5 measurements spanning 21 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 92–93 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Aug 2026, 16:17
92
-1
23 Aug 2026, 14:44
93
+1
16 Aug 2026, 07:24
92
-1
9 Aug 2026, 13:32
93
no change
8 Aug 2026, 08:31
93
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 26 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
118.8%
avg views ÷ 92 subscribers
Avg views / post
109
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
19 (26 January 2026 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
328
Reactions total
21
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
45s
Average length
45s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
82 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
58
70.7%
🔥
16
19.5%
💯
8
9.76%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 January 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я такой себе эксперт) У меня есть огромный косяк и это синдром самозванца 😔
Я давно в сфере маркетинга, но каждый раз думаю: мне не хватает опыта, сил, связей и конечно же мозгов!
Но ведь мы привыкли ошибаться… сейчас то я понимаю, что смотреть на чужие результаты очень тупо - ведь у каждого свой путь, инструменты и понятное дело цель)
Сейчас я чуть менее болезненно воспринимаю неудачи, честно оцениваю свои навыки…
Пост откровенности ❤️🔥
Все давно в курсе, что я давно работаю в сфере маркетинга и самого блогинга..
Для меня это огромная часть жизни - некий допинг 🙃
Я хотела бы каждый день рассказывать вам о том, что происходит в моей жизни, но распыляться на большое количество площадок я не научилась (а в принципе зачем мне идти против себя?)
Так вот, весной был крутой прорыв и победа над синдромом самозванца - но только я …
Врываюсь сюда со словами благодарности Вам за все знаки внимания и поддержку в мою сторону!❤️
Для меня важно слышать вашу обратную связь касаемо блога, рабочих встреч/созвонов и моих изменений.
Я готова дальше помогать в вашем пути, ну и радовать вас контентом!
Нравится, что я перестала быть заложником своих идей и синдрома «самозванца» - ох, как было трудно выбраться из этой ямы…
Сейчас я правда нахожусь в том со…
80% людей платят деньги за курсы и сливаются.. и вы готовы к этому разговору
К сожалению, мир онлайн курсов настолько переполнен, что трудно понять, какой из продуктов может реально помочь в продвижении блога
Я долго думала с чего начинать продажи, поэтому мой подход к работе начинается не с предоставления программы обучения, а с бесплатного созвона/интервью, где мы с клиентом обсуждаем все вопросы и сомнения. Опре…
Консультация по росту блога 🙏
Вот что включено:
1️⃣Определение позиционирования, формата блога, тем и сюжетных линий
• Мы прорабатываем, про что вести блог, как проявляться, как выделяться и чем цеплять аудиторию
2️⃣ Образ блога и создание персонажа
• Определяем, каким тебя будут считывать, запоминать и узнавать
• Формируем ассоциативный ряд, визуальное предназначение и запоминаемость блога
3️⃣ Упаковка блога
…
Я поняла, почему у большинства не растёт блог..💔
Всего 3 важных аспекта
1) Привычка.
Ведение блога не должно быть по фану или через силу.
Если трудно - в помощь приходит наставник.
Когда есть человек, которому ты обязан показать результат - выкладываешь контент, даже если не хочется. Именно так формируется привычка, а не работа через силу воли))
2) Встрой блог в жизнь, а не подстраивай жизнь под блог.
Выдели оди…
А что если я скажу вам, что выбирать и не надо было?
Качественный специалист объединяет в себе лучшие компетенции сразу всех перечисленных вариантов ответов
(в идеале относит себя к миллионерам, но этот класс часто относит его обратно - это уж мечты)
Человек одновременно и опытный эксперт, глубоко понимающий рынок и смм, способный создавать вовлекающие сценарии, и талантливый контент-продюсер, создающий уникальные…
The shares total 146%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
У кого бы вы попросили помощь в продвижении своего блога/ совет по бизнесу?
Давайте помогу с выбором, объяснив кто за что отвечает:
💸 Маркетолог расскажет вам, как создать очередь из клиентов, ажиотаж вокруг своих продуктов и доверие аудитории
💸 Контент-продюсер поможет привлечь целевую аудиторию с минимальными вложениями и выстроить систему непрерывного прогрева к вашим услугам/продукту
💰 Предприниматель даст со…
НОВОВВЕДЕНИЕ. УСЛУГА «РАЗБОР БЛОГА»
Формат: разбираю ваш аккаунт и даю обратную связь по всем критериям.
Что разбираю:
🔻ваш аватар, шапку профиля (жирную строку и далее) ИЛИ ТГ канал
🔻ваши актуальные/сохранённые сторис/закрепленная информация
🔻в целом визуальную концепцию профиля
‼️На разборе акцент только вашу упаковку, не контент.
Стоимость услуги: 999₽
Как получить услугу:
пишите мне сюда -> @wijfw «Хочу РАЗ…
❤2
Signed Влада Копытова
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @vlkopytova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 146%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 January 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 560,418 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@vlkopytova named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@vl_kopytova named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Влада | Путь к блогу мечты” (@vlkopytova), 92 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vlkopytova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
