Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Вова про Звуки

Channel

Вова про Звуки

@vovaizvuki

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

195subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001487030398
TypeChannel
Username@vovaizvuki
DescriptionПишу про музыку и про то как она создается
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/vovaizvuki

Growth

19510 Aug 2026, 08:47 — 195 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 09:00 — 195 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 08:4710 Aug 2026, 09:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 194–196 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 09:00195no change
10 Aug 2026, 08:47195first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.2%
avg views ÷ 195 subscribers
Avg views / post
68.7
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held20 (10 February 202627 July 2026)
Views total206
Reactions total32
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
30
Videos
3
Links
58

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

132 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4030.3%
🔥3526.5%
👍1410.6%
❤‍🔥118.33%
🤓107.58%
😁86.06%
💯75.30%
👏32.27%
10.758%
🙏10.758%
🤝10.758%
🤨10.758%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 14:39 UTC56 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ну и вот с таких приколов ржу

😁5🤨1

27 Jul 2026, 14:30 UTC58 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Что-то я слишком долго лежал в направлении делания контента Сейчас потихоньку ползу Вообще, конечно, странная фигня, выбирать текстовый формат для того, чтобы рассказывать о музыке. Но с текстами у меня всегда было лучше, чем с тем чтобы снимать какие-то видео Хотя вот эфиры у меня всегда получались бомбическими (Не знаю даже, как это совместить) Все потому что на эфирах ты все равно общаешься с живыми людьми. И в те

🔥6👍4

20 Jul 2026, 07:10 UTC92 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Охренеть, Вы ещё тут

🤓10😁3💯21

13 May 2026, 11:06 UTC173 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Музыка, кстати, доставляет нам удовольствие, как минимум потому что мозгу нашему очень нравится угадывать что же будет дальше Как только мозг настраивается на эту самую предсказуемость, как только слышит повторяющиеся паттерны и структуры, с помощью которых он может угадать развитие - он кайфует В прямом смысле, потому что нейробилогически так устроен что дает порцию подкрепления каждый раз, когда удается предугад

8🔥5👏3💯2

15 Apr 2026, 07:08 UTC187 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Короче, УАД выкатили охеренный бандл бесплатных плагинов Я эти плагины два года собирал на акциях, и вот они все вместе и все бесплатные Скажу честно, большинство из них в каждом моем проекте Да, тяжелые. Но звучат охуенно Вот ссылка. Всем рекомендую https://www.uaudio.com/products/uad-explore-free

🔥32👍1

8 Apr 2026, 09:04 UTC179 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Движение в предлагаемых условиях Я только за свою жизнь видел множество различных перетрубаций и турбулентности. Одно отключают, другое навязывают, третье просто исчезает из жизни. Привычных ход действий нарушается Стили музыки меняются. Мода меняется. Концертные площадки закрываются. Да господи, друзья отваливаются и с работы увольняют Это намного больше похоже на настоящую жизнь, чем то, когда у тебя все стабиль

10🔥2

6 Apr 2026, 06:05 UTC105 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Щас мне инет проведут на новую квартиру и я вернусь

🔥5🤝1

27 Mar 2026, 07:53 UTC156 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🔥42

27 Mar 2026, 07:53 UTC147 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Думаю всем полезно будет Ответ на вот такой вопрос: «Если мои скиллы сомнительны И когда я делаю песню она сильно меняется Что делать?»

🔥4

24 Mar 2026, 14:21 UTC147 viewsread 10 August 2026

Коты, а с чем у вас вот прям запары? С песнями? С музыкой? С тем, как второй куплет написать после первого? Ну вот прям не про продвижение и не «денег нет никто не слушает», потому что это все таки долгосрочный процесс, а именно творческие проблемы, есть какие-то?

17 Mar 2026, 05:53 UTC172 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://youtu.be/v6HoOOp5fII?si=-cDPDQVsR-qOVmO1 Вот это смотреть Дисклеймер: если у вас неустойчивая психика, то смотреть не надо, конечно, но если вы любите научпоп и хоть немного шарите за всякие раздувы про эволюцию и психофизиологию, и при этом вы музыкант - смотреть прям обязательно Ну и это видео вполне объясняет всякие явления типа гангнам стайл и сигмабой, да и вообще многие вещи про музыку и заевшие песн

👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vovaizvuki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,188,156 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Вова про Звуки” (@vovaizvuki), 195 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vovaizvuki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.