломаются под тяжестью Креста.
Владеть бы м…
«С Днём ВДВ, братья! Быть десантником — значит носить в груди горячее сердце, а за плечами — стальные нервы. Вы — щит страны и опора для товарищей. Пусть удача всегда прикрывает ваш тыл, здоровье будет богатырским, а дома всегда ждут с победой. Сил вам и ясного неба!»
Огромное спасибо Анне, Натальи, и особенно Даниле🙏🙏🙏
Обратите внимание, бойцы помогают своим братьям по оружию. Держитесь парни💪🙏
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @vpeklo_dmd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 312,608 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“V_Самое Пекло” (@vpeklo_dmd), 276 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vpeklo_dmd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.