Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for VORONIN TV

Channel

VORONIN TV

@voronintv1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

361subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001775219228
TypeChannel
Username@voronintv1
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 September 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/voronintv1

Growth

36111 Sept 2026, 06:22 — 361 subscribers12 Sept 2026, 10:38 — 361 subscribers11 Sept 2026, 06:2212 Sept 2026, 10:38
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 360–362 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 10:38361no change
11 Sept 2026, 06:22361first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 29 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
60.7%
avg views ÷ 361 subscribers
Avg views / post
219
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 5 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026
Posts held5 (29 August 202610 September 2026)
Views total1,096
Reactions total63
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Sept 2026, 06:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
45s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

63 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3555.6%
1422.2%
👍1117.5%
👏11.59%
💘11.59%
🥰11.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 29 August 2026 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Sept 2026, 07:01 UTC105 views14 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Что генерят зрелые мужчины с помощью нейронок Вот так, по мнению ИИ, выглядели бы наши поезда из LEGO. Особенно интересными, на мой взгляд, вышли электрички. 🤔 Понятно, что в основном это рандомная генерация, и многих деталей тупо не существует. Но местами нейронки выдают годные идеи, которые могут послужить основой для новых техник строительства. Что думаете?

🔥85🥰1

Signed Артём

7 Sept 2026, 07:01 UTC169 views18 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

Как похорошели LEGO-самолеты за последнее время! Энтузиаст под псевдонимом BigPlanes буквально реформировал LEGO-авиастроение. 🔥 Его реплики самолетов отличаются реалистичными геометрией фюзеляжа и стреловидностью, моторизованной механизацией и убирающимися шасси, а также рабочим освещением. Вот его лучшие, по моему мнению, работы: – Boeing VC-25 Air Force One. – Boeing 777-300ER British Airways. – DC-10 America

🔥144

Signed Артём

6 Sept 2026, 13:26 UTC190 views7 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Video

О, как! 😳Оказывается, не один я так считаю, но и автор топового канала на 2 млн подписчиков. Интересно, сколько ещё должно пройти времени, чтобы эта точка зрения стала мейнстримом?🤔 А Rozetked – огромные молодцы! Лучший канал с обзорами техники и гаджетов на просторах СНГ. 🔥 Сам смотрю уже несколько лет и вам рекомендую. 👍

5👍2

Signed Артём

3 Sept 2026, 13:47 UTC280 views10 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

На днях стартовал новый учебный год, а значит, пришло время просвещать свою аудиторию. Подготовил для вас небольшой ролик с разбором самых популярных комментариев на моих ресурсах. Предлагаю вам переосмыслить то, о чем вы мне постоянно пишете. Это сделает вас куда более зрелыми и интеллектуальными молодыми людьми. https://youtu.be/4SSEeakG5dg?si=yn6eVuMmL1OpJOgq

👍8👏1💘1

Signed Артём

29 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC352 views14 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Photo

КамАЗ-43118 Дом на колесах возвращается! Пока я готовлю ролик с разбором самых популярных комментариев, предлагаю вам вспомнить об одном своем автомобильном проекте. В феврале 2024 года я начал строить вездеходный дом на колёсах на базе автомобиля КамАЗ-43118. Вдохновение как-то быстро сошло на нет, и начатое шасси пылилось на полке более двух лет. Но поскольку недавно я решил отдохнуть от поездов, я вспомнил об это

🔥13👍1

Signed Артём

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @voronintv1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Вакансии в Мытищах
@rabota_mytishchy · 27,265
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“VORONIN TV” (@voronintv1), 361 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/voronintv1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.