Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Речевое влияние Videos

Channel

Речевое влияние Videos

@vliyanie_videos

Not marked by Telegram, checked 5 October 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

559subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 4 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002186542438
TypeChannel
Username@vliyanie_videos
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded4 October 2026
Last confirmed live24 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/vliyanie_videos

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

557562559.54 October 2026 — 562 subscribers8 October 2026 — 561 subscribers16 October 2026 — 557 subscribers24 October 2026 — 559 subscribers5594 October 202624 October 2026
4 measurements spanning 20 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 556–563 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Oct 2026, 00:39559+2
16 Oct 2026, 02:31557-4
8 Oct 2026, 16:57561-1
4 Oct 2026, 08:22562first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.0%
avg views ÷ 559 subscribers
Avg views / post
67.3
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 October 2026
Posts held20 (22 August 2025 – 3 October 2026)
Views total202
Reactions total17
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Oct 2026, 08:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
20m 48s
Average length
1m 18s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

451 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤23852.8%
🔥10022.2%
👍337.32%
😍265.76%
💯224.88%
🥰132.88%
🙏81.77%
🎉40.887%
🤯20.443%
👌10.222%
👏10.222%
😁10.222%
🤗10.222%
🤩10.222%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 451 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2025 to 3 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Oct 2026, 06:34 UTC50 views5 reactionsread 4 October 2026
Photo

Люди относятся к вам хуже, чем вы заслуживаете. И причина - в довольно коварном механизме: есть ошибки в общении, которые мы даже не осознаём или, ещё хуже, считаем их нормой! Они могут проявляться в ситуациях, когда: – Вы высказываете мысль, а человек вас не слушает и игнорирует.😑 – Хотите убедить, а получаете сопротивление.😬 – Хотите выстроить диалог, а нарываетесь на неприязнь и пренебрежение.🥱 – Хотите избе…

🔥3💯1😍1

1 Oct 2026, 08:53 UTC75 views6 reactionsread 4 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥4💯1😍1

1 Oct 2026, 08:53 UTC77 views6 reactionsread 4 October 2026
Poll

Что в общении вам труднее всего?

  1. Не могу сказать «нет» - соглашаюсь против своего желания.9%
  2. Теряюсь, когда давят. Хороший ответ приходит потом.41%
  3. Начинаю оправдываться, когда меня критикуют.5%
  4. Молчу, коплю раздражение, а потом срываюсь.9%
  5. Меня перебивают, не слушают, не воспринимают всерьёз.0%
  6. Не получается убедить человека, который со мной не согласен.14%
  7. Трудно ясно выразить мысль: говорю много, смысл теряется.14%
  8. Стесняюсь просить о своём: помощи, деньгах, лучших условиях.5%
  9. Избегаю сложных разговоров - боюсь испортить отношения.5%
  10. Другое - напишу в комментариях.0%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👍3❤1😍1🙏1

26 Dec 2025, 04:19 UTC447 views27 reactionsread 4 October 2026
Video

Если хотите влиять мягко и неизбежно получать желаемое , то заменяйте повелительные формулировки на самую мягкую манипуляциию в одно слово «ПРЕДЛАГАЮ ». Оно создаёт иллюзию свободы выбора, когда человек сам «решает» следовать за вами, не чувствуя давления. Согласно исследованиям психологии влияния (Чалдини), люди охотнее соглашаются, если ощущают контроль, а не приказ. Слово «предлагаю»нейтрально переводит фокус с ие…

❤17🔥6👍1🥰1😁1😍1

6 Dec 2025, 07:53 UTC509 views20 reactionsread 4 October 2026
Video

Самая частая манипуляция. Плюс-но-минус — это манипуляция, которая маскирует удар под комплимент. Человек даёт тебе “плюс”, чтобы ты открылся, и сразу же вставляет “минус”, чтобы занизить твою ценность. Реагировать надо только на первую часть: зафиксировать плюс и обнулить минус. Когда ты усиливаешь светлое и игнорируешь токсичное, манипуляция рассыпается сама. Видето с Сергеем Галицким и как ставить человека в туп…

❤16👍4

22 Nov 2025, 07:39 UTC546 views24 reactionsread 4 October 2026
Video

Как отвечать на провокации Канал: РЕЧЕВОЕ ВЛИЯНИЕ Videos #ВикторНосик #РечевоеВлияние #СистемаМедийности

