Channel
@voiceless
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
228subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002232535121 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @voiceless |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/voiceless |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 228 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 228 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (5 June 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 27 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
24 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 37.5% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 20.8% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 16.7% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @voiceless. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 June 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
BREAKING: Telegram founder Pavel Durov charged with “facilitating terrorism” Telegram founder & CEO Pavel Durov has reportedly been charged with allegedly “facilitating terrorist activities,” with an international arrest warrant issued for him. Authorities accuse Telegram of failing to remove channels and chats allegedly used by Ukrainian intelligence to coordinate attacks. This marks another major escalation in t…
🏆 Contest for Artists: Results 😌 Our first artist contest of this scale drew hundreds of creative minds. 🤝 The review phase was intense and lengthy. We went through every submission with care and were thrilled by how many outstanding entries we found. 📬 Some artists have also been approached directly to explore further cooperation opportunities – in addition to their share of the prize fund. Meet the winners! Fu…
🚀 Bring Live TON Meme Coin Prices to Your Telegram Channel! Looking for an easy way to keep your community updated with the hottest TON meme coins? 🤖 @memepricesbot displays real-time TON meme coin prices directly inside your Telegram channel. ✅ Live price updates ✅ Supports the top GRAM meme coins ✅ Instant access with a single command ✅ No setup required ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 📌 How to use 1. Add @memepricesbot to your Teleg…
❤1
📈 Never miss the next Telegram meme move. 🤑Track every major GRAM meme in one place with live price channels. $UTYA → @utyaprices $REDO → @redo_prices $SCAT → @scat_prices $YODA → @yodaprices $CHERRY → @cherryprices ⚡Be early. React faster. Stay ahead of everyone else. 📁Add all price channels in one tap [Link]
A new chapter begins for the Telegram ecosystem. Today, TON officially returns to its original identity: Gram (GRAM). What started as Telegram's original vision in 2018 has come full circle. After years of growth, resilience, and adoption, the ecosystem is embracing the name that started it all. This isn't a token migration or a technical overhaul. The network remains the same. The mission remains the same. The com…
❤1👍1🔥1
Kissed Frogs Explodes 737%, Climbs Into Getgems Top 5 🐸 Kissed Frogs is quickly becoming one of the hottest collections on TON. After a massive 737% surge in floor price over the last 24 hours, the collection has climbed into Getgems’ Top 5 rankings. While Telegram Usernames and Anonymous Numbers continue to lead the charts, Kissed Frogs is now firmly in the spotlight. The question is: is this just hype, or the st…
🤗1😍1
😀An Instagram user has claimed that their rare username, @kv, was stolen through a Meta AI-related exploit, even though two-factor authentication was enabled on the account. According to the user, the attacker was able to bypass security protections and transfer the username to another account. Screenshots shared online show Meta Support acknowledging the issue and stating that the case would be escalated to a speci…
❤1😭1
⚠️ New Telegram Scam Alert: Fake Fragment Mini App A new scam targeting Telegram and TON users is spreading through fake Fragment offers. The attacker pretends to be interested in buying your Telegram username and sends what appears to be a legitimate Fragment link. After gaining your trust, they redirect you to a fake Fragment Mini App that looks nearly identical to the real one. You connect your wallet, click “A…
❤1😭1
Chat, we are getting there.
🤣1
Less than 24 hours remain until the TON → GRAM governance vote concludes. Current results: ⚪️ 79% voted for $GRAM ⚪️ 20% voted for $TON This vote only affects the ticker/name. The blockchain remains TON 🫡. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Boost the channel!
❤1🔥1
Durov-Themed TON Domain Listed for $1.7 Million The TON DNS domain name “durov.gram” has been listed for sale on GetGems with an asking price of $1.7 million, highlighting continued interest in premium TON ecosystem assets. 🤑 High-value TON DNS sales are nothing new. Previous auctions saw domains such as “wallet.ton” and “casino.ton” sell for between $200,000 and $260,000, while the @news Telegram username reported…
❤1
TON Memecoins Could Outperform Solana’s Biggest Winners Some investors think that if TON eventually grows larger than Solana in terms of adoption, its top memecoin could end up reaching valuations that make today’s biggest Solana winners look small by comparison. The idea isn’t complicated. TON has a major advantage through Telegram’s enormous global audience, along with strong community support, tight platform int…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @voiceless. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vᴏɪᴄᴇʟᴇss” (@voiceless), 228 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/voiceless.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.