Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Володя ВникAI/ DeepFake/ Дипфейк/ Нейросети/AI production

@vnikAICG

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

178subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001266983923
TypeChannel
Username@vnikAICG
DescriptionСвязь: @vnikaiai Вникай в AI Мы вникаем уже 6 лет. За это время мы развились от парочки «дипфейкеров» до AI/CG продакшна полного цикла с большими, престижными, а иногда и невероятными кейсами.
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/vnikAICG

Growth

1787 Aug 2026, 10:22 — 178 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 13:17 — 178 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 10:228 Aug 2026, 13:17
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 177–179 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 13:17178no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:22178first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 25 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
48
Videos
56
Links
74

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
6m 37s
Average length
1m 06s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

63 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3149.2%
👍1523.8%
🤡812.7%
34.76%
👌23.17%
🤣23.17%
❤‍🔥11.59%
💩11.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2025 to 9 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vnikAICG. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 September 2025 to 9 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Mar 2026, 13:34 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «Володя ВникAI/ DeepFake/ Дипфейк/ Нейросети/AI production»

9 Mar 2026, 13:32 UTC279 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Немного базы от коллег

🔥4🤡3

Signed Volody ВНИК AI Deepfake

9 Mar 2026, 13:32 UTC294 views8 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @alexandershalyapin

Учёный Стивен Талер несколько лет пытался получить авторские права на картинку, которую он сделал через ИИ. Суды один за другим говорили "нет", Верховный суд просто отказался рассматривать дело — и точка. Автор должен быть человеком, а не программой. И это при том, что некоторые ИИ-энтузиасты с серьёзным видом жалуются, что их "промпты" кто-то плагиатит. Ну и вишенка на торте: пока одни требуют прав для ИИ-арта, сам

🤡5🔥3

Signed Volody ВНИК AI Deepfake

7 Mar 2026, 17:48 UTC270 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вообще-то, новости уже больше полугода и очень странный аргумент отказа от идеи. "Непонятно принадлежат ли Диснею кадры с дипфейком или находятся в общественном достоянии как творчество нейросетей". Извините, а Вы точно юрист? А кому принадлежит зловеща-долинная 3д модель того же Дуйэна из "Мумии"? Да и в целом, очень тяжело верится, что индустрия, в которой дипфейки уже давно прижились, все ещё не знает, как юридич

👌2🔥2

Signed Volody ВНИК AI Deepfake

7 Mar 2026, 17:24 UTC226 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Disney планировала использовать технологию AI deepfake, чтобы наложить лицо Дуэйна Джонсона на дублёра тела в игровом ремейке Моана. Джонсон одобрил план, но он не был реализован из-за проблем с данными и авторскими правами. #Moana #Disney >> Читать новость полностью

Signed Volody ВНИК AI Deepfake

19 Feb 2026, 16:01 UTC260 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сегодня премьера... оказывается. В кинотеатрах вышел фильм "Гуантанамера" с Сергеем Шакуровым, над которым мы трудились в качестве Ai-artist по созданию DeepFake lipsync на этапе pre-production&Supervision. Было это уже было 2 года назад, подумать только. Схожу посмотрю, как вышло. Если вы тоже собираетесь - расскажите потом!

🔥3👍2

Signed Volody ВНИК AI Deepfake

15 Feb 2026, 17:01 UTC238 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Идеального момента не существ... Нет, вообще-то правда - не существует. Перфекционизм - настоящее зло, которое убивает рост. Возможно, ты никогда не будешь доволен, тем что делаешь. Совершенно точно всегда будут те, кому не нравится, что ты делаешь. И то и то - это норма. НЕнорма - не делать из-за этого. И вот я делаю. Just do it, так сказать. Вот это вот штуку я делаю примерно четвёртый год. Ну как делаю. "По мазо

🔥3👍2

Signed Volody ВНИК AI Deepfake

15 Feb 2026, 14:24 UTC181 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

тизер тест720.mp4

👍3💩1🔥1

Signed Volody ВНИК AI Deepfake

1 Dec 2025, 10:03 UTC436 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @rhsnewsPhoto

Джеймс Кэмерон назвал захват движений «чистейшей формой актёрского искусства» По его словам, вопреки распространённым заблуждениям, эта технология не заменяет актёров, а усиливает сотрудничество между ними и режиссёром. При этом Кэмерон гораздо осторожнее относится к ИИ, так как его пугает идея создания полностью цифровых актёров. 👍 RHS News — Подписаться

3

Signed Volody ВНИК AI Deepfake

30 Nov 2025, 10:09 UTCviews —

Володя ВникAI/ DeepFake/ Дипфейк/ Нейросети/AI production pinned a video

30 Nov 2025, 10:09 UTC401 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

ЗАМЕНИМ ДАЖЕ ЛАРИСУ ДОЛИНУ. Мы - ВНИКАЙ PRODUCTION делаем DeepFake, ai-анимацию и ai-production полного цикла уже на протяжении 6 лет. За это время мы спасли ни один проект от пересъема из-за мисскаста, отмены актёра или запоротого дубля. НАШИ КЕЙСЫ: - Мастер и Маргарита (2023) - «Иван Васильевич меняет всё» (2024) - Тысяча «нет», одно «да» (2025) - «Ровесник» (2024) И многое другое. НАШИ НАПРАВЛЕНИЯ: - #Дипфейк:

👍2🤣2❤‍🔥1

Signed Volody ВНИК AI Deepfake

24 Nov 2025, 22:17 UTC316 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Всё ещё вникаю. Удивился, какой плотный #шоурил вышел: и элитарный @rich, и один из главных фильмов года (по версии @kinopoisk ), а ещё много анимации! Через месяц у меня маленькая дата — 6 лет. 6 лет, как я спросил у Гугла, что такое #deepfake и с чем их едят. Кажется, что сейчас пойдут какие‑то инфоцыганские самохвальства, мол, «СМАРИТИИИИ, КЕМ Я СТААААЛЬ. СИДЕЛ В ЭТИХ ВАШИХ ТЫРНЕТАХ, А ТЕРЬ Я В ТЕЛЕКЕ!!!». И нет,

🔥6👍2

Signed Volody ВНИК AI Deepfake

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @vnikAICG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Володя ВникAI/ DeepFake/ Дипфейк/ Нейросети/AI production” (@vnikAICG), 178 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vnikAICG.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.