"Плотные" верха:
- Как это не плотные???(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻13%
- Давай76%
- Уже знаю ответ😎12%
- Напишу интересующую тему в комментариях⬇️0%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤5👍1🥰1

Channel
@vocamokka
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
699subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001527214569 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vocamokka |
| Description | Вокальные изыски, распевки и подсказки |
| First recorded | 28 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vocamokka |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Sept 2026, 15:22 | 699 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 20 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
173 reactions across 6 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 86 | 49.7% | |
| 🔥 | 34 | 19.7% | |
| 😁 | 26 | 15.0% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 6.36% | |
| 😍 | 8 | 4.62% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.73% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 1.16% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 1.16% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.578% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 173 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"Плотные" верха:
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤5👍1🥰1
Думаю, 33-неплохая цифра, чтобы вернуться обратно из нежелания связываться с соц сетями и миром, а то подумаете ещё, что отлетела к апостолу Петру. Тут уже и концерты прошли, и отпуск прошел, и цвет волос сменила и вокальное сообщество на новый уровень серпентария вышло. Вы там как, живы?
❤40🔥18👍5❤🔥2
Когда пытаешься в стиль, а в итоге муж , напевая:"КУРИМ ДУРЬ", говорит, что я-женская версия Молчаливого Боба Доброе утро всем❤️
😁26❤6👏3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤8👍5
Разбираемся с:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Пока я пытаюсь свыкнуться с тем, что погода в Мск делает все, чтобы ты отсюда уехал, шлю вам немножко тепла из поездки и иду у вас спрашивать: Какую тему разбираем? Чуток я в прострации, потому что тем было уже очень немало. Нужна ваша помощь и подсказка из зала💗 Доброе утро всем, кстати☕️
🔥16😍8❤4
Говорят, там в Москве и центральной части РФ снова снег пошел. Жалко, жалко, конечно. Могло бы быть и потеплее, как в Ереване, например. Ладно, если вас утешит, тут регулярно дожди по полдня могут идти. Доброе утро
❤23🐳2
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @vocamokka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
"Плотные" верха:
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Разбираемся с:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 16 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VocaMokka” (@vocamokka), 699 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vocamokka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.