Channel
@voice_chief
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
90subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002416182127 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @voice_chief |
| Description | Канал диктора/актера озвучания — Никиты Анисимова. Посвящен личному опыту, шуткам, событиям, плохим дублям и работе в этой профессии. Отзывы на озвучку: @voicechief_fb Инста: voice_chief Сайт-визитка: VoiceChief.ru Сотрудничество: [email protected] |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/voice_chief |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 90 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 90 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 12 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
147 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 70 | 47.6% | |
| ❤ | 26 | 17.7% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 10.2% | |
| 🤣 | 13 | 8.84% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 3.40% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 2.72% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 2.72% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 1.36% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 1.36% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 1.36% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 1.36% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.68% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.68% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 147reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2025 to 1 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @voice_chief. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 August 2025 to 1 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎙 Пока собирал новую дубляжную демку, понял одну вещь. Большинство людей думают, что демка диктора — это просто: «Привет, меня зовут Вася, вот мой голос». На практике всё немного больнее 😅 В озвучке хорошая демка должна показать не один голос, а диапазон. Ты должен успеть доказать, что можешь актёрски исполнить: — героя, — злодея, — психа, — антагониста, — поорать или поплакать (любую сильную эмоцию), — мультяшного…
🔥5
Есть ощущение, что после этой демо записи меня больше не позовут в рекламу премиум-сегмента 🤔
🤣2❤1
Сделал себе (и вам) нормальный хрономер текста. 🐈⬛ https://войсшеф.рф/ Потому что сколько ни пользовался чужими калькуляторами — они считают как-то… в параллельной вселенной 😡 То хрон странный короче обычного в 2 раза, то цифры вообще не бьются с реальностью на записи. В итоге накидал свою систему, которая считает как есть — без «примерно». Даже цифры! 🤩 Он внутри калькулятора переводит в буквы. (Например если вы…
❤4😍2🤯1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥6🦄2❤1
Наглядно: ДО и ПОСЛЕ. Спасибо, было очень вкусно. Питер. 567₽ за прекрасный ужин в «ПЫШКА», которая работает с 2008 года. Да, я в Питере. Приехал сюда по делам озвучерским на один день. Утром — сложный подъем в 5 утра. Днём — микрофоны, экраны с таймкодами до 17:00. Вечером — пышки и кофе перед поездкой домой. Заряжаюсь так сказать на 4 часа пути. Приятное путешествие, где такси до аэропорта стоит больше билета в…
❤3
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥1
Video message, posted without a caption
🤣7
Ролик с Симбой в Инсте зашёл настолько, что в сумме за 3 ролика — около 5 млн просмотров. Честно, не ожидал такого отклика. Раз людям нравится — решил продолжить. Нашёл ещё один ролик в похожем вайбе, пока не выкладывал. Как думаете, зайдёт?
🔥8❤5😁1
Всех с Новым годом 2026 🎆🍾
🔥10❤2
Не думал, что когда-то скажу это вслух, но… Сегодня я официально стал сексуальным просветителем Империума Человечества 😈 Да-да. Новый ролик FunPay вышел — и там я объясняю, откуда вообще берутся дети во вселенной Warhammer 40,000. Если коротко: там лор, там хаос, там вопросы, которые обычно задают шёпотом, и я, который пытается произнести всё это так, будто это нормальная рабочая среда. И поверьте, такого я ещё не…
🔥4😁2
ЧАСТЬ 2 Продолжение переписки на Авито 🛍 Недавно пересмотрел фильм «Тупой и ещё тупее» — посмеялся. Ответил человеку на Авито равно-тупым сообщением — снова посмеялся. И тут меня осенило: а что если сделать серию выпусков про таких персонажей? Типа созвониться, пообщаться, послушать их «голос для озвучки» — сделать якобы кастинг на их способности по крикам и орам — и собрать из этого угарный контент 😂 Не развод, н…
❤5😁4😢2🤮1
Небольшой пост в ночи о том, как мне иногда пишут по объявлению услуг озвучания вот такие уникальные люди с голосом. пздц.. Голос есть у всех. Даже у таксофона в девяностых был. Озвучка — это не «есть голос». Это голова, уши и годы практики. А «моя озвучка в тему» — в тему чего? Школьного стенда? Или пишут "вакансия актуальна?"... Блять, зайти в описание к объявлению, потрать на это пару секунд своего времени, а? …
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @voice_chief. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,170,345 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Голосовой Шефф” (@voice_chief), 90 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/voice_chief.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.