Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

void krueger

@voidkrueger

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

41subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003389903583
TypeChannel
Username@voidkrueger
Descriptionhttps://soundcloud.com/void_krueger dm - @silenthillth
Created15 March 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/voidkrueger

Growth

4110 Aug 2026, 06:31 — 41 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 18:31 — 41 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 06:3110 Aug 2026, 18:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40–42 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 18:3141no change
10 Aug 2026, 06:3141first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 15 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
10
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

145 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54316773305839929294229.0%
custom 53144526750503588663826.2%
custom 54316723870766363673423.4%
custom 52107160335973267981812.4%
custom 521087314779597870296.21%
custom 527632686883905539121.38%
custom 547450159049895269221.38%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 March 2026 to 28 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @voidkrueger. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 March 2026 to 28 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Jun 2026, 23:05 UTC72 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

дроп через год, в армии не будет майка

custom 53144526750503588668

25 Jun 2026, 21:00 UTC101 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#KRUEGERSEASON FEATURING mainfranzz, dragonz!pbag, sqwipper PROD. BY FRETTYPOOL, plug2dope, sqwoxy, woodsay, rayx, @jakethedawg, @sainbeatz, DARKTHEPRODUCER, quas, cxldie, lilc1009lil, WATASHIWASHAWTY, TRIPPILL, mephrill, ganbate, zestymain, aftersunrising256, helmikuuta, glorykeyz COVER BY Void Krueger ONLY SOUNDCLOUD

custom 54316773305839929297custom 52107160335973267981custom 53144526750503588661

23 Jun 2026, 08:14 UTC82 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54316773305839929298custom 53144526750503588661

15 Jun 2026, 10:47 UTC100 views8 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52107160335973267985custom 53144526750503588662custom 52108731477959787021

11 Jun 2026, 21:00 UTC109 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

В кровь featuring MFEED prod. by @sainbeatz cover by Void Krueger only soundcloud

custom 52108731477959787026custom 52107160335973267981custom 54316773305839929291

11 Jun 2026, 07:08 UTC85 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 53144526750503588669

4 Jun 2026, 07:41 UTC123 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

фит с мфидом? да, будет!

custom 543167238707663636710custom 52108731477959787022

1 Jun 2026, 06:28 UTC125 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

YBLUDOK

custom 54316773305839929298custom 52107160335973267982custom 53144526750503588662custom 52763268688390553911

1 Jun 2026, 05:26 UTC94 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

MIXTAPE FROM RUSSIA

custom 52107160335973267987custom 54316773305839929291

31 May 2026, 09:25 UTC101 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 54316773305839929296custom 52107160335973267982

28 May 2026, 18:04 UTC91 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54316723870766363677custom 54316773305839929293custom 53144526750503588662custom 52763268688390553911

25 May 2026, 14:00 UTC102 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54316723870766363675custom 53144526750503588662

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @voidkrueger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 791,319 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“void krueger” (@voidkrueger), 41 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/voidkrueger.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.