Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Школа Воска Академии Пробужденной Силы

Channel

Школа Воска Академии Пробужденной Силы

@vosk_ezoschool

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

340subscribers

+20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001687164268
TypeChannel
Username@vosk_ezoschool
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/vosk_ezoschool

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@ezoschool1/323416 Jul 2026, 17:30 UTC@vosk_ezoschool/883 · this entry16 Jul 2026, 17:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@ezoschool1/32451 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC@vosk_ezoschool/894 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@ezoschool15 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (32)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 9 comparable posts for this entry, running 23 June 2026 to 1 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @ezoschool1. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

3203403306 August 2026 — 320 subscribers6 August 2026 — 320 subscribers24 August 2026 — 322 subscribers8 September 2026 — 339 subscribers17 September 2026 — 340 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 42 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 317–343 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 10:01340+1
8 Sept 2026, 12:35339+17
24 Aug 2026, 00:25322+2
6 Aug 2026, 22:01320no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:48320first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

131 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8967.9%
🔥4131.3%
🙏10.763%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
100
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 9 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vosk_ezoschool. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC67 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня начался один из восьми праздников Колеса года, открывающий осеннюю триаду (Ламмас, Мабон, Самайн), знаменующий переход от молодости к зрелости. Это время для осмысления жизни, перехода от состояния многообразия к потребности в истине. Название Ламмас происходит от древнеанглийского hlaf‑mas, что означает «праздник хлеба». В этот день пекли первый хлеб из нового зерна и приносили его в дар земле, предкам, дру

14🔥2

29 Jul 2026, 10:44 UTC290 views16 reactions100 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня наступает одно из самых мощных полнолуний года. Поскольку полнолуние, по сути, является пиком проявления силы, то совершенно очевидно, что в сочетании с пиком лета оно несёт нам самые большие возможности, самый большой размах, который грех не использовать для формирования намерения, да и в принципе для любых магических преобразований. В интернете можно найти много разных названий этого полнолуния, но я предл

13🔥2🙏1

26 Jul 2026, 20:58 UTC107 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Увы, видео не передает всю энергетику этой работы, выставленной в «Зотов»-центре, но это действительно прекрасно! Ничего не добавлено — только цвет и свет. Я видела много арт-проектов с использованием пчеловодческой атрибутики, и ни один не впечатлил. А в этом точно что-то есть.

11🔥7

21 Jul 2026, 11:19 UTC417 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Хочу вам показать как выглядит работа свечи с человеком, находящимся в состоянии глубокого эмоционального раздрая и событийной дистабилизации. Эту чистку делаю я. Человек — муж клиентки. Понятно, что свеча стоит не здесь (перенесла для фото), в этой чистке у меня задействованы также руны. Это первый слой чистки, поэтому ее можно считать диагностической. Что имеем, по словам клиентки? Полный «букет»: неудачи по всем

14🔥3

17 Jul 2026, 10:15 UTC204 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Свечи пика лета Самые горячие, самые жаркие, активированы солнцем и будут работать как хороший аккумулятор. В эти дни мы особенно советуем вам заказать у нас 🔹Красные 🟢Зеленые ⏺Молочные 🟠Оранжевые ⚫️Черные ⏺️Болотные 🟡и свечи из натурального псковского воска. Лучшие для того, чтобы воспринять любой замысел и любую программу и исполнить любое ваше намерение. Также в продаже набор ЧИСТКА ЛЕТА для дома или рабочего

🔥9

16 Jul 2026, 17:30 UTC122 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Полугодовой прогноз. Коррекция диагностики года. Друзья, каждый год, в первых числах января, я делаю для своих клиентов годовой анализ предстоящего года. Это большая работа, где я использую свои навыки энерго и телесного терапевта и профайлера (чтение тела), астропсихолога, а также делаю некоторые просмотры с помощью рун и таро. После анализа провожу консультацию. Можно относиться к этому по-разному, кто-то больше

9

28 Jun 2026, 07:52 UTC187 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Друзья, хочу обратить ваше внимание на свой новый курс! Курс очень непростой. Хоть в нем и присутствует слово магия, он далеко не только для тех, кто связан с какой бы то ни было магической работой, потому что СЛОВО ДАНО ВСЕМ! Даром слова обладает вообще очень много людей. Если вы работаете словом — вы врач, психолог, учитель, преподаватель — вы 100% маг слова, и что-то мне подсказывает, знаете об этом. Магия слова

🔥153

24 Jun 2026, 18:53 UTC508 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Хочу вам безумную красоту показать! Это фотографии очень дорогого для нашей семьи человека — Дашиного тренера по конному спорту Галины Волковой. Публикую с ее согласия, конечно же. Галина потрясающий фотограф. В ее объективе обычно лошади и природа. И люди на лошадях. Это наши родные, псковские — павские поля. Павы — деревня в Псковской области под Порховом, всего 3 часа на машине и там вот это буйство цвета. Эти

16

23 Jun 2026, 09:56 UTC135 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Хочу поделиться с вами отзывами. Кроме того, что это все действительно невероятно приятно (и особенно знать, что растет молодое поколение людей силы), снова хочется обратить ваше внимание, что свечи с маркетплейсов могут быть очень низкого качества. Было время, когда я тоже думала: ну какая разница, свеча и свеча, пишут же воск — значит воск. И только начав сама работать со свечами, стала понимать, что разница може

9🔥3

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @vosk_ezoschool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Школа Воска Академии Пробужденной Силы” (@vosk_ezoschool), 340 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vosk_ezoschool.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.