прошло много времени... и кажется, скоро будет ребрендинг?

Channel
༘⋆𝕍𝕆𝕀𝔻📼˚ ༘ ೀ⋆。
@voidosd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
9subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003512914003 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @voidosd |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 12 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/voidosd |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 9 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 9 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
23 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 30.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 17.4% | |
| 🍓 | 4 | 17.4% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 13.0% | |
| custom 5246975401640627774 | 2 | 8.70% | |
| custom 5305590001445141565 | 1 | 4.35% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 4.35% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 4.35% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 January 2026 to 21 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @voidosd. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 January 2026 to 21 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🐍 | — всех girlies поздравляю с нашим праздником!
❤1🍓1
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ ❤️❤️❤️ ❤️❤️❤️ нᴀᴩи ʙᴇщᴀᴇᴛ... 🐱 | — Дорогая, любимая, и просто конфетка наша Мэй! Поздравляю тебя с Днём рождения! Желаю самого крепкого здоровья, успехов во всём, радостных дней побольше и всего самого наилучшего! Мы тебя очень все ценим и любим💋 ʙᴇнди ʙᴇщᴀᴇᴛ... 🐍 | — МЭЭЭЭЭЙ, ты наша дива, тру Юна, тру Макс, тру Малинин, тру Мэйби, тру доза/роза вообще... yaaaay, I love you so much, ты прекрасная и чу…
❤1❤🔥1🍓1🔥1
🌟ꓒꓤOꓞIꓶƎ 🌱 🔤🔤🔤🔤 ─── ⋆⋅☆⋅⋆ ───── ⋆⋅☆⋅⋆ ───── 🌟ꓕHƎ ꓭƎSꓕ WⱯ⅄ ꓕO OꓥƎꓤꓛOWƎ ꓞƎⱯꓤ IS ꓕO ꓞⱯꓛƎ Iꓕ HƎⱯꓷ-ON 🌟𝕤𝕥𝕣𝕒𝕟𝕘𝕖𝕣 𝕥𝕙𝕚𝕟𝕘𝕤 🧇🧇🧇 🔤🔤🔤🔤ᴀʀɪ 🧇🧇 1 5 ʏ.ᴏ / ɪɴꜰᴊ 🧇🧇 🤩 ʏᴏᴜʀ ʟɪꜰᴇ ʙᴜʀɴs ꜰᴀsᴛᴇʀ ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ➤ 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙩𝙤𝙩𝙮𝙥𝙚 😚 WONHƎƎ TGC : 🧇🧇🧇 SOLO #PROFILE #NARI
новая участница?
Channel photo updated
но это не просто переоформление профайлов, как вам могло показаться, ибо у нас для вас есть ещё несколько новостей.
🌟ꓒꓤOꓞIꓶƎ 🌱 🔤🔤🔤🔤 ─── ⋆⋅☆⋅⋆ ───── ⋆⋅☆⋅⋆ ───── 🌟ꓶƎⱯꓥƎ WƎ ⱯꓶONƎ 🌟𝕤𝕥𝕣𝕒𝕟𝕘𝕖𝕣 𝕥𝕙𝕚𝕟𝕘𝕤 🧇🧇🧇 🔤🔤🔤 🔤ᴇɴᴅʏ 🧇🧇 1 5 ʏ.ᴏ / ɪɴꜰᴘ 🧇🧇 😱ɪ'ᴍ ᴀɴ ᴀɴɢᴇʟ, ɪ'ᴍ ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴠɪʟ, ᴀɴᴅ ɪ'ᴍ ᴄᴏᴍɪɴɢ ɪɴsɪᴅᴇ ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ➤ 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙩𝙤𝙩𝙮𝙥𝙚 😚 IꓤOHⱯ TGС : 🧇🧇🧇 SOLO (?) #PROFILE #WENDY
🌟ꓒꓤOꓞIꓶƎ 🌱 🔤🔤🔤🔤 ─── ⋆⋅☆⋅⋆ ───── ⋆⋅☆⋅⋆ ───── 🌟I ꓛⱯN SꓵꓤꓥIꓥƎ ⱯꓨⱯIN 🌟𝕤𝕥𝕣𝕒𝕟𝕘𝕖𝕣 𝕥𝕙𝕚𝕟𝕘𝕤 🧇🧇🧇 🔤🔤🔤 🔤ᴀʏ 🧇🧇 1 6 ʏ.ᴏ / ᴇɴꜰᴘ 🧇🧇 🌟ᴛʜᴇʀᴇ ɪs ᴛʜᴜɴᴅᴇʀ ɪɴ ᴏᴜʀ ʜᴇᴀʀᴛs ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ➤ 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙩𝙤𝙩𝙮𝙥𝙚 😚 ⅄ꓵNⱯH TGC : 🧇🧇🧇 SOLO #PROFILE #MAY
🌟ꓒꓤOꓞIꓶƎ 🌱 🔤🔤🔤🔤 ─── ⋆⋅☆⋅⋆ ───── ⋆⋅☆⋅⋆ ───── 🌟ꓞꓤIƎNꓷS ꓷON'ꓕ ꓶIƎ 🌟𝕤𝕥𝕣𝕒𝕟𝕘𝕖𝕣 𝕥𝕙𝕚𝕟𝕘𝕤 🧇🧇🧇 🔤🔤🔤 🔤ɪɴ ʟᴜɴ 🧇🧇 1 4 ʏ.ᴏ / ɪsᴛᴊ 🧇🧇 🌟ɪ ᴄʜᴇʀɪsʜ ᴛʜᴇ ᴍᴏᴍᴇɴᴛs ᴡɪᴛʜ ʏᴏᴜ ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ➤ 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙩𝙤𝙩𝙮𝙥𝙚 😚 WINſꓵ TGC : 🧇🧇🧇 SOLO (?) #PROFILE #LINLUN
❤1❤🔥1🔥1
🌟ꓒꓤOꓞIꓶƎ 🌱 🔤🔤🔤🔤 ─── ⋆⋅☆⋅⋆ ───── ⋆⋅☆⋅⋆ ───── 🌟ꓭꓶⱯNꓘ WⱯꓘƎS ⅄Oꓵ ꓛꓤⱯZ⅄ 🌟𝕤𝕥𝕣𝕒𝕟𝕘𝕖𝕣 𝕥𝕙𝕚𝕟𝕘𝕤 🧇🧇🧇 🔤🔤🔤🔤ʟᴇɴᴀ 🧇🧇 19 ʏ.ᴏ / ᴇsꜰᴊ 🧇🧇 🌟ɪ'ʟʟ ʙᴇ ʜᴇʀᴇ ᴛɪʟʟ ᴛʜᴇ ᴇɴᴅ ᴏꜰ ᴛɪᴍᴇ ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ➤ 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙩𝙤𝙩𝙮𝙥𝙚 😚 WOꓘⱯ TGC : 🧇🧇🧇 SOLO #PROFILE #ELENA
❤1❤🔥1🔥1
The Upside Down is open again. Don't be afraid - the VOID will swallow you up quickly...
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @voidosd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 769,623 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@voidosd named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“༘⋆𝕍𝕆𝕀𝔻📼˚ ༘ ೀ⋆。” (@voidosd), 9 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/voidosd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.