Channel
@vologdapoisk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,320subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001302989593 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vologdapoisk |
| Description | 🔎Вологда-поиск. Заявление РКН № 6128055561 |
| Created | 11 July 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vologdapoisk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 8,320 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 8,322 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 8,326 | first reading |
105 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 57 of 105 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 105 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 23,439 |
| Reactions total | 104 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
83 reactions across 47 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 26 | 31.3% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 28.9% | |
| custom 5219886961300377283 | 17 | 20.5% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 15.7% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 3.61% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 105 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Заявления дня: сказано на всю страну Собираем наиболее резонансные публичные заявления и предложения наших депутатов, политиков, известных персон и «лидеров общественного мнения». https://vologda-poisk.ru/news/obschestvo/zayavleniya-dnya-skazano-na-vsyu-stranu-259
«Рэп на Руси» 15 августа рэперы МК5.45 и Роман Жиган выступят в Кириллове на музыкальном фестивале «Рэп на Руси». Организаторы обещают, что на концерте мощная энергия хип‑хопа встретится с духом Русского Севера. Выступление артистов завершит празднование 250-летия Кириллова.
Спор из-за бургеров Роскачество поспорило с Роспотребнадзором из-за бургеров с кишечной палочкой. Ранее были опубликованы результаты исследования бургеров 20 торговых сетей, в пяти из них нашли кишечную палочку. Роспотребнадзор отказался привлекать продавцов фастфуда к ответственности из-за неправильного оформления документов при покупке образцов. Роскачество с этими претензиями не согласилось. При этом сами про…
«Индексировать зарплату надо всем – и полноценно!» Такой законопроект внесён сегодня в Госдуму депутатами фракции «Справедливая Россия». Он предусматривает поправки в Трудовой кодекс РФ https://vologda-poisk.ru/news/zakon/indeksirovat-zarplatu-nado-vsem-i-polnotsenno
👏1
МВД предупреждает: «топливные аферисты» не унимаются https://vologda-poisk.ru/news/kriminal/mvd-preduprezhdaet-toplivnye-aferisty-ne-unimayutsya
🔥1
Каждый одиннадцатый работающий житель Вологды опасается потерять профессиональные навыки на нынешнем месте работы. При этом почти половина опрошенных, наоборот, видит возможности для дальнейшего развития. Такие результаты показало исследование SuperJob. О снижении своей квалификации рассказали 9% участников опроса. Еще 44% считают, что благодаря нынешней работе продолжают приобретать опыт и расти как специалисты. Дл…
Вологжанам напомнили о сроках поверки водосчетчиков. Если вовремя не проверить прибор, его данные перестанут использоваться при расчете платы за воду. Об этом сообщили в Северной сбытовой компании. Когда именно нужно провести следующую поверку, указано в единой квитанции в разделе «Индивидуальные приборы учета». В зависимости от модели проверять водосчетчик требуется через четыре-шесть лет. Контролировать дату повер…
С 1 сентября управляющим компаниям, ТСЖ и жилищным кооперативам придется завести официальные каналы для общения с жильцами в мессенджере «Макс». То же самое касается ресурсоснабжающих организаций. Об этом РИА Новости рассказал эксперт в сфере ЖКХ Дмитрий Бондарь. Через новый канал жители смогут получать информацию о работе организации, ее контактах и времени приема. Там же будут публиковать сообщения об авариях и от…
В администрации Череповца со ссылкой на Росгидромет опубликовали «характеристику» июльского воздуха в городе металлургов. Оценка конкретная: сразу по трем загрязняющим веществам превышена предельно допустимая концентрация. Да горожане, похоже, и не удивлены. Наиболее проблемным, как и ранее, оказался сероводород — его максимальная концентрация достигала 2,3 ПДК. подробнее: https://vologda-poisk.ru/news/na-zlobu-dn…
В ближайшие дни ненастье будет только усиливаться – и все из-за циклона. Сегодня дождливая погода охватила огромные территории: от арктического побережья до Черноземья. Самые мощные ливни обещают востоку Поморья и Верхней Волге. Местами выльется за сутки 10–20 мм осадков — это норма за неделю. В Вологде сейчас +15°. С 13 августа похолодание начнет нарастать. В четверг, пятницу и субботу температура выше +10° не подн…
«На больничном с ребёнком? Деньги будут!» В правительство для получения отзыва поступил очередной законопроект «социальной направленности» https://vologda-poisk.ru/news/ekonomika/na-bolnichnom-s-rebyonkom-dengi-budut
👍1
На помощь соотечественникам за рубежом смогут направлять больше средств Проект такого постановления правительства разработали в МИД России: документ вынесен на общественное обсуждение, до 26 августа https://vologda-poisk.ru/news/zakon/na-pomosch-sootechestvennikam-za-rubezhom-smogut-napravlyat-bolshe-sredstv
Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @vologdapoisk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 203,817 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вологда-поиск” (@vologdapoisk), 8,320 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vologdapoisk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.