Channel
@voice_nnov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
420subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001225015724 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @voice_nnov |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/voice_nnov |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 420 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:50 | 420 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 5 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
68 reactions across 9 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 14 | 20.6% | |
| 🤡 | 9 | 13.2% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 11.8% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 11.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 8.82% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 5.88% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 5.88% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 5.88% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 5.88% | |
| 🤬 | 4 | 5.88% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 2.94% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2026 to 6 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
РИЛСЫ ПОД КЛЮЧ запустили услугу, где мы напишем сценарии, придумаем формат ℹ️ вам только быть в кадре сценарии, воронка, идеи, съемка и монтаж на нас Если вам сейчас нужна съемка и продвижение, напишите @nastya_voicee только для тех, кто готов
Зачем регистрировать бренд Подкаст с юристом Мариной Стрежневой. Как защитить свой бренд и не получить штраф до 5 миллионов? 😳 Простыми словами говорим о товарных знаках, регистрации бренда, защите курсов, личного бренда и интеллектуальной собственности. — Нужно ли регистрировать имя эксперта? — Что делать, если название уже занято? — Правда ли это дорого? — И почему предпринимателям стоит задуматься об этом уже н…
❤2👍1🔥1🤩1😍1
Осталось 3 места на реалии по личному бренду 🙌🏻 Писать @nastya_voicee
РЕАЛИТИ-ШОУ ПО АКТИВАЦИИ ЛИЧНОГО БРЕНДА Онлайн формат, где ты за 21 дней собираешь свой бренд в живую: — формулируешь позиционирование, которое запоминается — находишь свою тему, которую хочется покупать — упаковываешь соцсети так, чтобы они начали продавать — и самое главное — выходишь в публичность без ощущения “я не такая / мне рано” 🔗 В шоу ты не наблюдаешь — ты делаешь. И каждое задание — это шаг к узнаваемо…
❤2😍2🔥1🤣1
30-31 мая REELS DAY для экспертов и предпринимателей, кто хочет снять продающие ролики без стресса От нас: — анализ ниши — создание сценариев — запись 3-4х рилс по вашей нише — смонтированный материал и исходники 🎫 5 экспертов. Запись на съемки @nastya_voicee
Медиа, блогинг, личный бренд — нефть 2026 года и если вы еще не там, то продвижение бизнеса будет гораздо дороже 🌚 16 мая | 11:00 Оффлайн-практикум «Активация бренда» для тех предпринимателей и экспертов, кто хочет увеличить узнаваемость и укрепить продажи в бизнесе. ➡️ позиционирование и позиция — что мне делать, чтобы быть заметным и услышанным ➡️ стратегия создания бренда — создаем пошаговый план, разбираем каж…
💯3🔥2❤🔥1
Video message, posted without a caption
👍3❤🔥2🔥1
Упаковка группы ВК✅ Многие сейчас перешли на новую площадку, готовы помочь быстро упаковать ваш проект! ➡️ @nastya_voicee
👍3🔥3❤🔥1🤡1
28 апреля горит место на подкаст со скидкой. В 14:30 Напишите мне @nastya_voicee в лс, цена вас порадует
Бизнес-завтрак «Юридические риски для онлайн-бизнеса: как не потерять миллион» 31 марта | 10:00-12:00 — встреча для тех, кто хочет понять новую реальность законодательного регулирования онлайн-продаж. Разберем, как выстроить надежную правовую защиту своей деятельности. — сбор персональных данных и маркировка рекламы — лицензия на образовательную деятельность: кому она точно нужна — какие необходимы документы для …
Отзывы от участников наших встреч всегда согревают и мотивируют💖 Лаборатория — это постепенное создание бренда вдолгую. Не рывками, а по кирпичику, чтобы он системно приносил результаты.
🔥4🤡4❤3🤣2💯1🤩1🤬1
Бизнес-завтрак «Юридические риски для онлайн-бизнеса: как не потерять миллион» 31 марта | 10:00-12:00 — встреча для тех, кто хочет понять новую реальность законодательного регулирования онлайн-продаж. Разберем, как выстроить надежную правовую защиту своей деятельности. — сбор персональных данных и маркировка рекламы — лицензия на образовательную деятельность: кому она точно нужна — какие необходимы документы для …
🙏2⚡1❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @voice_nnov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 743,660 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@voice_nnov named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Стрелка — комьюнити экспертов и предпринимателей | Нижний Новгород” (@voice_nnov), 420 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/voice_nnov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.