Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 沃是妈妈

Channel

沃是妈妈

@vo_lover

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004380044968
TypeChannel
Username@vo_lover
Created17 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded21 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/vo_lover

Growth

101713.521 August 2026 — 10 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13 subscribers17 September 2026 — 17 subscribers21 August 202617 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 27 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9–18 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 05:2117+4
8 Sept 2026, 09:5813-1
29 Aug 2026, 06:4714+4
22 Aug 2026, 12:5410no change
21 Aug 2026, 05:0010first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 17 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.3%
avg views ÷ 17 subscribers
Avg views / post
6.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
16.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held6 (17 August 202620 August 2026)
Views total6
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken21 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🥰3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 04:14 UTC147 views2 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

▌幽歌萦渊 · 沃雅妮莎 纵鳍梭跃,澄波吟咏 ========== 「…够了,帕拉斯科娃,我知道,这高音对我来说不成问题!谢尼娅…谢尼娅,你的曲子我也已经牢记在心。我不会忘记的,不会…」 ——沃雅妮莎在演出准备室中的自言自语 在久远的至冬,水妖们曾遍居城中,他们有的在舞台上高歌着颂歌,有的在街巷里欢唱着幽默小调,有的则喜欢钻进水里,用恍惚的歌声吸引人们去水边一探究竟,再猛地跃起,在笑声里把好奇者泼一脸水,而后又在岸边人好气又好笑的嚷嚷声里钻回水中,一摆尾巴便消失不见。 …但是,随着时光流转,至冬的舞台与街巷悄然失去了它们的歌者,水底的旋律也随着暗潮,无声地奔涌向了沉默的彼方,人们不安地暗中揣测,或许那水底的幽歌,会就此离他们远去吧… 不过,在某个早晨,人们却发现,沃雅妮莎依旧在科洛列夫茨基剧院登台献唱,就如同往昔的时光不曾褪却,旧日的欢乐一如往常。 几乎没人知道她留下来的理由——也没有人敢去当面提问,除非这个提问者做好了之后再

🥰2

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @vo_lover. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“沃是妈妈” (@vo_lover), 17 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vo_lover.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.