Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

✧ vmutiiny ✧

@vmutiiny

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

783subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001641043908
TypeChannel
Username@vmutiiny
Created3 August 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vmutiiny

Growth

7837 Aug 2026, 03:46 — 783 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 09:12 — 783 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 03:467 Aug 2026, 09:12
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 782–784 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 09:12783no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:46783first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
68.3%
avg views ÷ 783 subscribers
Avg views / post
535
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
21.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held18 (23 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total6,420
Reactions total1,360
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,182 reactions across 18 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 534361946724502645474834.3%
46821.4%
❤‍🔥1868.52%
💘1637.47%
🕊1637.47%
custom 5303037274747859791693.16%
custom 5314789748378708145663.02%
🔥572.61%
🍓472.15%
custom 5971944118606106595442.02%
custom 5879750270480552477371.70%
💋311.42%
custom 5303072025328250593301.37%
custom 5256002645507728473190.871%
custom 5879976769875874914170.779%
custom 5456132436280766274110.504%
🙏100.458%
custom 534378222932567708870.321%
custom 545390035036696983540.183%
custom 541792419246717167330.137%
2 further kinds20.092%

Custom emoji. 12 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,182reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
16
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vmutiiny. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC191 views94 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

мальчишки лакомятся

51🔥19❤‍🔥16custom 53030372747478597913custom 53436194672450264543🕊1custom 54561324362807662741

5 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC237 views74 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ссылка но оно оч долгое.. моя проблема в подобных штуках — мне не хватает терпения и я на полпути начинаю тыкать не разбираясь поэтому немного несогласна с порядком можете делиться в комментах 🧡

custom 53436194672450264543916🕊12💘4custom 54561324362807662743

4 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC254 views66 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mrkmrkrisuePhoto

полноформатник моей работы на палитру💚

🕊34🍓15💋10💘5custom 53030372747478597912

3 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC312 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 534361946724502645422🕊125🙏5🍓2

2 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC427 views81 reactionsread 7 August 2026

наконец-то появился стабильный инет машинист. я откладывала просмотр этого фильма до лучших времен. я слышала пару хороших отзывов о нем, но сама по факту знала только то, что ггшка абсолютный дрыщ, и я могу это использовать в своих целях ^_^ (читать — реф для панталоне). также не хочу сильно спойлерить, хочу описать собственные ощущения раньше я хедила, что это дотторе чуть ли не солевое чудовище выживающее только

❤‍🔥3818custom 534361946724502645416custom 53030372747478597916custom 53147897483787081452custom 53030720253282505931

Signed мякмяк

1 Aug 2026, 11:37 UTC486 views170 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

позже кину пост буквенный

custom 534361946724502645493❤‍🔥3524custom 53030720253282505936💘4custom 53030372747478597913🕊2custom 53147897483787081452

28 Jul 2026, 05:10 UTC759 views162 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«рот был успешно закрыт» веселые катки в морге, где в первую же смену у нас забагались носилки и мы не могли унести труп зандика старушки

🕊75custom 534361946724502645442custom 5314789748378708145258custom 54539003503669698354❤‍🔥3custom 53030720253282505933custom 53030372747478597912

26 Jul 2026, 02:29 UTC727 views179 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

вот бы зандик все-таки притащил ему веточку ирминсуля в кабинетик

custom 53436194672450264548841custom 530303727474785979137🕊4💘3❤‍🔥2custom 53147897483787081452custom 54561324362807662742

23 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC710 views151 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

пока рисую в столик и развлекаюсь надеюсь все хорошо проводят лето ^_^ отбываю дальше думать мысли о паноре…. какой же это сильнейший яой байт это очень хорошо

custom 53436194672450264547042custom 531478974837870814531🙏4custom 53030372747478597913custom 54561324362807662741

21 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC663 views90 reactionsread 7 August 2026

паноре… 🌟

custom 534361946724502645452🕊17custom 597194411860610659514custom 525600264550772847351custom 53030372747478597911

17 Jul 2026, 05:20 UTC838 views114 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

все побежали и я побежала не все котята влезли конечно ссылка можете делиться в комментариях, интересно 🙄

💘59🍓28💋193custom 53436194672450264543custom 53030372747478597912

15 Jul 2026, 05:20 UTC816 views133 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

берите коммишки я буду ответственно тратить все на сисястых женщин 🍙 вспомнила что не показывала ее отдельно

custom 534361946724502645467❤‍🔥27custom 530307202532825059319custom 52560026455077284735custom 54561324362807662744custom 530303727474785979132💘2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @vmutiiny. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 274,714 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“✧ vmutiiny ✧” (@vmutiiny), 783 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vmutiiny.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.