❤14🔥8🎉1👌1

2 Nov 2025, 07:40 UTC672 views33 reactionsread 4 October 2026
Video

Прием речевого айкидо. РЕНАТА ЛИТВИНОВА! Канал: РЕЧЕВОЕ ВЛИЯНИЕ Videos #ВикторНосик #РечевоеВлияние #СистемаМедийности

🔥14💯7👍5🥰4❤2🙏1

30 Oct 2025, 07:23 UTC631 views29 reactionsread 4 October 2026
Video

Как отвечать на неадекватные вопросы. БЕЙОНСЕ vs ЛЕДИ ГАГА Голосуем, Вопрос: Как вы обычно реагируете на тупые провокационные вопросы, которые заданы только чтобы вас зацепить? Варианты: 1. 🤷 Просто игнорирую — не трачу энергию. 2. 😏 Отвечаю с сарказмом, чтобы человек почувствовал неловкость. 3. 🔥 Вспыхиваю и потом жалею. 4. 💬 Задаю встречный вопрос, чтобы вывести человека на чистую воду. Канал: РЕЧЕВОЕ ВЛИ…

❤13🔥7👍4💯3🥰1😍1

7 Oct 2025, 04:20 UTC533 views28 reactionsread 4 October 2026
Video

Яркий пример ЭМОЦИОНАЛЬНОЙ СЛАБОСТИ. Канал: РЕЧЕВОЕ ВЛИЯНИЕ Videos #ВикторНосик #РечевоеВлияние #СистемаМедийности

❤18👍7🎉2🙏1

6 Oct 2025, 04:14 UTC493 views22 reactionsread 4 October 2026
Video

Хитрый прием смыслового подъема. МЭРЛИН МЭНСОН. Первая часть ЗДЕСЬ переходите и смотрите!

❤13🔥5🤩1🤯1😍1🙏1

3 Oct 2025, 07:48 UTC489 views20 reactionsread 4 October 2026
Video

Я убил 10 лет своей жизни на сомнения, страхи и откладывания. (1е видео) В 2012 я впервые захотел стать блогером работая в канаве ДЕПО и глядя на развивающийся Ютуб и образ жизни свежих авторов.. В 2016 году я записал первое видео,☝️вот оно сверху, старое архивное, несуразное , хотя смотря сейчас - я там сказал пару здравых мыслей.., вот это было начало. Но тогда я выложил его и… забросил. В 2017 я купил штатив!…

❤12👍5👏1😍1🙏1

25 Sept 2025, 14:58 UTC503 views7 reactionsread 4 October 2026
Photo

🎯 Сегодня побеждает не тот, у кого больше денег или связей. Побеждает тот, кого слушают. Тот, чьи идеи подхватывают. Тот, кто словом ведёт за собой. Но многие до сих пор не понимают: в XXI веке ПРЕСТУПНО ограничивать своё влияние стенами комнаты или компанией друзей. 🗣 Ваша речь и смыслы должны: — бить через экран, — цеплять через пиксели текста, — врезаться в память образами, — заставлять действовать! 🔑 Главны…

❤4🔥2🎉1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vliyanie_videos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Oct 2026, 08:53 UTCAnonymous Poll22 voters

Что в общении вам труднее всего?

  1. Не могу сказать «нет» - соглашаюсь против своего желания.9%
  2. Теряюсь, когда давят. Хороший ответ приходит потом.41%
  3. Начинаю оправдываться, когда меня критикуют.5%
  4. Молчу, коплю раздражение, а потом срываюсь.9%
  5. Меня перебивают, не слушают, не воспринимают всерьёз.0%
  6. Не получается убедить человека, который со мной не согласен.14%
  7. Трудно ясно выразить мысль: говорю много, смысл теряется.14%
  8. Стесняюсь просить о своём: помощи, деньгах, лучших условиях.5%
  9. Избегаю сложных разговоров - боюсь испортить отношения.5%
  10. Другое - напишу в комментариях.0%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2025 to 3 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

КАНАЛ💛ЖЁЛТОГО
@yellow_airat · 21,015
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 October 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Речевое влияние Videos” (@vliyanie_videos), 559 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vliyanie_videos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.