🎶 Лови Волну – инвестиции в музыку
Первая краудлендинговая платформа под надзором ЦБ РФ.
🌊 volnu.ru
✅ Инвестируй в треки артистов
✅ Зарабатывай на музыке
✅ Прозрачно и онлайн
⚠️ Инвестиции связаны с рисками.
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 129–131 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 01:16
130
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:01
130
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
65.1%
avg views ÷ 130 subscribers
Avg views / post
84.7
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
20 (7 April 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
254
Reactions total
19
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
70
Videos
8
Links
10
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
7m 28s
Average length
1m 04s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
165 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
53
32.1%
❤
40
24.2%
👍
31
18.8%
💯
8
4.85%
😍
6
3.64%
❤🔥
5
3.03%
🎉
4
2.42%
👏
4
2.42%
🤔
4
2.42%
🤩
3
1.82%
🏆
2
1.21%
👌
2
1.21%
🤝
2
1.21%
😱
1
0.606%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 165reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @volnu. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 April 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я - артист, как мне разместить свой трек на платформе?
Артист может обратиться к лейблу VS Music. После оценки коммерческого потенциала, лейбл может опубликовать на платформе соответствующее инвестиционное предложение.
Ориентиром для оценки потенциала могут служить аудитория от 200 тысяч слушателей в месяц на Яндекс Музыке, скорость прироста активной аудитории и другие показатели.
(Инвестиции связаны с риском. Не …
Инвесторы не платят комиссию за использование платформы — все предусмотренные правилами комиссии оплачивает заёмщик, то есть лейбл, привлекающий финансирование.
Например, если инвестор пополнил баланс на 2 000 ₽ и решил вывести эту сумму обратно на свой расчётный счёт, он получит все 2 000 ₽ без каких-либо удержаний со стороны платформы.
(Инвестиции связаны с риском. Не является индивидуальной инвестиционной рекоме…
Как работает финансирование через займы на платформе?
Заемщиком выступает музыкальный лейбл.
Инвестор предоставляет лейблу заем и получает право на возврат вложенной суммы и выплату процентов в соответствии с условиями договора-оферты.
Права на музыкальное произведение сохраняются у лейбла. Лейбл получает роялти, рассчитывает выплаты инвесторам и предоставляет отчетность.
Размер выплаты определяется по формуле:
S …
Отличия акцепта инвестиционного предложения от заключения договора инвестирования.
На платформе volnu.ru инвесторы выбирают лоты, формируя «корзину». Следующий этап — подписание документов. Это и есть акцепт оферты — момент, когда инвестор соглашается с условиями, на которых лицо, привлекающее инвестиции, предлагает заключить договор инвестирования.
После подписания акцепта в личном кабинете инвестора соответствующ…
Что такое инвестиционный раунд?
Раунд — это период действия инвестиционного предложения. В оферте лейбл заранее указывает:
— максимальный срок сбора;
— минимальную сумму для успешного завершения раунда;
— максимальную сумму раунда.
Если максимум собран досрочно, раунд закрывается раньше срока.
Договор считается заключённым с момента поступления средств на счёт заёмщика. Именно с этой даты начинается начисление дох…
Сколько времени занимает верификация?
Обычно проверка данных занимает 15–20 минут. После успешного прохождения верификации вам придёт СМС-уведомление с дальнейшими инструкциями.
Затем останется только проверить и подписать заявление о присоединении к Правилам инвестиционной платформы «Лови волну» — и можно начинать пользоваться всеми возможностями платформы.
(Инвестиции связаны с риском.Не является индивидуальной …
Отвечаем на частый вопрос:
Вложенная сумма в любом случае гарантировано вернется инвестору?
Инвестирование устроено так: вы вкладываете средства по договору займа, займ подлежит возврату в любом случае в период действия договора. От прослушиваний трека зависит размер ежеквартальных выплат до окончания действия договора.
📊 Прозрачность и отчётность:
— один раз в квартал предоставляется отчёт о прослушиваниях на осно…
Василий Подъянов и Смбат Элмасян стали гостями нового выпуска подкаста Анара Бабаева «На пенсию в 35 лет!» 🎙️
Поговорили о том, как сегодня устроен музыкальный бизнес, что на самом деле влияет на успех артиста и какие изменения ждут индустрию в ближайшие годы. Отдельно обсудили работу лейбла VS Music, платформу «Лови Волну» и инвестиции в музыку как новый класс альтернативных инвестиций.
Выпуск уже доступен на YouT…
За проектом «Лови волну» стоит музыкальный лейбл VS music. Мы уже более 6 лет работаем в индустрии, занимаемся продюсированием артистов, дистрибуцией и управлением музыкальными правами.
Сегодня мы хотим рассказать как можно большему количеству людей, что инвестиции в музыку существуют и что музыка может быть не только объектом потребления, но и отдельным классом альтернативных инвестиций📈
«Идентичность» — фестиваль авторов в Перми, который объединяет представителей креативных индустрий: предпринимателей, музыкантов, артистов, дизайнеров и людей, формирующих культурную среду города.
Василий Подъянов и Смбат Элмасян выступили на мероприятии в качестве спикеров, где рассказали про подход VS music к работе с артистами, устройство музыкального лейбла изнутри и про платформу инвестиций в музыку «Лови Волну…
🔥4😍3👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @volnu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 959,590 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЛОВИ ВОЛНУ” (@volnu), 130 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/volnu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.