Channel
@vornshades
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
81subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002755494528 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vornshades |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 10 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vornshades |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:09 | 81 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 81 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
59 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤓 | 26 | 44.1% | |
| 🌚 | 14 | 23.7% | |
| 😘 | 5 | 8.47% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 5.08% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 5.08% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 5.08% | |
| custom 5251676977785483690 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| custom 5253463362058070742 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| custom 5283139309740765379 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| custom 5307845791283425776 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.69% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2025 to 22 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hi, Vorns. Take @Liibra 1.6jt @Chhart 800k @Ccheer 1jt @Dilddo 1jt @Ssordid 1.2jt @Buntall 800k @Menttari 800k @Fronttal 1.4jt @Ssince 800k @Indaah 1.4jt @Mostlly 1jt @Deiity 1.4jt aja yuk, all already fragment, ya, kinda inrush juga.
🤓26🌚9🤯3😁3😘1custom 52516769777854836901custom 52534633620580707421custom 52831393097407653791
Sticker, posted without a caption
Hi, take @ohsionp & @ohsiong di 150k aja, yuk. Bundling only, ya. Hit @snuffersbot / @abudantt kalau interest, thank you.
😘1
Sticker, posted without a caption
😘1
Help forward this message, Vorns! For the feedback bisa contact @Snuffersbot aja, ya. Thank you.
😘1
UP FOR SALE USERNAME BY @VORNSHADES. Fragment. @Liibra 1.9jt @Chhart 1.1jt @Ccheer 1.3jt @Dilddo 1.3jt @Ssordid 1.5jt @Buntall 1.1jt @Menttari 1.1jt @Fronttal 1.7jt @Ssince 1.1jt @Indaah 1.7jt @Mostlly 1.3jt @Deiity 1.7jt Non-Fragment. @Reggional 130k @Sponttan 95k @OhSionG 90k @OhSionP 80k @uGagak 70k @Masturbrasi 13k @Masturbasji 13k @Masturbasmi 13k @Mascturbasi 13k @Mastkurbasi 13k @Mastmurbasi 13k @Mastufrbasi…
😘1
Sticker, posted without a caption
🌚1
Hallo, sender. Buat ssordid nya avail cicil santai, ya. But paling lama 1 bulan.
🌚2
Sticker, posted without a caption
🌚1
Hallo, sender. Untuk ssordid nya up for sale, ya. Bisa reach out bot @snuffersbot atau ke roomchat gua aja buat detail price nya.
🌚1
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ (’&.) GLOOMWRAITH: Invented Compound. A spirit born from despair and gloom, shadowy. Within these timeworn halls, lit dimly by memory and flame, a new figure steps into the quiet. That figure is @Mostlly, and the shadows already seem to know your name. Welcome, strange soul make yourself at home. 2037: EXSANGUINE ./ THE DREAM-ROT. Cursed in the name of @Vornshades. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vornshades. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,096,045 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@vornshades named 8 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VORNSHADE’S .. / BLOOD KNOWETH.” (@vornshades), 81 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vornshades.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.